Spuds or Victims

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.

Who do you hate more?

Spuds
59
76%
Victims
19
24%
 
Total votes: 78

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 47111
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Spuds or Victims

Postby DB10GOONER » Wed Feb 05, 2020 6:51 am

Football has eaten it's own arsehole. :censored:

Clash
Posts: 2461
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:46 pm

Re: Spuds or Victims

Postby Clash » Wed Feb 05, 2020 9:51 pm

That fucking cheating cunnt Son ‘’wins’’ the scum a pen and they win 3-2 having been absolutely shocking in their replay against Southampton.

There was no contact on Son ... but unlike other incidents VAR spends no time looking at it at all ... and BT show virtually no replays either.

Why’s that then? Because it doesn’t suit the narrative? With some teams or players VAR would look to overrule the ref ... or the media would make a big deal about the dive.

Just shows once again how events are being controlled and how the media dictates what is or isn’t controversial. :censored:

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 47111
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Spuds or Victims

Postby DB10GOONER » Thu Feb 06, 2020 6:45 am

That fucking cheating cunnt Son ‘’wins’’ the scum a pen and they win 3-2 having been absolutely shocking in their replay against Southampton.

There was no contact on Son ... but unlike other incidents VAR spends no time looking at it at all ... and BT show virtually no replays either.

Why’s that then? Because it doesn’t suit the narrative? With some teams or players VAR would look to overrule the ref ... or the media would make a big deal about the dive.

Just shows once again how events are being controlled and how the media dictates what is or isn’t controversial. :censored:
It's a weird one isn't it with the scum? The LiVARpool love in is nauseating but sort of understandable as I think a lot of these morons in the media were probably bandwagon jumping mouser fans as kids (when the victims were last successful) but what's the deal with the scum love in? Especially Son. The divers Fat Tongue and Stupid ^^ Eyebrows getting away with murder is understandable because like serial divers Granny Shagger and Slippy G they are Ingerland internationals but the cùnt son is a dirty foreigner :wink: so why is he getting a pass on being one of the worst divers in the game? :censored:

User avatar
rodders999
Posts: 11973
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:59 pm
Location: Diamond Club

Re: Spuds or Victims

Postby rodders999 » Thu Feb 06, 2020 7:57 am

The scum have been completely played off the park in their last 2 games......and won them both :roll:

User avatar
Bradywasking
Posts: 5564
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:14 am

Re: Spuds or Victims

Postby Bradywasking » Thu Feb 06, 2020 8:03 am

That fucking cheating cunnt Son ‘’wins’’ the scum a pen and they win 3-2 having been absolutely shocking in their replay against Southampton.

There was no contact on Son ... but unlike other incidents VAR spends no time looking at it at all ... and BT show virtually no replays either.

Why’s that then? Because it doesn’t suit the narrative? With some teams or players VAR would look to overrule the ref ... or the media would make a big deal about the dive.

Just shows once again how events are being controlled and how the media dictates what is or isn’t controversial. :censored:
My immediate reaction to the Son penalty was that it wasn't a penalty. Sometimes you just know, there is something unnatural about the fall , or the ball goes away from the striker and he makes a desperate exaggerated dive.
Then I remember it was Spurs and the penalty would be given. Spurs were outplayed last night, all over the pitch.

Gunner Rob
Posts: 5966
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 3:05 pm

Re: Spuds or Victims

Postby Gunner Rob » Thu Feb 06, 2020 10:01 am

That fucking cheating cunnt Son ‘’wins’’ the scum a pen and they win 3-2 having been absolutely shocking in their replay against Southampton.

There was no contact on Son ... but unlike other incidents VAR spends no time looking at it at all ... and BT show virtually no replays either.

Why’s that then? Because it doesn’t suit the narrative? With some teams or players VAR would look to overrule the ref ... or the media would make a big deal about the dive.

Just shows once again how events are being controlled and how the media dictates what is or isn’t controversial. :censored:
it is just blatant corruption now.

so VAR overrules a perfectly good Shrewsbury goal but doesn't rule out the Spurs penalty ?
anyone could see on the replay that the goalkeeper never touched Son when he dived.

User avatar
goonertux
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:02 pm

Re: Spuds or Victims

Postby goonertux » Thu Feb 27, 2020 7:30 pm

There are now rumours of banning mass congregation of crowds due to the Coronavirus threat. One positive would be the league is abandoned and the filthy murdering scousers still don’t win the title! 😉👍


Return to “On the Terraces”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, GoonerMuzz, MSN [Bot], StuartL and 27 guests