inaccuracy and falsehood
inaccurate misrepresentation
These all go back to my debates with Quartz, who I would remind you labeled me a stooge for a takeover group from the first weeks virtually. Of course since Quartz said it and you hate my views it must be true so why question it?
But that’s fine because I believe Quartz is by personal choice an apologist for the Board. He defends every single decision they make, and often uses very dubious or even knowing inaccurate or false information and ignores evidence that does not support his views
For example callling deliberately omitting a fifty year difference in project length when trying to compare projects from his argument a technicality…
Such as ignoring the Premier League Report on the Ashley Cole case in favor of the analysis of supporters blogs because he likes to read between the lines….
Such as insisting the sole reason Sol Campbell left Arsenal was to be near his wife’s family when credible news sources quoted him as saying the money to re-sign at the wage he sought him was not there at Arsenal this summer even after having these sources presented to him….
He likes to call these all differences in opinion, which they would be if he was not deliberately ignoring and omitting facts he has knowledge of even after acknowledging some of these facts. That is where inaccuracy which we all can be justifiably accused of at one time or another becomes falsehood and willful misrepresentation of facts.
deluded
avoiding reality
bizarre reasoning
The last three are hardly worth discussing as If you or I two bits form every time these were used by everyone on the forum – ourselves included - we would be wealthy enough to perhaps buy our way into a seat on the Board - and wouldn't you like that if I was on there
.I'll just add this - you seem to want to believe or are unwilling to oewn up to your own abusive behavior as well as that of anyone else. So why don't you jsut tell everyone for the record either that no one has used that sort of language toward me or that it was never used toward me until after I used used it first. Go ahead say that. The moderaotrs may not want to take anyonme's side here which is how it should be but do you think for a moment you could get away with either claim?
Honestly if you admitted your hypocrisy at this point I think you would be viewed with more credibility then you have now. But that's just me saying that.
