Chelsea (A)
- QuartzGooner
- Posts: 14474
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 pm
- Location: London
Chelsea (A)
Who to start next to Flamini?
Otherwise I think we will be overrun.
Otherwise I think we will be overrun.
- Brady's left peg
- Posts: 777
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 10:34 pm
- Location: In GG's brown envelope or the Sussex Coast.
Re: Chelsea (A)
What about a double decker bus...QuartzGooner wrote:Who to start next to Flamini?
Otherwise I think we will be overrun.
-
- Posts: 16904
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:19 pm
- Location: ireland
Re: Chelsea (A)
Could be wrong ,but reckon every member on here myself included expecting to get beaten,just hope its not a hiding.
-
- Posts: 6257
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:53 pm
Re: Chelsea (A)
based on our erratic management and talent - i'm going 7-3 to the chavs. sanchez, per and Jack.
i would set us up super cagey :
----------------Welbeck-------------
Sanchez ---Flam--Ozil--Jack---Ox-
Gibbs----Per---Kos----Chambers
with Gibbo and Chambers under strict orders NOT to go forward together, only one.
i have no idea how wenger will set em up.
-----------Welbeck-------
Caz Sanchez Ozil Jack OX
probably.
i would set us up super cagey :
----------------Welbeck-------------
Sanchez ---Flam--Ozil--Jack---Ox-
Gibbs----Per---Kos----Chambers
with Gibbo and Chambers under strict orders NOT to go forward together, only one.
i have no idea how wenger will set em up.
-----------Welbeck-------
Caz Sanchez Ozil Jack OX
probably.
-
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:58 pm
- Location: In the tube, rather late again......
Re: Chelsea (A)
Will be interesting to see the Gooner fans reaction to Cesc
Other than that Im with Mcd, but we're all a bunch of depressives on here
Other than that Im with Mcd, but we're all a bunch of depressives on here
- Henry Norris 1913
- Posts: 8374
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:25 pm
Re: Chelsea (A)
they're shit we're sh-
oh...
oh...
- RespectTheUmlaut
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2014 2:20 am
Re: Chelsea (A)
I consider myself an optimistic Gooner (probably too optimistic for this forum ) and even I can't see anything other than an absolute spanking for us here, unfortunately.
Nothing would delight me more though than to see us get one over on these plastic small-time losers and all their chavvy fans. Hate them with a passion since they've piped up after being nothing more than an irrelevant cup side for years.
Nothing would delight me more though than to see us get one over on these plastic small-time losers and all their chavvy fans. Hate them with a passion since they've piped up after being nothing more than an irrelevant cup side for years.
Re: Chelsea (A)
Think Welbeck and Sanchez will lead us to a famous win over Moaninho here.
-
- Posts: 16904
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:19 pm
- Location: ireland
Re: Chelsea (A)
1989 wrote:Think Welbeck and Sanchez will lead us to a famous win over Moaninho here.
The old 1989 is back ,overly optimistic and absolutely deluded.
Re: Chelsea (A)
We're getting bummed...no asking permission...no lube...and no pat on the back of the head afterwards....we are getting fucking ram rodded senseless. There's nothing Maureen like better than to make wenger look like the chump he is and Sunday will be no exception!!
Re: Chelsea (A)
I don't think that we will get bummed, but we will lose. 2-0. They will score first and sit back and watch us pass sideways finally hitting us on the counter in the 63rd minute.
Re: Chelsea (A)
2-1 Chavs unless we score first.
Re: Chelsea (A)
It wont be 6 this season but it could be 4 or 5
Re: Chelsea (A)
Just watch Le Wanker's side go all gung ho from the off and get picked off......its gonna be another bad day against them horrible c*unts I can feel it.....
Oh,and fuck Fabregas and their c*nt of a manager.....
Oh,and fuck Fabregas and their c*nt of a manager.....
- Bradywasking
- Posts: 6032
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:14 am
Re: Chelsea (A)
Not confident is an understatement ..something -0 to Chavs. Don't boo Cesc he deserves better than RVP or Nasri.