USMartin wrote:First off its fallacious to indicate there is a simple answer answer here. I can prove it but I doubt in the required minimal time and space you would seek to impose
Second off it is utterly hypocritcal given just how many people have constantly put words in my outh or directly used false or mis-leading information to staisfy there own incorrect of false conlusions abotu me and about whether or not I am a supporter. And if you actually read the posts you know I am absolutely correct about that. Yet I don't see you discouraging any of that or challenging those people to prve the facts behind what they are saying or saying I am saying or have done here or elsewhere. Care to explain? And I won't limit your opportunity to do so in any way whatsoever
I knew you would't even attempt to answer the question!

just deflect attention away instead. Top work, Martin
USMartin wrote:Yet I don't see you discouraging any of that or challenging those people to prve the facts behind what they are saying or saying I am saying or have done here or elsewhere. Care to explain? And I won't limit your opportunity to do so in any way whatsoever
Easy to explain.
I hold you in relatively high regard. I admire your views, your consistency, and your campaign. I've encouraged you on more than one occasion, and even signed your petition.
And, for the reason above, it irritates me that you resort to underhand tactics to wind people up by putting words in their mouths.
You have often attacked Quartz for misleading people, and you clearly despise the fact that the board mislead, lie and basically spout bullshit when it suits them, but you do the same. If something can be engineered to fit your agenda, then all gloves are off

You stoop to their level by twisting words - you
know you do it. You want the moral high ground over the board, but twisting words and manipulating debates by putting words in people's mouths is nothing but a cheap shot. It shoots your integrity to hell.
As for my "inconsistency"...
If I was attending a lecture on food hygiene, then I'd expect the lecturer to practice what he preaches. If, however, he was behaving in a similar fashion to those he condemns for poor hygiene, then I'd be annoyed. I'd be critical. Does that mean, to be consistent, I should be critical and annoyed at
all people who are unhygienic? no, of course not - just the silly sod of a lecturer who can't live up to the standards that
he set!
