Chav$ki thread

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Locked
User avatar
SCREAM AIM FIRE
Posts: 1583
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:53 pm
Location: London

Re: Chav$ki thread

Post by SCREAM AIM FIRE »

North-Bank-1987 wrote:COYG!! Good to see The Ox starting, maybe he's finally started to listen to us! :D

If Benayoun was available he would not have started.

North-Bank-1987
Posts: 317
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 1:49 pm
Location: Blk 6 row3 - @Arsenaljav

Re: Chav$ki thread

Post by North-Bank-1987 »

We'd be 1 down if it wasn't for Kos :roll:

User avatar
p206ab
Posts: 1146
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 5:17 pm
Location: Running around in Europe

Re: Chav$ki thread

Post by p206ab »

Ramsey when will you learn that Torres is behind your back? ?! :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

User avatar
Glitch33
Posts: 919
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:03 pm
Location: No longer Gold

Re: Chav$ki thread

Post by Glitch33 »

62% possession and nothing to show for it

User avatar
safcftm
Posts: 3422
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: Sunderland!

Re: Chav$ki thread

Post by safcftm »

Getting more and more convinced that Wenger has a side nearly good enough to challenge for the title but just plays it entirely wrong. To me you should be a counter attacking side, theres too many players that this style of play simply doesnt suit- Bergkamp, Henry, Pires and Ljungberg loved playing like this and it suited them, it doesnt suit this group of players

User avatar
Glitch33
Posts: 919
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:03 pm
Location: No longer Gold

Re: Chav$ki thread

Post by Glitch33 »

safcftm wrote:Getting more and more convinced that Wenger has a side nearly good enough to challenge for the title but just plays it entirely wrong. To me you should be a counter attacking side, theres too many players that this style of play simply doesnt suit- Bergkamp, Henry, Pires and Ljungberg loved playing like this and it suited them, it doesnt suit this group of players
Need a solid defence to sit back and soak up a bit of pressure though.

User avatar
Glitch33
Posts: 919
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:03 pm
Location: No longer Gold

Re: Chav$ki thread

Post by Glitch33 »

Good effort Kos - hit the bar.

User avatar
Glitch33
Posts: 919
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:03 pm
Location: No longer Gold

Re: Chav$ki thread

Post by Glitch33 »

Good ball by Song to RvP - shame he hit it straight at Cech

User avatar
safcftm
Posts: 3422
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: Sunderland!

Re: Chav$ki thread

Post by safcftm »

Glitch33 wrote:
safcftm wrote:Getting more and more convinced that Wenger has a side nearly good enough to challenge for the title but just plays it entirely wrong. To me you should be a counter attacking side, theres too many players that this style of play simply doesnt suit- Bergkamp, Henry, Pires and Ljungberg loved playing like this and it suited them, it doesnt suit this group of players
Need a solid defence to sit back and soak up a bit of pressure though.
You looked very dangerous there when Rosicky nicked it and hit them on the counter. For me, I think if you played a counter attacking style your defence (when the first choice is available anyway) would look quite good- Gibbs looks lively and can get forward with pace, Sagna is relatively solid, Kos and Vermaelen are strong and can hold teams out.

Trouble is at the minute you play the short possession game and slowly move up the field, when you lose it it means the defensive central midfielders are often out of position as they naturally have to advance forward to support the passing game. If they could stay anchored and help the defence you'd be a solid side. Then you win the ball and you have the pace of the likes of Walcott and Ox along with the passing ability of Rosicky and/ or Arteta, along with a striker who is a great finisher and is much better facing the goal than he is with his back to it (which happens too often with the short style as the killer through ball cant be played).

For the style you play now you really, imo, need technically good wingers and a Bergkamp type upfront with an Henry/ RVP and obviously you dont really have that in your armoury at the minute. You concede quite a few, but I honestly think that if you werent pushing forwards as often and instead picked your moments and destroyed teams with pace, you wouldnt concede many

Top Londoner
Posts: 4992
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 7:35 pm
Location: Taser the cuunt

Re: Chav$ki thread

Post by Top Londoner »

First half we have been pedestrian.
Song and Ramsey are playing as if it is a practice match. Rosicky has been our best player, though I still urge Ramsey to get a grip, and come good. As for Song? Pfffftt.
If Lampard, Drogba, Cashley and Mata had started, then we might be buried by now.
All said, we cannot be any worse second half.

:barscarf:

User avatar
REB
Posts: 23439
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:40 pm
Location: meh

Re: Chav$ki thread

Post by REB »

poor enough , we should be going at them with speed but we slow it down everytime. chelsea could have nicked a goal so we have to be carefull,we are the better side just about.

richpye
Posts: 875
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:51 am

Re: Chav$ki thread

Post by richpye »

Dire start to the half, but a strong finish.
We don't ha;f look good when hitting them on the break though.

Chelsea are being their usual boring selves playing what is it 6/7 in Midfield?

User avatar
Henry Norris 1913
Posts: 8374
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: Chav$ki thread

Post by Henry Norris 1913 »

atmosphere been dissapointing, ramsey his usual gormless self too. why do we have such poor CMs?

STEP IT UP ARSENAL

User avatar
Glitch33
Posts: 919
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:03 pm
Location: No longer Gold

Re: Chav$ki thread

Post by Glitch33 »

Although the back four plus Chesney are OK it need the DM(s) to be quicker thinking and needs a good out ball to set the attackers off. They take too long and too much short or sideways passing and the chance for the break is lost.

User avatar
safcftm
Posts: 3422
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: Sunderland!

Re: Chav$ki thread

Post by safcftm »

Glitch33 wrote:Although the back four plus Chesney are OK it need the DM(s) to be quicker thinking and needs a good out ball to set the attackers off. They take too long and too much short or sideways passing and the chance for the break is lost.
Fair point, they can be a bit ponderous and prone to losing the ball stupidly, but sign a good defensive midfielder and you'd have a side very well set up to play counter attacking football due to having RVP up front, good passers in central midfield and a lot of pace. Mind I suppose Wenger knows more about it than me, I just think its so obvious that theres a good side there if they were to try playing that way rather than trying to play the same old style that worked so well years ago and now isnt bringing rewards. To make this style work I think you'd need 4 or 5 players, to make a counter attacking side work maybe 2 or 3, time will tell I suppose

Locked