As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
I like Giroud and he's a long way from being a "really bad footballer" but I'm not convinced he has enough to worry the top sides and stretch the top defences. We've only 1 win against the top 6 sides this season and I remember thinking in most of those games that we were lacking upfront. If we're serious about challenging for trophies then Giroud is a backup striker or a plan B.
Now, where the fuck art Lukas Podolski? Best finisher at the club by a distance and while he could work much harder he would give us the cutting edge we've been lacking upfront in big games.
LDB wrote:I like Giroud and he's a long way from being a "really bad footballer" but I'm not convinced he has enough to worry the top sides and stretch the top defences. We've only 1 win against the top 6 sides this season and I remember thinking in most of those games that we were lacking upfront. If we're serious about challenging for trophies then Giroud is a backup striker or a plan B.
Now, where the fuck art Lukas Podolski? Best finisher at the club by a distance and while he could work much harder he would give us the cutting edge we've been lacking upfront in big games.
Podolski is a top quality player and I honestly think if Wenger played him as a striker, rather than on the wing where he'd usually have to help out fatos or gibbs, then we wouldnt be talking about what top striker we should sign, because we'd already have one.
Giroud IMO is a good player. I think people expected him to replace Judas but that wasn't going to happen.
Giroud is what you get when you only shop in the £10M-£15M bracket.
Until Arsenal review the wages at the club we will never see the type of player you expect. On the occasion that we do manage to develop a player that matches expectations, he will no doubt leave after realising he can probably do better elsewhere.
Number 5 wrote:If Arsenal as a club were honest about their ambitions then it wouldn't be so bad.
Giroud is the type of footballer that will have you punting around in 4th, 5th, 6th. And thats fine, if indeed 4th, 5th, 6th is the sum total of your ambition.
But when you harp on about wanting to challenge for the very best trophies, a player of Girouds calibre just ain't gonna get you them. Hand on heart JD, in any other top league, that's top league, in European football which club in the top 2 of those leagues do you think would make a sizeable offer for him and have him spearhead their assault on first place?
He's a bit like Bendtner in that some of the parts of his game cannot be improved on any more. His touch. Thats as good as its ever gonna get now. Ever.
didnt he strike Montpellier to the Ligue 1 title over big spending PSG? French league might not the biggest of European leagues but still has some good teams...Drogba came from Marseille after all.
I say give him time, he's already surpassed Drogba's first season stats but Drogba stepped into a title winning calibre side, thats a big difference. He's a good addition to the squad and has the right attitude, unlike Bendtner who you mentioned.
Give him time and he will improve like Forehead and Santos did.10 league goals for an Arsenal centre forward at the start of April is pitiful.Behind Benteke Lambert and Fletcher all playing for teams fighting relegation
henry arsenals all time top goalscorer by april in his 1st season 1911 league minutes 11 goals
giroud 1952 league minutes 10 goals
not suggesting for a moment that giroud will ever be as good as henry but food for thought
Number 5 wrote: in any other top league, that's top league, in European football which club in the top 2 of those leagues do you think would make a sizeable offer for him and have him spearhead their assault on first place?
Big_G wrote:didnt he strike Montpellier to the Ligue 1 title over big spending PSG? French league might not the biggest of European leagues
England
Germany
Spain
Italy
None of the teams that reside in the top two positions in those top European leagues would touch Giroud with a 10 foot bargepoll.
That is all you need to know. He's a bad football player in an average football club. No more no less.
The problem with comparing him to Bergkamp, Henry, Drogba and co is that while they may not have set England on fire for the first few months:
1) They didn't have inherent deficiencies in their game like Giroud. A striker lacking either pace, a good touch or composure/deadliness in front of goal will always be limited but may still be a good PL player if they can adapt their game around it. Giroud seriously lacks all 3.
2) They had all shown traits that belied their potential. Drogba had immense physicality, fitness and could be nigh on unbeatable in the air, Henry had lightning pace, loved running at players and once he started scoring was always destined to be class, and Dennis Bergkamp is the most intelligent and one of the most gifted players to ever lace a pair of football boots. Giroud is good in the air but doesn't score as many headers as he should given this, and he (sometimes) gets through a lot of running.