CL FINAL MOVED

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Hagbard 23
Posts: 649
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:19 am
Location: Agog in the æther.
Contact:

Post by Hagbard 23 »

Lads I've been to Moscow twice in the last five years, and I can't figure out if its the best City I've been to, or the worst!

It's a VERY strange place indeed, and EXTREMELY DANGEROUS!!!

I'd go again though. Image Image

User avatar
Ted B
Posts: 2736
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:59 pm
Location: Awaydays

Post by Ted B »

have i just been april fooled? i asked someone for their number and they said "no, but i'll take yours" :lol:

she ain't gunner call me, is she :cry:

burns718
Posts: 1429
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 7:40 pm

Post by burns718 »

cant understand why on earth fifa or eufa would think any of the eastern block countrys are suitable for a major event like this, and poland gets euro 12 wtf its world renound for its holigan problems. these places are disgusting in terms of random violence 2ward inocent people, and as for the corruption in the forces its just a fooking joke.

im under no ilusions that london is crime free but c'mon no where near the eastern block

User avatar
I Hate Hleb
Posts: 18632
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:36 pm
Location: London

Post by I Hate Hleb »

IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY!! :roll: :lol: :wink:

User avatar
DutchMaestro
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 6:21 pm
Location: The Hole, just behind the front 2...

Post by DutchMaestro »

It raises an interesting issue though...

Surely Juve and Milan fans must have found it a little bizzare having to travel to Manchester for the final in 2003 or 4... The Stadio Olimpico would have been perfect.

Should UEFA consider having a ''reserve'' location - to be used only in cases where the 2 finalists come from the same country?

Logistically difficult, but not impossible, and something that could be clarifed by the quarters or semis, most years... EG, this year, they could have announced Wembley as a reserve location on the same day the quarter final draw was done.

Hagbard 23
Posts: 649
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:19 am
Location: Agog in the æther.
Contact:

Post by Hagbard 23 »

DutchMaestro wrote:It raises an interesting issue though...

Surely Juve and Milan fans must have found it a little bizzare having to travel to Manchester for the final in 2003 or 4... The Stadio Olimpico would have been perfect.

Should UEFA consider having a ''reserve'' location - to be used only in cases where the 2 finalists come from the same country?

Logistically difficult, but not impossible, and something that could be clarifed by the quarters or semis, most years... EG, this year, they could have announced Wembley as a reserve location on the same day the quarter final draw was done.
See IHH's previous post................ IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEEEEEE.....!

User avatar
Red Gunner
Posts: 5778
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: London

Post by Red Gunner »

There was once a suggestion in World Soccer magazine that the final should have a permanent venue. Somewhere in central Europe like France, Belgium and Switzerland. The stadium would be especially built for the Champions League. Would have a big capacity, and would be easy to get to. It sounded like a good idea to say the truth.

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62125
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Post by DB10GOONER »

khalid_red wrote:Should have been given to London. No stabbing, no drugs, no robbing. I've seen people with drugs, knives and robbing in London. But it must be my imagination.

Moscow is as dangerous as London 8)
I hope you are trying to be ironic. Because, if not, you need to travel a whole lot more, mate. :roll:

London is not dangerous at all compared to some cities. Accepted, like all big cities, there are areas you will get hurt/robbed/raped/killed if you go in at the wrong time (even Dublin! :shock: ). But London ain't got shit on places like Moscow, Cairo, Capetown, Washington, Rio, Johannesburgh, Kingston or Mexico City. Mexico City alone averages 15000 (FIFTEEN THOUSAND :!: :shock: ) murders every year... Jaysus.

I'm not including obvious places like the Congo, Iraq, Afghanistan or the Ivory Coast where war, civil war, terrorism etc are the main problem.

London dangerous? Pah! :wink:

User avatar
Red Gunner
Posts: 5778
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: London

Post by Red Gunner »

DB10GOONER wrote:
khalid_red wrote:Should have been given to London. No stabbing, no drugs, no robbing. I've seen people with drugs, knives and robbing in London. But it must be my imagination.

Moscow is as dangerous as London 8)
I hope you are trying to be ironic. Because, if not, you need to travel a whole lot more, mate. :roll:

London is not dangerous at all compared to some cities. Accepted, like all big cities, there are areas you will get hurt/robbed/raped/killed if you go in at the wrong time (even Dublin! :shock: ). But London ain't got shit on places like Moscow, Cairo, Capetown, Washington, Rio, Johannesburgh, Kingston or Mexico City. Mexico City alone averages 15000 (FIFTEEN THOUSAND :!: :shock: ) murders every year... Jaysus.

I'm not including obvious places like the Congo, Iraq, Afghanistan or the Ivory Coast where war, civil war, terrorism etc are the main problem.

London dangerous? Pah! :wink:
No, I wasn't ironic. I've been to Moscow but didn't find it dangerous. I am not about to travel into danger spots where I might get killed as I am 17. London's stabbings are enough for me :lol: :wink:

User avatar
QuartzGooner
Posts: 14474
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 pm
Location: London

Post by QuartzGooner »

26may1989 wrote:
burns718 wrote:probably cos russia is not in europe, technicaly. russia is a continent isnt it, correct me if im wrong
Ok Burnsy, you're wrong! Russia is not a continent (the only one-country continent is Australia). The Ural Mountains, which are inside Russia, mark the division between Europe and Asia. I think most Russians live west of the Urals and are therefore European. And Moscow is the biggest city in Europe by population (around 10million).

Anyway, in football terms, Russia is a UEFA member and so the whole of it is "European" for the purposes of football, as Turkey also is.
The continents are either six or seven in number depending on your opinion:

Europe
Africa
Asia
The Americas
Antartica
Oceana (Australia, New Zealand and a load of Pacific Islands)

Some split the Americas into North and South America to make seven.


I think the Russian authorities will swamp Moscow with Police and Army for the final, they will not want to be seen as dangerous with the media of the world looking at them.

26may1989
Posts: 1538
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 1:31 am

Post by 26may1989 »

QuartzGooner wrote:The continents are either six or seven in number depending on your opinion:

Europe
Africa
Asia
The Americas
Antartica
Oceana (Australia, New Zealand and a load of Pacific Islands)

Some split the Americas into North and South America to make seven.
It's arguable whether there is a continent called "Oceania". It is a geopolitical entity, but it is not a physical entity. Australia on its own is a continental land-mass, the various islands being spearate from it (like Britain and Ireland are from continental Europe). In fact, unlike Britain and Ireland in relation to continental Europe, New Zealand and many of the South Pacific islands aren't even on the same continental shelf as Australia.

But in geopolitical terms, you're right!

User avatar
QuartzGooner
Posts: 14474
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 pm
Location: London

Post by QuartzGooner »

Yeah, it's an imprecise geopgraphy!

We could use football continents, in which case the Caribbean is linked to North America.

Hagbard 23
Posts: 649
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:19 am
Location: Agog in the æther.
Contact:

Post by Hagbard 23 »

26may1989 wrote: It's arguable whether there is a continent called "Oceania". It is a geopolitical entity, but it is not a physical entity. Australia on its own is a continental land-mass, the various islands being spearate from it (like Britain and Ireland are from continental Europe). In fact, unlike Britain and Ireland in relation to continental Europe, New Zealand and many of the South Pacific islands aren't even on the same continental shelf as Australia.

But in geopolitical terms, you're right!
Stop using 'Lawyerish' Spiel to elucidate yuor points 26may.

Australasia is a term used by the United Kingdom, and her (dwindling) colonies.

'Oceania', in Greek, (who actually named this CONTINENT first) is called , (phonetically) , O-GEE-A-NEE.

Shakespeare said something about lawyers....What was it again ??? Image

26may1989
Posts: 1538
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 1:31 am

Post by 26may1989 »

Hagbard 23 wrote:Stop using 'Lawyerish' Spiel to elucidate yuor points 26may.

Australasia is a term used by the United Kingdom, and her (dwindling) colonies.

'Oceania', in Greek, (who actually named this CONTINENT first) is called , (phonetically) , O-GEE-A-NEE.

Shakespeare said something about lawyers....What was it again ??? Image
Something about them standard bearers for all that is good in the world, wasn't it? Honest, caring, helpful, funny, respected, that pretty much sums us up. Everyone loves us...

Post Reply