Bradford.FC fire (Hillsborough Comparison)

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
User avatar
QuartzGooner
Posts: 14474
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 pm
Location: London

Re: Bradford.FC fire

Post by QuartzGooner »

SPARKSY wrote:
QuartzGooner wrote:
And this is the third time I have made this point on here but anyone else who was in away end at White Hart Lane, squashed into the cages, for the League Cup semi final in 1987 will know a Hillsborough type event almost did happen to us.


You're right. I was in the park Lane that night and it was as packed, if not more, than the Leppings Lane seemed to be. If you remember there was also only 1 way out of each section - through a small gate at the top of the terrace.
Our group walked in from the left side of the stadium, the entrance next to the new West stand.
The idea was you would walk to the next section along the terrace but that was part of the problem, the way to do that was through a small gate which the police would keep locked until the section to the left was full to bursting, then open it and let you walk along.
Which is why we were getting squashed against the railings and the locked gates.
It all happened about 35 - 40 minutes before kick off, the police were ignoring us shouting for them to open the gates and just looking on.

Was a very close run thing that afternoon, I reckon that at the rate the terraces were filling we were less than two minutes from another Hillsborough.
Thank G-D we all got out safely.

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: Bradford.FC fire

Post by northbank123 »

DB10GOONER wrote:
clockender1 wrote:That is such a dreadful list - father and sons together, married couples, and the Fletcher family - three generations lost together.
This sums it up for me. Reading through those names. Dads and sons. Grandads and grandkids. Families. Just horrific. I remember seeing that footage of the poor guy on fire. Jesus what a terrible tragedy it was.

As was Hillsborough. I have nothing but sympathy for those that died that day too and their families. Let's not forget the ones that died were the ones that (mostly) turned up on time, with tickets, and were crushed by the surge from behind them.

It's the way the Mousers don't acknowledge their role in the tragedy and all but ignore the fact they murdered 39 Italians that sticks in my craw. It's always some one else's fault with them. The "Justice for the 96" scarves and banners... Whilst I agree there should be justice for the dead and their families, and any culpable police and authorities should be punished, I would add should justice not also be punishing their fellow fans that arrived late pissed up and without tickets and rushed the turnstiles and that still do that same shit even today? :|
Justice for the 96 - I absolutely agree with that sentence. Those poor souls deserve this limited form of justice and those responsible for the deaths and the cover-ups - be they football fan, copper or politician - should be held accountable. Not that it will do anything to bring them back.

But the whole "JFT96" slogan? Most of the cretins who mindlessly tag this on to the end of every social media post to do with football don't want justice for the 96 people who died. They just want everybody to know that Liverpool FC were wronged. That there was, and is, an agenda against the club from the media, the FA, the government, anyone and everyone. It's thrown around by anyone remotely connected to the club (e.g. new foreign ressies players :roll:) because it's a cheap and easy way to gain acceptance from the fans.

It's not the being reminded of it that irritates me, it is what the campaign now stands for. Imo the focus is so far removed from the human tragedy and it is just a web of bitterness and anger. Obviously it has particular meaning for Liverpool fans, of course it does, but to them they own the tragedy. Until they want everybody else to acknowledge it, at which point it briefly becomes a football tragedy. When really it is a human tragedy. Sadly it's now got to the point where if I see JFT96 scrawled somewhere or hear the start of a story about Hillsborough on the news I just completely zone out, it evokes nothing.

As for constant demands for a new enquiry, can you imagine any public figure having the balls to come out and place any blame on Liverpool fans? No way. I remember Paul Merson saying that he once managed to prove to GG that a letter to the club complaining about his behaviour out and about was untrue as he was abroad at the time and must have been from a rival fan. He used this excuse every time the club got a letter even though most were probably true. It seems not too dissimilar here - clearly the police have acted disgracefully and dishonestly in some ways here, therefore Liverpool claim that every single claim they made about Liverpool fans being drunk, late, aggressive etc must also be a malicious lie. There is no hope of really finding the truth if nobody has the means or the will to pursue ALL of the evidence objectively.

As I said before I think kids growing up in this era will struggle to really grasp the real tragedy of Hillsborough because the 'campaign' completely eclipses the event nowadays. Which is a travesty and a great shame.

User avatar
Bradywasking
Posts: 6251
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:14 am

Re: Bradford.FC fire

Post by Bradywasking »

Good post northbank123 ...I particularly agree with your point about owning the tragedy.. Is it possible to separate a tragedy from it's victims ? You wouldn't think it could be possible but yet at times I think this is what has happened with Hillsborough. It was a Liverpool tragedy but , I am open to criticism here, more importantly it was a football tragedy and a symptom of the attitude towards football fans at that time. It didn't happen because Thatcher hated Scousers it happened because football was a viewed as a mass movement of hooligans on every Saturday from August to May year in year out. Football stood beside Liverpool , but twenty five years later the collective chips on Liverpool FC and their supporter's shoulders want the World to know that they stood and walked alone.. That is an insult to other clubs and their supporters. Read Quart's post on the Lane in 1987 and it could have been Arsenal..it could have been anybody.

User avatar
SPUDMASHER
Posts: 10739
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:07 am
Location: London Euston
Contact:

Re: Bradford.FC fire

Post by SPUDMASHER »

Guys, we should never forget what happened that day. 96 innocent people lost their lives in the most tragic of circumstance.

I do understand though how the general feelings of sympathy for those affected by this human tragedy are being replaced with an ever growing "FFS, not that again" attitude from a large percentage of the population. As many have said here before, those responsible need to be held to account....proper account. I just wish those that run this campaign would be big enough to come out and themselves admit an uncomfortable truth...'Some responsibility lies with Liverpool supporters that turned up late/pissed/without tickets'. It may only be a small part of the cause but to continue to deny it 100% only weakens their case.
I agree with what others have said here, it really could have been anyone. I recall being at Highbury for a game against the mousers in the mid 80's (can't remember when but it I think it finished 1-2 although I could be getting confused) there were 54,000 in there that day. I was up the back of the north bank and could barely move. I hate to think what it was like down the front. This was a disaster waiting to happen and it became reality very soon afterward.

I think this campaign should continue with absolute vigour to get the justice those poor people deserve. After that we should consign it to memory and the annual commemoration should be a private affair for the families of the victims.

Wazza97
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:07 pm

Re: Bradford.FC fire

Post by Wazza97 »

SPUDMASHER wrote:Guys, we should never forget what happened that day. 96 innocent people lost their lives in the most tragic of circumstance.

I do understand though how the general feelings of sympathy for those affected by this human tragedy are being replaced with an ever growing "FFS, not that again" attitude from a large percentage of the population. As many have said here before, those responsible need to be held to account....proper account. I just wish those that run this campaign would be big enough to come out and themselves admit an uncomfortable truth...'Some responsibility lies with Liverpool supporters that turned up late/pissed/without tickets'. It may only be a small part of the cause but to continue to deny it 100% only weakens their case.
I agree with what others have said here, it really could have been anyone. I recall being at Highbury for a game against the mousers in the mid 80's (can't remember when but it I think it finished 1-2 although I could be getting confused) there were 54,000 in there that day. I was up the back of the north bank and could barely move. I hate to think what it was like down the front. This was a disaster waiting to happen and it became reality very soon afterward.

I think this campaign should continue with absolute vigour to get the justice those poor people deserve. After that we should consign it to memory and the annual commemoration should be a private affair for the families of the victims.
Agree with a lot of what has been said but Highbury was the one ground where this couldn't happen as we refused to install fences. The biggest factor at Hillsborough was surely the fences, no fences and everyone simply spills onto the pitch. Ironically the FA stopped using Highbury for semi finals purely because we wouldn't install fences. I was proud at the time that we stuck to our principals and refused to cage our supporters,

User avatar
SPUDMASHER
Posts: 10739
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:07 am
Location: London Euston
Contact:

Re: Bradford.FC fire

Post by SPUDMASHER »

If you recall the old north bank stand, the drop at the front was quite significant. With the advertising hoardings being fixed there too it was still a reasonable height to have to climb over. Combine that with a surge from the back and you could quickly be in trouble. It is fair to say though that the lack of fencing would help a lot.

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62158
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Bradford.FC fire

Post by DB10GOONER »

SPUDMASHER wrote:If you recall the old north bank stand, the drop at the front was quite significant. With the advertising hoardings being fixed there too it was still a reasonable height to have to climb over. Combine that with a surge from the back and you could quickly be in trouble. It is fair to say though that the lack of fencing would help a lot.
Be honest, you couldn't see over the hoardings, huh? :D :wink:

User avatar
SPUDMASHER
Posts: 10739
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:07 am
Location: London Euston
Contact:

Re: Bradford.FC fire

Post by SPUDMASHER »

DB10GOONER wrote:
SPUDMASHER wrote:If you recall the old north bank stand, the drop at the front was quite significant. With the advertising hoardings being fixed there too it was still a reasonable height to have to climb over. Combine that with a surge from the back and you could quickly be in trouble. It is fair to say though that the lack of fencing would help a lot.
Be honest, you couldn't see over the hoardings, huh? :D :wink:
I could if I stood on your fat fucking head :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:

I always stood half way up at the front of the second tier. There was a walkway that ran across the stand there and it afforded you a long drop to the row in front. You got a really good view from there (and first dibs with the peanut seller at half time :wink: )

Wazza97
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:07 pm

Re: Bradford.FC fire

Post by Wazza97 »

SPUDMASHER wrote:If you recall the old north bank stand, the drop at the front was quite significant. With the advertising hoardings being fixed there too it was still a reasonable height to have to climb over. Combine that with a surge from the back and you could quickly be in trouble. It is fair to say though that the lack of fencing would help a lot.
Fair point. And no fences and Hiillsbrorogh would not have happened or at least been nowhere near as bad. Supporters at the time were just treated with contempt. We we to Middlesbrough a few weeks later, Ayresome park. Arrived at the back of the away terrace 10 minutes before kick off and the police just told us to "push our way forwards" it really did beggar belief
While I agree the whole search for justice it just seems Justice for the 96 seem to have assumed they now speak for all supporters on other subjects. Safe standing for example, many want it but Justice for 96 keep referring any debate back to Hilsborough. Current Safe terracing bears no relation at all to what happened in April 89

LDB
Posts: 6663
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:13 pm
Location: Having a cup of tea and waiting for all this to blow over

Re: Bradford.FC fire

Post by LDB »

Good point, the FA got off very lightly considering. All the focus on the police and the fans ignores the fact that no fences = no deaths.

User avatar
MK Gould
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:25 pm
Location: North Bucks

Re: Bradford.FC fire

Post by MK Gould »

LDB wrote:Good point, the FA got off very lightly considering. All the focus on the police and the fans ignores the fact that no fences = no deaths.
Didn't it turn out that Hillsborough had failed it's safety inspection and yet was still awarded the semi final...? Damn right the FA got off lightly, and still does. Everyone blames the police and/or the scousers. But the top guys in the FA do have a case to answer!

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62158
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Bradford.FC fire

Post by DB10GOONER »

SPUDMASHER wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
SPUDMASHER wrote:If you recall the old north bank stand, the drop at the front was quite significant. With the advertising hoardings being fixed there too it was still a reasonable height to have to climb over. Combine that with a surge from the back and you could quickly be in trouble. It is fair to say though that the lack of fencing would help a lot.
Be honest, you couldn't see over the hoardings, huh? :D :wink:
I could if I stood on your fat fucking head :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:
Yep - I can see you coming running at me, your little legs pumping for all they're worth, a step ladder cockily thrown over your shoulder... :lol: :wink:

User avatar
Goose
Posts: 543
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:18 pm

Re: Bradford.FC fire

Post by Goose »

I seem to remember the Bradford fire being used in a fire safety course at work. I could be wrong but the guy said that most of those that perished were the ones that followed the evacuation procedure. They were supposed to go through the concourse under the stand and out through the exit doors. Once down there they were trapped because the doors were locked to stop people trying to get in without paying.

Those poor souls were failed by their clubs safety system, police & FA.

Both tragedies were awful but I do think Bradford is not remembered in the football community as much as it should be.

User avatar
MK Gould
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:25 pm
Location: North Bucks

Re: Bradford.FC fire

Post by MK Gould »

The 29th anniversary coincides with the last day of the Premier League season. Would be nice to think it would be marked in some way.

MutleyGooner
Posts: 2645
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 10:39 am
Location: Living next door to my neighbours

Re: Bradford.FC fire

Post by MutleyGooner »

Bradford fire was awful but seems to be remembered privately by those affected, whereas the Hillsborough disaster is more a scousetasticly a Jd Sports affair. I feel sorry for the 96 not just for their deaths but more so for the way in which they have become a stick to promote Liverpool FC and beat everyone else with. We gave a minute silence at the weekend but were yet again expected to do so again last night.........YAWN, it happened, it shouldn't have and clubs have made changes to ensure it never happens again, now get over it and move on. But that's not the Scousets motive is it? They want a payout.

Post Reply