Anyone a fan of Denilson, Eboue or Song on here?

harryo63 · Post by **harryo63** » Sun Nov 29, 2009 5:06 pm

dennilson and song . both shite and exposed today against chelsea. not good enough ,never will be . no matter wat wenger tells u

mrgnu1958 · Post by **mrgnu1958** » Sun Nov 29, 2009 5:36 pm

Add walcott will ya

Radford149 · Post by **Radford149** » Sun Nov 29, 2009 5:43 pm

mrgnu1958 wrote:Add walcott will ya

radford has also been saying this for a very long time

harryo63 · Post by **harryo63** » Sun Nov 29, 2009 5:52 pm

barnfield88 wrote:
northbankbren wrote:no lets hope he's sold and replaced in the summer.
I would have Denilson over ANY midfielder in the world, he aint here shouting about money and shit like that, every game he runs his socks off and TRIES 100%, fuck world class, all them wankers want is money, i would rather have a player who would play for the shirt than money.....

ha ha ha

wlchuccc · Post by **wlchuccc** » Sun Nov 29, 2009 5:58 pm

Please sell Denilson for free now, fucking useless, the most lazy *word censored* ever

harryo63 · Post by **harryo63** » Sun Nov 29, 2009 6:09 pm

dennilson just comes back and waltzes into the team wat the fuck. rvp gets injured and these girls give up. time this bringing kids threw and getting walloped by real pros every fuckin year was ended. groundhog day every year. fuckin dennilson. wengers lost it. i forecast we will not finish top 5 with this bunch of overpaid overated kids

Magic Hat · Post by **Magic Hat** » Sun Nov 29, 2009 6:15 pm

Very dissapointed in Song's refusal to attack the ball in the air, can't standing and waiting for it to drop. On the ground, felt both did their job well enough in the first half

Magic Hat · Post by **Magic Hat** » Sun Nov 29, 2009 6:15 pm

Edit: Sorry, double post

Jumpers For Goalposts · Sun Nov 29, 2009 6:32 pm

harryo63 wrote:dennilson and song . both shite and exposed today against chelsea. not good enough ,never will be . no matter wat wenger tells u

Agreed!! I don't know why we're still having this argument.

Song, Denilson, Eboue plus Diaby, Walcott and a few others are good enough to see off Bolton, Wolves or Sp**s but that's not what Arsenal should be about.

We need to get back above Man U and the Chavs and these players will NEVER allow us to do that. They don't have the desire or Arsene's beloved "football intelligence".

I need to think hard to remember when we last beat one of our major rivals in a game that really mattered - Cardiff 2005 with a totally different team??

Surely Arsene can see what is blindingly obvious to most of us ????

Post by **I Hate Hleb** » Sun Nov 29, 2009 6:57 pm

Magic Hat wrote:Very dissapointed in Song's refusal to attack the ball in the air, can't standing and waiting for it to drop. On the ground, felt both did their job well enough in the first half

Jesus Magic, your desparation to defend Denilson at all costs is becoming almost as laughable as Wenger's!!:oops: Song was much the better of the 2 in all aspects of the game, and the criticism you have is that he didn't attack the ball enough? You then compound it by trying to equate Song's overall performance with Denilson's!!

What the hell did the Brazilian do?

I don't care what any statistics say: anyone that had their eyes open and facing the telly during that match would have seen Denilson giving the ball away time after time - even when under no presurre at all!!

When he did manage to get the ball to an Arsenal shirt it was normally either under-hit, too strong or behind the receipient. So he made a couple of block tackles - shit, even an immoveable and inanimate object would somehow get in the way at least twice.

I thought at the time, and still believe, that it was a mistake for Wenger to take Song off instead of Denilson. Wasn't a big fan of Song initially but I have seen the improvement in his game. Alas, I can't say the say for the Brazilian version of David Hillier!!!

Magic Hat · Post by **Magic Hat** » Sun Nov 29, 2009 7:03 pm

Or I have a separate opinion to you

Well Denilson didn't seem to go for any header's, I just don't expect him too whereas it was more noticeable with Song. As for what he actually did, I felt he kept the ball, no more and no less then that. You evidentialy saw differently and I thought Denilson was poor in the second half

Jumpers For Goalposts · Sun Nov 29, 2009 7:04 pm

Alas, I can't say the say for the Brazilian version of David Hillier!!!

[/quote]

You do David Hillier a dis-service with that. Denilson would probably even nick the wrong suitcase!!!!

I've never seen a top player give the ball away as much as Denilson - I swear he's colour-blind!!

donaldo · Post by **donaldo** » Sun Nov 29, 2009 7:05 pm

Song has looked good against poor teams but against Essien and Mikel he was found out.As for Denilson a 5 yard square ball is all he does.And dont get me started on Walcott

tinpot lane · Post by **tinpot lane** » Sun Nov 29, 2009 7:06 pm

Why did he take Song off? Denilson showed everyone exactly what he is. A useless duck.

Post by **I Hate Hleb** » Sun Nov 29, 2009 7:10 pm

Really Donaldo?:shock:

I thought we bossed the midfield for the majority of the first half and just lacked the cutting thrust/the final ball. Song was everywhere in that period and Essen/Mikel/Lampard were all having a relatively quiet game.

Where Chelsea did have the advantage was up front and in their distribution from out wide. It was only in the second half when Song had gone off that the Chelsea midfield got on top of the game.