Fabregas/anyone else who dont want to be here - FUCK OFF!!!!

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
User avatar
flash gunner
Posts: 29243
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:55 am
Location: Armchairsville. FACT.

Post by flash gunner »

antgel wrote:We'll get loads of cash for him and be able to buy 2-3 players to strengthen the team, and that will have more influence than a single Fabregas.
Out of all your long post this is where your argument falls down immediately

User avatar
antgel
Posts: 386
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 1:27 pm
Location: Planet Earth

Post by antgel »

flash gunner wrote:
antgel wrote:We'll get loads of cash for him and be able to buy 2-3 players to strengthen the team, and that will have more influence than a single Fabregas.
Out of all your long post this is where your argument falls down immediately
Are you going to explain why, or just flame?

User avatar
flash gunner
Posts: 29243
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:55 am
Location: Armchairsville. FACT.

Post by flash gunner »

antgel wrote:
flash gunner wrote:
antgel wrote:We'll get loads of cash for him and be able to buy 2-3 players to strengthen the team, and that will have more influence than a single Fabregas.
Out of all your long post this is where your argument falls down immediately
Are you going to explain why, or just flame?
What evidence have we as gooners got that will say Wenger will go out and spend most/all of Cesc' money on 2 or 3 players???? We can only go by the past and we all know we dont buy big or many either anymore!!!! We will make do with what we've got unless you know definitively otherwise?

User avatar
antgel
Posts: 386
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 1:27 pm
Location: Planet Earth

Post by antgel »

flash gunner wrote:
antgel wrote:
flash gunner wrote:
antgel wrote:We'll get loads of cash for him and be able to buy 2-3 players to strengthen the team, and that will have more influence than a single Fabregas.
Out of all your long post this is where your argument falls down immediately
Are you going to explain why, or just flame?
What evidence have we as gooners got that will say Wenger will go out and spend most/all of Cesc' money on 2 or 3 players???? We can only go by the past and we all know we dont buy big or many either!!!! We will make do with what we've got unless you know definitively otherwise?
I agree, up to a point. You're right about the past, although this will be the first time we have gotten so much money from a transfer, as I understand it, so there will be more to splash out. I can't see it *all* going to finance our debt.

Also, I feel that towards the end of last season (Birmingham-ish) Wenger's considerable patience finally snapped. Time will tell.

User avatar
Only One Tony Adams
Posts: 1761
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:41 pm
Location: Block 102 Upper Tier

Post by Only One Tony Adams »

antgel wrote:
flash gunner wrote:
antgel wrote:
flash gunner wrote:
antgel wrote:We'll get loads of cash for him and be able to buy 2-3 players to strengthen the team, and that will have more influence than a single Fabregas.
Out of all your long post this is where your argument falls down immediately
Are you going to explain why, or just flame?
What evidence have we as gooners got that will say Wenger will go out and spend most/all of Cesc' money on 2 or 3 players???? We can only go by the past and we all know we dont buy big or many either!!!! We will make do with what we've got unless you know definitively otherwise?
I agree, up to a point. You're right about the past, although this will be the first time we have gotten so much money from a transfer, as I understand it, so there will be more to splash out. I can't see it *all* going to finance our debt.
Also, I feel that towards the end of last season (Birmingham-ish) Wenger's considerable patience finally snapped. Time will tell.
Sorry but that's exactly where the cash will go ....... :roll:

User avatar
donaldo
Posts: 8175
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:33 pm
Location: The gates of hell waiting for Wenger

Post by donaldo »

antgel wrote:
flash gunner wrote:
antgel wrote:
flash gunner wrote:
antgel wrote:We'll get loads of cash for him and be able to buy 2-3 players to strengthen the team, and that will have more influence than a single Fabregas.
Out of all your long post this is where your argument falls down immediately
Are you going to explain why, or just flame?
What evidence have we as gooners got that will say Wenger will go out and spend most/all of Cesc' money on 2 or 3 players???? We can only go by the past and we all know we dont buy big or many either!!!! We will make do with what we've got unless you know definitively otherwise?
I agree, up to a point. You're right about the past, although this will be the first time we have gotten so much money from a transfer, as I understand it, so there will be more to splash out. I can't see it *all* going to finance our debt.

Also, I feel that towards the end of last season (Birmingham-ish) Wenger's considerable patience finally snapped. Time will tell.
£41m for Toure and Greedy.We didnt even spend a quarter of that.And we ended up signing Sol and Chamakh on free transfer.So much for spending all the money we get in for transfers. :banghead: :cry: :cry:

User avatar
augie
Posts: 30986
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by augie »

Antgel I really dont know where to start but here goes -

Firstly I agree 100% with you that cesc was given the captaincy to appease him and I also disagree with this policy of doing so. I never claimed that he is an exceptional captain or leader but I did say that he is our talisman which basically means that we go as cesc goes and if he is missing or marked out of a game then we are a much lesser team and that, in my opinion at least, the true definition of a talisman.

Your point about loyalty and where my opinion originates re the players loyalty to wenger is simple....the players say it often enough in interviews how they feel towards wenger. Do I think that we are the only club that is affected by the lack of player loyalty of course not but it was you that questioned where the loyalty has gone not me.

Can I say that I never claimed that I was speaking for the vast majority of fans - what I did imply and maybe should have said is that is the views that have been made crystal clear from the fans on this forum (if you want to read them) have suggested that they want sucess as opposed to expect sucess. The problem with you and your ilk is that it is easier for you to label unhappy fans as those that expect sucess as a right rather than actually accept that some of the complaints are valid. It is like your automatic assumption that we will win the league within 10 years cos that is the way the world works :? I'm sure that back in 1990 fans of liverpool didnt expect that it would be another 20+ years before they won the league and they were coming off a period of absolute dominance. It is all very well developing your own talent but if you are continually selling your best players how do we as a club make progress on the field ? You have acknowledged that we dont spend much of our income from sales but suggest this time it will be different cos it is the first time we have received this kind of money but just last summer we received 40m from man shitty and spent fcuk all of it too :roll: When you dont have any hard facts either way all you can do is go on past examples and that is not good

User avatar
antgel
Posts: 386
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 1:27 pm
Location: Planet Earth

Post by antgel »

donaldo wrote: £41m for Toure and Greedy.We didnt even spend a quarter of that.And we ended up signing Sol and Chamakh on free transfer.So much for spending all the money we get in for transfers. :banghead: :cry: :cry:
Firstly, that's two transfers, not one. Secondly, what happened in the past is not a guarantee as to what will happen in the future. But if you lot want to let it wind you up, so be it. If you're going to get wound up every time we don't win something, you'll spend a lot of your life wound up, and for what?

User avatar
augie
Posts: 30986
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by augie »

antgel wrote:
donaldo wrote: £41m for Toure and Greedy.We didnt even spend a quarter of that.And we ended up signing Sol and Chamakh on free transfer.So much for spending all the money we get in for transfers. :banghead: :cry: :cry:
Firstly, that's two transfers, not one. Secondly, what happened in the past is not a guarantee as to what will happen in the future. But if you lot want to let it wind you up, so be it. If you're going to get wound up every time we don't win something, you'll spend a lot of your life wound up, and for what?

I'm not going to get wound up anymore cos you have assured me that we will within the league within 10 years (is that from now or from the last time we won it ? :? ) so I'm well pleased :roll: :banghead: :lol:

User avatar
marcengels
Posts: 7208
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 11:12 pm
Location: North Bank

Post by marcengels »

antgel wrote:
donaldo wrote: £41m for Toure and Greedy.We didnt even spend a quarter of that.And we ended up signing Sol and Chamakh on free transfer.So much for spending all the money we get in for transfers. :banghead: :cry: :cry:
Firstly, that's two transfers, not one. Secondly, what happened in the past is not a guarantee as to what will happen in the future. But if you lot want to let it wind you up, so be it. If you're going to get wound up every time we don't win something, you'll spend a lot of your life wound up, and for what?
£41m is £41m....who cares how many transfers, that money was not spent.

User avatar
flash gunner
Posts: 29243
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:55 am
Location: Armchairsville. FACT.

Post by flash gunner »

augie wrote:
antgel wrote:
donaldo wrote: £41m for Toure and Greedy.We didnt even spend a quarter of that.And we ended up signing Sol and Chamakh on free transfer.So much for spending all the money we get in for transfers. :banghead: :cry: :cry:
Firstly, that's two transfers, not one. Secondly, what happened in the past is not a guarantee as to what will happen in the future. But if you lot want to let it wind you up, so be it. If you're going to get wound up every time we don't win something, you'll spend a lot of your life wound up, and for what?

I'm not going to get wound up anymore cos you have assured me that we will within the league within 10 years (is that from now or from the last time we won it ? :? ) so I'm well pleased :roll: :banghead: :lol:
If augie is happy we are all happy :happydance: :wink:

User avatar
augie
Posts: 30986
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by augie »

:barscarf: :barscarf: :barscarf:

User avatar
goonersid
Posts: 8838
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 9:40 am
Location: DERRY CITY

Post by goonersid »

flash gunner wrote:
augie wrote:
antgel wrote:
donaldo wrote: £41m for Toure and Greedy.We didnt even spend a quarter of that.And we ended up signing Sol and Chamakh on free transfer.So much for spending all the money we get in for transfers. :banghead: :cry: :cry:
Firstly, that's two transfers, not one. Secondly, what happened in the past is not a guarantee as to what will happen in the future. But if you lot want to let it wind you up, so be it. If you're going to get wound up every time we don't win something, you'll spend a lot of your life wound up, and for what?

I'm not going to get wound up anymore cos you have assured me that we will within the league within 10 years (is that from now or from the last time we won it ? :? ) so I'm well pleased :roll: :banghead: :lol:
If augie is happy we are all happy :happydance: :wink:
Did I miss something? Has AW promised us a trophy this season. :lol:

User avatar
marcengels
Posts: 7208
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 11:12 pm
Location: North Bank

Post by marcengels »

I want all of our best players to fuck off, freeing up space to those who are currently being killed by said best players.

:shock: :roll: :wink:

rigsby
Posts: 3046
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:52 am

Post by rigsby »

If we sold Fabregas, used the money to sign a few defensive players, but he said he wanted Wilshire to take Cescs role how would you all feel?

Post Reply