It's all a load of Cannonballs in here! This is the virtual Arsenal pub where you can chat about anything except football. Be warned though, like any pub, the content may not always be suitable for everyone.
augie wrote:
Not if you take away the goals he scored against championship coventry and half of reading's first team he aint
Seems like you are nitpicking a bit.
Walcott with all players fit, should be in our starting 11, and we are likely to sell him for nothing because we probably have to. We will be picking up (and probably overpaying) for someone who has never played in the Premiership - he may turn out to be amazing, but I'd hope that he buys someone who is a good player now rather than one who may be a good player in a couple of seasons.
Do you trust Wenger to do that? I have my doubts...
begeegs wrote:Walcott will be gone in January for a pittance and we will buy Zaha. That is believable. Zaha has 'resale' value, so that will most likely happen.
So in the immediate future - a downgrade.
Just what we needed....
I am not a fan of Walcott either, but the man is the leading scored in the team.....
Not if you take away the goals he scored against championship coventry and half of reading's first team he aint
Don't forget to take the goals against the same clubs away from everyone's new hero Giroud as well then
begeegs wrote:Walcott will be gone in January for a pittance and we will buy Zaha. That is believable. Zaha has 'resale' value, so that will most likely happen.
So in the immediate future - a downgrade.
Just what we needed....
I am not a fan of Walcott either, but the man is the leading scored in the team.....
Not if you take away the goals he scored against championship coventry and half of reading's first team he aint
Don't forget to take the goals against the same clubs away from everyone's new hero Giroud as well then
I will keep coming back to the 100k per week wage demand - if he is prepared to accept a reasonable wage then I would be ok (not overly happy mind) with walnut staying but he aint worth anywhere near 100k per week
begeegs wrote:Walcott will be gone in January for a pittance and we will buy Zaha. That is believable. Zaha has 'resale' value, so that will most likely happen.
So in the immediate future - a downgrade.
Just what we needed....
I am not a fan of Walcott either, but the man is the leading scored in the team.....
Not if you take away the goals he scored against championship coventry and half of reading's first team he aint
Don't forget to take the goals against the same clubs away from everyone's new hero Giroud as well then
I will keep coming back to the 100k per week wage demand - if he is prepared to accept a reasonable wage then I would be ok (not overly happy mind) with walnut staying but he aint worth anywhere near 100k per week
couldnt agree more. a total farce if we gave into them kinda wage demands on his performances over a season
You guys will never know how close we came to signing Goetze, just remember we got Eisfeld instead because of how much Dortmund wanted to keep the lad, but I am happy to have got the wrong name.
Zaha will be an Arsenal player deal is done
I say no more but remember to apologise to me when it happens.