Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 1:13 am

WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
The Gooner's Online Message Board
https://forum.onlinegooner.com/
Exactly Quartz, my initial post on the matter was to do with finishing positions in the league and the reason behind it. The amount of debt was a secondary point if you will,QuartzGooner wrote:Your above post backs up my argument!
You have quoted MM99 on how our rival's spend has increased their power on the pitch relative to ours.
It was you who then took that thought and talked of leveraged debt being the cause of our rival's debt.
But that was not MM99's argument.
His was simply saying that Arsenal are not doing as well these days because our rivals spend more.
Being in a Forum discussion with you is nonsense, because despite a genesis of an interesting view on the board, you are, whether intentional or not, unable of participating in a reasoned structured argument.
It is a complete waste of my time.
MO I was simply making the disticntion that their debt was not solely down to the speding on players whch is a critical distinction. He specifcally referred to their debt not simply to what they were spending in his initial post and when he did refer to it in subsequent posts he still did not see the clear distinction between what he was saying and what I was pointing out.QuartzGooner wrote:Your above post backs up my argument!
You have quoted MM99 on how our rival's spend has increased their power on the pitch relative to ours.
It was you who then took that thought and talked of leveraged debt being the cause of our rival's debt.
You do realize they were spnding much more than we were before Abramoivch came to Chelsea as well, by the way, don't you? Or that didn't stop us from paying our best players more to stay at Arsenal longer, which would have off-set any advantage they had financially, right?QuartzGooner wrote: But that was not MM99's argument.
His was simply saying that Arsenal are not doing as well these days because our rivals spend more.
So many easy shots to take here....naaaaahhhhhhhhh....QuartzGooner wrote:Being in a Forum discussion with you is nonsense, because whether intentional or not, you are unable of participating in a reasoned structured argument.
It is a complete waste of my time.
Nice video - he'd have to do a lot better with me thoughxDAVEYx wrote:
WHEEEEEEY! QUARTZ KILLED IT!
If I have mis-interpreted your views than I apologize though I should note yuor secondary point clearly created a different impression that simply staing we were spending less than other clubs would have. The impression your secondary point created was a drastically different one than you meant to convey so as a bit of adivice you might wish to just make the point you wish to convey. I have made this sma mistake myself and its not fun because it can lead to mis-understnading and friction that is unneeded.MM99 wrote:Exactly Quartz, my initial post on the matter was to do with finishing positions in the league and the reason behind it. The amount of debt was a secondary point if you will,QuartzGooner wrote:Your above post backs up my argument!
You have quoted MM99 on how our rival's spend has increased their power on the pitch relative to ours.
It was you who then took that thought and talked of leveraged debt being the cause of our rival's debt.
But that was not MM99's argument.
His was simply saying that Arsenal are not doing as well these days because our rivals spend more.
Being in a Forum discussion with you is nonsense, because despite a genesis of an interesting view on the board, you are, whether intentional or not, unable of participating in a reasoned structured argument.
It is a complete waste of my time.
And this I thought was some scifi/horror movie torture scene and it took several looks to figure out what it in fact isxDAVEYx wrote:
WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
DITOflash gunner wrote:Fucking 'ell
I don't want any answers as I said in my original post. All I want you to do is to show your handy work to a normal / sane person who you know and take his opinion on what he says about you and consider my points. No point in replying with a bunch of 'Z's because quite frankly I couldn't be bothered, not about the club but your agenda. The club is too big to take any of your rubbish and believe me it is rubbish (do an online poll) seriously. That's why you got bin laden, Usmanov and Hitler are signing up to your laughable petition and it is failed to garner any sort of support. The cabbie is right......10 blokes, you're havin' a laugh.USMartin wrote:Sorry Iceman but you try to take me and my views to task without - clearly without having read all of them - then tell me how to answer you so that I can't genuinely and then want me to actually consider what you have to say after that?
I hope you're not a therapist. I'd fear for your patients saftey becauise you wouldn't be looking out for it that way.
It's a shame I was looking forward to explaining some things as initially you raised some valid points.
Now if you want me to answer the serious points you made I will be happy to but on no terms whatsoever. it's up to you. I would have preferred whatever your views that we started off on a better note but you chose to post this way. Now if you want me to reply let me know otherwise
normal sevice resumed as in
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
radford agrees with the above postBring Back Pires wrote:Please stick to this. And leave my club alone.