Page 87 of 191

Re: The 'McDowell Balague Bullshit Transfer Rumours' Thread

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 9:39 pm
by SammyDroppedHisShorts
SteveO 35 wrote:86 pages in and not one tangible rumour. The transfer window Arsenal style

That done deal for Zaha seems a lifetime ago
You never stop picking on me :twisted:

Re: The 'McDowell Balague Bullshit Transfer Rumours' Thread

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:15 pm
by Top Londoner
cock thread still has legs I see.

Re: The 'McDowell Balague Bullshit Transfer Rumours' Thread

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:29 pm
by Perryashburtongroves
What are we on now? 87 bloody pages and still it goes on and still I come back here every morning, noon and night.

Re: The 'McDowell Balague Bullshit Transfer Rumours' Thread

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:32 pm
by mcdowell42
SammyDroppedHisShorts wrote:
SteveO 35 wrote:86 pages in and not one tangible rumour. The transfer window Arsenal style

That done deal for Zaha seems a lifetime ago
You never stop picking on me :twisted:


Tomorrow's Times claims Arsenal are pulling out of the race for Zaha, leaving the way clear for United :rubchin:

Re: The 'McDowell Balague Bullshit Transfer Rumours' Thread

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:33 pm
by Top Londoner
mcdowell42 wrote:
SammyDroppedHisShorts wrote:
SteveO 35 wrote:86 pages in and not one tangible rumour. The transfer window Arsenal style

That done deal for Zaha seems a lifetime ago
You never stop picking on me :twisted:


Tomorrow's Times claims Arsenal are pulling out of the race for Zaha, leaving the way clear for United :rubchin:



nice tits

Re: The 'McDowell Balague Bullshit Transfer Rumours' Thread

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:45 pm
by BournemouthRED
Zaha is not the player we need, id rather keep theo IMO

Re: The 'McDowell Balague Bullshit Transfer Rumours' Thread

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:06 pm
by I Hate Hleb
Wengerball wrote:
spendsum4uckingmoney wrote:I'm frustrated too but we need to buy the right players. We were linked with David Villa for 14m. That's absurd and counterproductive. Likewise Sneijder is on huge amounts of money and that is not a good omen. If he comes over I reckon there is no guarentee he will bother to try that hard esp when he knows he wont win anything. I would of liked us to have signed Demba Ba. Think we missed out there. Hell we could of got him for free 18 months ago. That's inexcusable really.
Thats because "we dont sign injury prone players, we make them"

:banghead:
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: The 'McDowell Balague Bullshit Transfer Rumours' Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 1:42 am
by green gooner
Perhaps we really need Laudrup and Michu :rubchin:

Re: The 'McDowell Balague Bullshit Transfer Rumours' Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:06 am
by Top Londoner
Liverpool FC: Brendan Rodgers looks to offload Nuri Sahin


http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpoo ... -32570280/


Liverpool are able to cancel the loan during the January transfer window but only with the agreement of both Sahin and Real Madrid.

The Spanish giants don't want to recall him but are understood to be frustrated by his lack of game time and would be happy to see him move to another club this month.



Aww gawd no.

Re: The 'McDowell Balague Bullshit Transfer Rumours' Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:15 am
by swimmer1
Top Londoner wrote:Liverpool FC: Brendan Rodgers looks to offload Nuri Sahin


http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpoo ... -32570280/


Liverpool are able to cancel the loan during the January transfer window but only with the agreement of both Sahin and Real Madrid.

The Spanish giants don't want to recall him but are understood to be frustrated by his lack of game time and would be happy to see him move to another club this month.



Aww gawd no.
All that talk about Nuri Sahin he turned out to be shit .

Re: The 'McDowell Balague Bullshit Transfer Rumours' Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:23 am
by augie
swimmer1 wrote:
Top Londoner wrote:Liverpool FC: Brendan Rodgers looks to offload Nuri Sahin


http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpoo ... -32570280/


Liverpool are able to cancel the loan during the January transfer window but only with the agreement of both Sahin and Real Madrid.

The Spanish giants don't want to recall him but are understood to be frustrated by his lack of game time and would be happy to see him move to another club this month.



Aww gawd no.
All that talk about Nuri Sahin he turned out to be shit .


Because he didnt work out at the bin dippers ? :? Seriously ? Just cos he hasnt worked out playing with that shower of shite dont make him a bad player. As it goes I dont know if he would be good enough or not but my impression (from limited viewing I should add) is that himself and joe allen are similar players looking to do the same job so it wouldnt have worked out then.
I should add that david villa is only a sub for barca but he would improve our team by at least 50%

Re: The 'McDowell Balague Bullshit Transfer Rumours' Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:44 am
by swimmer1
Does not look like the Shaw deal is gonna happen .

http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11700/8388178/

Re: The 'McDowell Balague Bullshit Transfer Rumours' Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:49 am
by northbank123
augie wrote:
swimmer1 wrote:
Top Londoner wrote:Liverpool FC: Brendan Rodgers looks to offload Nuri Sahin


http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpoo ... -32570280/


Liverpool are able to cancel the loan during the January transfer window but only with the agreement of both Sahin and Real Madrid.

The Spanish giants don't want to recall him but are understood to be frustrated by his lack of game time and would be happy to see him move to another club this month.



Aww gawd no.
All that talk about Nuri Sahin he turned out to be shit .


Because he didnt work out at the bin dippers ? :? Seriously ? Just cos he hasnt worked out playing with that shower of shite dont make him a bad player. As it goes I dont know if he would be good enough or not but my impression (from limited viewing I should add) is that himself and joe allen are similar players looking to do the same job so it wouldnt have worked out then.
I should add that david villa is only a sub for barca but he would improve our team by at least 50%
If he can't get in ahead of Joe Allen then that tells its own story...

Just another player like Dempsey who people were livid we didn't sign but has ultimately failed to perform to expectations at his new club. I very much imagine we'll be adding Holtby to that list in a year or so.

Re: The 'McDowell Balague Bullshit Transfer Rumours' Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:48 pm
by augie
But surely different systems suit different players so maybe the scousers system dont suit sahin ? I will say with total conviction that dempsey would have been a great buy for us and would totally have suited our non tactical formation :roll:

Re: The 'McDowell Balague Bullshit Transfer Rumours' Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 1:24 pm
by northbank123
augie wrote:But surely different systems suit different players so maybe the scousers system dont suit sahin ? I will say with total conviction that dempsey would have been a great buy for us and would totally have suited our non tactical formation :roll:
Of course, just because he failed there then there's no guarantee he would have elsewhere. Especially given that Brendan Rodgers is such an arrogant, conceited wanker who thinks he's God's gift to footballing purists that he thought that Andy Carroll had nothing to offer to that Liverpool squad, just because he doesn't rate him doesn't necessarily mean he's not good.

But imo it's just another example of fans complaining whatever the outcome. Had we signed Sahin and he had flopped (as appears likely) we'd no doubt have had many of the same people who were absolutely furious that we missed out on him complaining that Wenger was wasting huge wages on another ultimately unproven injury-prone player.