DB10GOONER wrote:
It was obvious to everybody that Diaby is injury prone and should have been released back in 2011 or maybe 2012 latest. No one could have said we didn't give him the chance to recover from his terrible injury.
He only made 16 PL appearances in 2011, 4 in 2012, 11 in 2013. Yet Wenger gave him an extended contract with a pay rise when that money could have been spent on a player that could play more than 4 times a season. Or in the case of last season; once.

Giving Diaby a 5 year contract extension was appalling financial mismanagement. He should have been offered either a pay as you play initially or at best a one year deal. The onus is on him to prove his worth to us, not the other way round ffs!
I think your timeline is wrong, mate.
From a quick "diaby contract extension" google search, it seems he was offered an extension in Dec 2009...
http://www.theguardian.com/football/200 ... w-contract
So, half way through the 2009/10 season.
in 2008/09 he made 36 appearances.
in 2008/09 he made 40 appearances.
On the back of that, you could say he was over his injury nightmare and deserving of some faith from the manager.... after all, Wenger cleatly rates him highly.
Problem was, after signing the new contract his career has gone horrifically....
2010/2011 he made 20 appearances.
2011/2012 he made 5 appearances
2012/13 he made 15 appearances
2013/14 he made 1 appearance
I don't think he signed a new contract during that injury nightmare and I'm not sure it could have been predicted at the time of the new contract.
The only debate is whether 5 years was too much for a a highly talented player who appeared to finally be over the Dan Smith leg beaker.... and yes,
It does seem excessive for a player with much to prove.