G88ner
I sincerely believe Wenger himself cannot understand why his methods are not working.
The transfer, tactical and organisational flaws are mainly so obvious that we can all see them, the pundits can, the coaches can, and so can the players.
Wenger himself presided over the 1998 - 2005 era teams that were built on solid defence mixed with fast powerful attack.
It is an
extraordinary feature of the second half of Wenger's tenure that having tried to re-invent the wheel with his smaller lighter players, then persisted with them when they were proven not to work in the Premier League.
The injuries may well be largely due to what DB10Gooner pointed out, the prevalence of smaller less muscled players less able to cope with heavy challenges, though I think there may be additional reasons related to training methods and warm-up routines. Of these latter issues, Wenger has undertaken an investigation.
He took the new contract because he genuinely believes he can still win the league. It is sad, misguided, and to me not based on anything he has done in the last nine seasons but there you go.
Yes, his public persona is quite arrogant, even prickly, and that has come as he has been criticised 2006 onwards.
Augie
augie wrote:
This old man is coining £8m per and is not being forced by the board to justify that wage
I think that in Kroenke's eyes Wenger has presided over a profitable business.
I truly believe Kroenke has a business formula that says
"Fourth place will earn a profit, but to win the title we need to spend more on transfers than we would win from prize money and tv rights so let's keep to fourth place."
augie wrote:
you suggest that he is flailing around look for something to help him get out of the quicksand (mess) he is in......again that is not an accurate comparison imo - wenker has a way of escaping the quicksand by resigning but his pride and arrogance stops him doing just that.
As I wrote above to G88ner, I really think Wenger believes he is still a competitor.
augie wrote:
Btw quartz, you stated that the existing supporters groups were created with different agendas but what are those agendas cos I don't see any agenda in motion
I am not a member of any supporters group but from the outside looking in I see them as:
Supporters Club - old school sociable and discussion group.
AISA - A little like the above but set up to promote fans' concerns with how the club is being run and the team is performing, plus minor stadium issues.
AST - Concerned with finance and share ownership and debenture ownership, now largely irrelevant.
Red Action - a pressure group campaigning for better atmosphere at home games.
BSM/We Want Our Arsenal Back - Fans group campaigning against the corporatisation of Arsenal since 2006 (and to an extent football in general since 1992). Promotes atmosphere at games and "fairer" ticket prices taking into account membership length and loyalty.
None of the above campaigns for a new manager, though it can be argued that such a campaign is within the AISA remit?
augie wrote:
Finally Quartz you will know that I have great respect for your views and I admire the way you put your views across so don't take this as a personal attack on you but the statement below is one of the saddest statements I have read from any Gooner -
"The big picture is that we are not going to win the league under Wenger and the sooner fans realise that the sooner fans will not go berzerk at a loss"
I speak from the experience of a number of friends and very loyal fans who have been life supporters and season ticket holders and followed us home and away, spent many hours texting and on Forums and reading the papers.
They shake their head and know that we ceased to be competitive, where competitive means having a genuine chance of and ambition towards the league title.
Even with the extra money behind our rivals and less funds for our team around 2006 - 2012, we largely did this to ourselves.
Not by moving stadium, but by changing a winning formula on the pitch.
It is why I want Wenger out.
The penny dropped for me during the 2010 - 2011 season, as a result of watching how the squad was assembled and from discussions on here and from reading arsenalnewsreview.co.uk where both you and I have had several letters published.
It is not at all the same as being a Wenger supporter, or celebrating fourth place.
It is just knowing that at very best this squad will finish third, likely fourth, and possibly fifth.
It is knowing this over a few seasons, so that it is no shock, no surprise.
We are not good enough, and working myself into a stupour or getting violently angry will not change that.
We are far from the level of Man City and Chelsea, have been for years, and I expect to lose against them every season until Wenger goes.
We no longer have the basics of a defence.
It is not the competitive aspirational club that it was in 1998.
A rough comparisons I might make is during the peak years of Mike Tyson.
Did you expect his opponents to win?
The fights were a foregone conclusion.
After seeing him demolish Trevor Berbick to win the title I said that the only one who can beat Tyson is Tyson himself, and that is what happened against Buster Douglas, when an undertrained, depressed, alchohol and cocaine fuelled Tyson no longer had enough left to beat a respectable and strong but technically inferior opponent.