Fabianski....safe hands?????

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
User avatar
digger
Posts: 6555
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Essex

Post by digger »

Fair enough, I'm still to be convinced by him. He makes fantastic saves, the occasional fuck up (don't care how hard it is to "scare" him, he fucked up at that throw in the first couple of minutes), no better than Almunia at present.

User avatar
RaM
Posts: 4622
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Sydney

Post by RaM »

Yeah, but how do you get the sheep off his cock long enough to get him to play?
Wayno could become a part of Wenger's backroom staff?

:lol:

woolwichgooner
Posts: 325
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 5:04 pm

Post by woolwichgooner »

digger wrote:Fair enough, I'm still to be convinced by him. He makes fantastic saves, the occasional fuck up (don't care how hard it is to "scare" him, he fucked up at that throw in the first couple of minutes), no better than Almunia at present.
Thats cool, remember goalkeepers need games too... It's one of the worst places in the sqaud been a No 2, he'll get even better when a chance of a run of games comes no doubt.

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62230
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Post by DB10GOONER »

RaM wrote:
Yeah, but how do you get the sheep off his cock long enough to get him to play?
Wayno could become a part of Wenger's backroom staff?

:lol:
:lol:

Wayno does like the... er... "backroom" doesn't he... :shock: :wink:

User avatar
digger
Posts: 6555
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Essex

Post by digger »

It's got to be worse when you're #2 to a keeper who isn't particularly world class.... at least you'd know where you stand with Cech in front of you. The problem for Fabianski is a club like Arsenal should have the very very best in goalkeeping talent, so he could easily slip down to #3.

User avatar
augie
Posts: 30995
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by augie »

The problem with the crosses issue I believe comes from watching the 1st team and seeing the blatent need for a keeper to command his area. Good intentions and also more than a little bit of over eagerness on his part but if/when it doesnt work out it leaves him susceptable to criticisms like last night. The question, as magic quite rightly says, is do you want a keeper that will try and command his area or a keeper that wont and wants his defenders to do it ? Personally I would opt for the former and I also believe that the more games the kid gets the more he will improve where as almunia is already in his 30's and is unlikely to get any better at this stage.

The problem with that last part is that a club like ours cannot really afford to give a keeper time to mature especially when the pressure is on like it is now. With that in mind I have always said that buying shay given would be far and away my preferred option in january but allowing for the fact that we all know that wenger wont buy a quality keeper then I would rather stick with fabinski

woolwichgooner
Posts: 325
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 5:04 pm

Post by woolwichgooner »

digger wrote:It's got to be worse when you're #2 to a keeper who isn't particularly world class.... at least you'd know where you stand with Cech in front of you. The problem for Fabianski is a club like Arsenal should have the very very best in goalkeeping talent, so he could easily slip down to #3.
I think in a way it's better, there's a clear competition for that spot now. In this instance we'll see what they are both made of, if they can't handle it then both do not deserve to be number 1 but Fabianski for me can make it.

User avatar
RaM
Posts: 4622
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Sydney

Post by RaM »

Wayno does like the... er... "backroom" doesn't he...
Of course. I'm sure he'd love to fill his favourite position. :lol:

User avatar
tomkingsbury
Posts: 1227
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 10:15 am
Location: coventry

Post by tomkingsbury »

i liek him but hes not ready yet - looking alot better than last season - another that needs to go on loan for a season

thegrovegooner
Posts: 178
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:57 am

Post by thegrovegooner »

my polish workmates are really suprised that he isn't our no.1. they see him as real world class.

User avatar
Boomer
Posts: 8604
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:00 am
Location: Putting the 'THE' back in the Arsenal.

Post by Boomer »

Come on guys! I think some of you are being very harsh on him.

Personally I think he's more then pushing Alumina for the No 1 spot.
Apart from the cross which wasn't a fuck up but a judgement error I still had alot of confidence in him. More convidence then I have with Alumunia.

I saw him come out for lose balls at ease, Collect crosses with confidence and made some strong saves. Not counting the save towards the end.

The problem is with all goalkeepers is that there mistakes are strongly highligted. Ramsey made some several dodgy passes and Vela lost the ball a few times. But we're not talking about them!?! (both of which players I belive will be absolutley fantastic players.)

Goal keeper don't hit there peak until the age of 30+, Seaman joined us from QPR at the age of 27, Fabianski is only 23!! and therefore is still learning the game and has another 5+ before he really hits top form. :barscarf:

User avatar
donaldo
Posts: 8175
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:33 pm
Location: The gates of hell waiting for Wenger

Post by donaldo »

Neither Almunia or Fabianski are top class.Although the mad Pole has years on his side.But that shouldnt disguse the fact that we need to sign a top quality keeper in January. We wont though

User avatar
digger
Posts: 6555
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Essex

Post by digger »

Boomer wrote:Goal keeper don't hit there peak until the age of 30+, Seaman joined us from QPR at the age of 27, Fabianski is only 23!! and therefore is still learning the game and has another 5+ before he really hits top form. :barscarf:
I think this is something of a myth. The ball moves a lot more now so keepers need to be a lot more agile (you don't get chubby lumps like Neville Southall, Tim Flowers, Chris Woods, Peter Shilton etc playing in the top leagues now)... the best keepers in the world (arguably) are Casillas and Cech.... they're both mid 20s and have been at the top for ages.

woolwichgooner
Posts: 325
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 5:04 pm

Post by woolwichgooner »

donaldo wrote:Neither Almunia or Fabianski are top class.Although the mad Pole has years on his side.But that shouldnt disguse the fact that we need to sign a top quality keeper in January. We wont though
A keeper is no where near a proity atm, that would be utter madness

thegrovegooner
Posts: 178
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:57 am

Post by thegrovegooner »

i'm happy with what we got in that department to be honest. all we need is a CDM!

Post Reply