The Gooner Forum

REBEL GOONER wrote:much ado bout nothing chunky,, a couple of our posters got there knickers in a twist over a picture of ledley king singing al jolson

Sorry Rebel but that's bollocks Radford is VERY disappointed in the manner that YOU have conducted yourself over this issue today.

images were posted on this forum that were wrong. they were then backed up by misplaced comments.

the mods DID fail this forum over the issue and then failed to respond in an adequate manner over the issue of threads being removed.

the images that were posted were shocking to say the least and the mods should have responded kind.

if the images were not shocking why were they removed?

now Radford may be many things but he won't stand for the overt shit that was posted. the two posters have responded AND THAT'S TOTALLY COOL.

BUT FOR MODS TO THEN POST THE BOLLOCKS THAT HAS JUST BEEN POSTED IS POOR TO SAY THE LEAST.

Radford would also like to add that the insensitivity shown by the mods today has been awful.

please pm Radford to have this out. as if you feel feel that showing black people with large lips and bulging eyes is ok, then SHAME ON YOU.

Its Up 4 Grabs Now wrote:

REBEL GOONER wrote:much ado bout nothing chunky,, a couple of our posters got there knickers in a twist over a picture of ledley king singing al jolson

All due respect Rebel, if the deleting of the threads was so as to avoid the debate continuing then surely both sides of the argument should be shut down. And in this case the view that it was “much ado about nothingâ€

In Radfords own unique way



zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz - boring

Radford149 wrote:Radford would also like to add that the insensitivity shown by the mods today has been awful.

please pm Radford to have this out. as if you feel feel that showing black people with large lips and bulging eyes is ok, then SHAME ON YOU.

I'm starting to see what this is about. I missed it earlier as I was travelling home on a bus sat beside a stupid bitch that just had to talk loudly on her mobile to her equally fucked in the head friend...

Chunky Monkey wrote:In Radfords own unique way



zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz - boring

sorry mate from Radford you are not old enough for this type of issue

MutleyGooner wrote:

Its Up 4 Grabs Now wrote:

REBEL GOONER wrote:much ado bout nothing chunky,, a couple of our posters got there knickers in a twist over a picture of ledley king singing al jolson

All due respect Rebel, if the deleting of the threads was so as to avoid the debate continuing then surely both sides of the argument should be shut down. And in this case the view that it was “much ado about nothingâ€

I almost made a comment on the first thread in this saga...

It was something about my belief that comedy should never be restrained.

And another something about still being unable to take someone seriously, regardless of how hard they try, when they immaturely type in the third person.

But best not say them now, wouldn't want to upset the bourgeois.

[quote="RaM"]I almost made a comment on the first thread in this saga...

It was something about my belief that comedy should never be restrained.

And another something about still being unable to take someone seriously, regardless of how hard they try, when they immaturely type in the third person.

[quote]

Radford is not surprised that you fail to understand what actually what went on.

forget the personal swipe and deal with the issue.

RaM wrote:I almost made a comment on the first thread in this saga...

It was something about my belief that comedy should never be restrained.

And another something about still being unable to take someone seriously, regardless of how hard they try, when they immaturely type in the third person.

But best not say them now, wouldn't want to upset the bourgeois.

I don't know what exactly was written or posted but I take your point about comedy. I can laugh at nearly anything but there is sometimes a fine line between funny and racism. I'm not saying anything on those threads was racist as I didn't see them.

My sense of humour is broad to say the least and I can laugh at anything that doesn't incite hatred or violence. That is my own personal definition of racism or homophobia - it is, if it incites hatred or violence; anything else (for me) is just a pisstake.

Radford youve made your point some agreed, some didnt (me being one of them). Its now time to drop it?

Radford149 wrote:

Chunky Monkey wrote:In Radfords own unique way



zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz - boring

sorry mate from Radford you are not old enough for this type of issue

don't be a ***** all your life Radders, your very quick to jump on other peoples comments and opinions and constantly ridicule other posters, you took an offence to something, now move on -

DB10GOONER wrote:

RaM wrote:I almost made a comment on the first thread in this saga...

It was something about my belief that comedy should never be restrained.

And another something about still being unable to take someone seriously, regardless of how hard they try, when they immaturely type in the third person.

But best not say them now, wouldn't want to upset the bourgeois.

I don't know what exactly was written or posted but I take your point about comedy. I can laugh at nearly anything but there is sometimes a fine line between funny and racism. I'm not saying anything on those threads was racist as I didn't see them.

My sense of humour is broad to say the least and I can laugh at anything that doesn't incite hatred or violence. That is my own personal definition of racism or homophobia - it is, if it incites hatred or violence; anything else (for me) is just a pisstake.

In this instance, as with so many, the racism was created more by the offended than the offender if that makes sense. Like most "racism" in the world anyway.

Chunky Monkey wrote:

Radford149 wrote:

Chunky Monkey wrote:In Radfords own unique way



zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz - boring

sorry mate from Radford you are not old enough for this type of issue

don't be a ***** all your life Radders, your very quick to jump on other peoples comments and opinions and constantly ridicule other posters, you took an offence to something, now move on -

radford suggest that you are nowhere near the level to respond. just leave it there. as for taking offence....you have no idea

RaM wrote:

DB10GOONER wrote:

RaM wrote:I almost made a comment on the first thread in this saga...

It was something about my belief that comedy should never be restrained.

And another something about still being unable to take someone seriously, regardless of how hard they try, when they immaturely type in the third person.

But best not say them now, wouldn't want to upset the bourgeois.

I don't know what exactly was written or posted but I take your point about comedy. I can laugh at nearly anything but there is sometimes a fine line between funny and racism. I'm not saying anything on those threads was racist as I didn't see them.

My sense of humour is broad to say the least and I can laugh at anything that doesn't incite hatred or violence. That is my own personal definition of racism or homophobia - it is, if it incites hatred or violence; anything else (for me) is just a pisstake.

In this instance, as with so many, the racism was created more by the offended than the offender if that makes sense. Like most "racism" in the world anyway.

Radford can tell you nthat you are wrong. the word racism was put forward by those who posted the images not by those that took offence.

get your facts right BEFORE YOU POST