Looks Like We have 45 million to spend? Who will you Buy?

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
User avatar
Block91Broox
Posts: 224
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:33 am

Post by Block91Broox »

Oh....and of course


GIVE EBOUE A NEW CONTRACT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PI7ES
Posts: 735
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:38 am

Post by PI7ES »

Block91Broox wrote:GK : Manuel Neuer £12m
CB : Brede Hangeland £10m
CM: Maroane Fellaini £15m
AM: Edin Hazard £8m
CF: Marouane Chamakh £Free
Everton will not sell fellani for 15 mil, that the amount they paid for him.

Jason_arsenal2010
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:44 am

Post by Jason_arsenal2010 »

PI7ES wrote:
rigsby wrote:I'ld keep Sol btw, he's a very good club man.

I wouldn't sign Melo, he looked god awful against Fulham.

We need a Keeper, 2 CBs and a DM. (excluding Chamakah)
Agree
I will say two CBs if Gallas leaves but if Wenger thinks Norvedit is ready to step up to the first team then just one world class CB.
I want us to sign a keeper aswell but its just that when Wenger puts faith in players then its very hard to shake it and he has tremendous faith in Fabianski. HE is a fantastic shot stopper but does fumble and lets in very stupid goals which if he can improve upon then we will have a very good keeper on our hand
DM player maybe one who can play in the CM role and A DM role will be someone who I will go for more like Veleso or a Melo

Jason_arsenal2010
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:44 am

Post by Jason_arsenal2010 »

Block91Broox wrote:GK : Manuel Neuer £12m
CB : Brede Hangeland £10m
CM: Maroane Fellaini £15m
AM: Edin Hazard £8m
CF: Marouane Chamakh £Free
I like Fellani a lot but isnt too injury prone and someone brought up a very good point on Hangeand. He is very slow and we play a very high line which will mean long balls being played behind him and him become very useless
Neur I love and will love to see him at us same for Hazard alhtough I will say he's more of a replacement for Arshavin

PI7ES
Posts: 735
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:38 am

Post by PI7ES »

Noredvit has played DM in every game whilst on loan, not sure he is going to be good enough to play CB in the prem.


We need 4 CB's in the squad atm signed up for next season we have 2 at a push, that depends on how djourou recovers from not playing for a year. We need 2 more even if gallas signs in my opinion.

User avatar
thatgooner
Posts: 775
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 5:19 pm

Post by thatgooner »

Veleso, we surely could get, he's been linked with Aston Villa.

To add another name to the hat... Danielle de Rossi, bit of a beast, but Roma are looking like the team to be at in italy, so i cant imagine he'd leave.

User avatar
Boomer
Posts: 8604
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:00 am
Location: Putting the 'THE' back in the Arsenal.

Post by Boomer »

Jason_arsenal2010 wrote:
digger wrote:You've all forgotten.... a £45m "kitty" at Arsenal includes transfers.

Chamakh is therefore not free. He'll probably get 90k per week, and a 3 year deal = £15m.

I'd like us to sign a keeper... We were linked with Sebastian Frey (£15m transfer fee, plus 3 years @ 60k = £10m)

That's £40m already :)
Chamak 90K not it will be more like 50-70K not more than that and a 45 Million transfer kitting doesn't include wages I think since you pay them weekly with the revenues you make from matchdays, shirt sales and so on
No, Diggers right. Whatever the kitty is includes the contract of the deals. It's the way Arsenal report then. So this also applies to renegotiations.

Can't see it mentioned so Where's this figure £45M from? is there a link or what?

Regarding Chamak I don't think he's 100% free (£0). Liverpool pulled out as he wanted a signing on fee which was £4M (?). So I wouldn't be surprised to hear if this was the case. Wenger would live with that!

Jason_arsenal2010
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:44 am

Post by Jason_arsenal2010 »

PI7ES wrote:Noredvit has played DM in every game whilst on loan, not sure he is going to be good enough to play CB in the prem.


We need 4 CB's in the squad atm signed up for next season we have 2 at a push, that depends on how djourou recovers from not playing for a year. We need 2 more even if gallas signs in my opinion.
Norvedit was signed as a CB and he has been awfull in his loan spell by any standards and I think Djourou will be fine but I think he's very slow and needs to increase his speed
If gallas leaves
then Djourou, Vermaelen, ? world class CB, Norvedit, Stefan Savic and keep Sol as backup
More about Stefan Savic

Code: Select all

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan_Savi%C4%87

Code: Select all

http://younggunsblog.co.uk/2010/02/arsenal-delay-savic-negotiations-until-the-summer-2/

PI7ES
Posts: 735
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:38 am

Post by PI7ES »

Would you be happy with a totall unknown savic coming in for a injured player at old trafford?

No me either, we must have 4 proven quality CB's all the other top four sides do.

Jason_arsenal2010
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:44 am

Post by Jason_arsenal2010 »

thatgooner wrote:Veleso, we surely could get, he's been linked with Aston Villa.

To add another name to the hat... Danielle de Rossi, bit of a beast, but Roma are looking like the team to be at in italy, so i cant imagine he'd leave.
Rossi is too far away for me I think but Veleso is not just being looked at by Villa but also United and Inter and Lisbon have very good relations with United so I doubt if they really want him then we can get him
I think Melo is the real deal and what he did at Florentina is being overshadowed with what's happening in JUve

Jason_arsenal2010
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:44 am

Post by Jason_arsenal2010 »

PI7ES wrote:Would you be happy with a totall unknown savic coming in for a injured player at old trafford?

No me either, we must have 4 proven quality CB's all the other top four sides do.
isn't rafael playing for united even though he's just 19 and we will have Sol if Wengers not ready to take the risk with Savic
Last edited by Jason_arsenal2010 on Wed Apr 14, 2010 12:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
GunnerDude
Posts: 3176
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 12:57 pm
Location: Here with Christina Hendricks

Post by GunnerDude »

Boomer wrote:
Jason_arsenal2010 wrote:
digger wrote:You've all forgotten.... a £45m "kitty" at Arsenal includes transfers.

Chamakh is therefore not free. He'll probably get 90k per week, and a 3 year deal = £15m.

I'd like us to sign a keeper... We were linked with Sebastian Frey (£15m transfer fee, plus 3 years @ 60k = £10m)

That's £40m already :)
Chamak 90K not it will be more like 50-70K not more than that and a 45 Million transfer kitting doesn't include wages I think since you pay them weekly with the revenues you make from matchdays, shirt sales and so on
No, Diggers right. Whatever the kitty is includes the contract of the deals. It's the way Arsenal report then. So this also applies to renegotiations.

Can't see it mentioned so Where's this figure £45M from? is there a link or what?

Regarding Chamak I don't think he's 100% free (£0). Liverpool pulled out as he wanted a signing on fee which was £4M (?). So I wouldn't be surprised to hear if this was the case. Wenger would live with that!
Chamakh made it clear of his intent to play for us, more than any player I have seen :shock: so liverpool had no chance and yes there is a signing on fee for any player on a bossman.

For example, Ribery is about to run down his contract with Bayern on my football manager, he requests £150,000-£170,000 and a £4.9mill signing on fee. Unlike Arsene I have let go of some deadwood to be prepared for negotiaitions like this and I will get my man hopefully for £125,000 or less :twisted:

User avatar
euphoricone
Posts: 566
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:02 am

Post by euphoricone »

1)Georcuff--15 mill
2)chamakh--free
3)hangeland--15 mil
4)hart--whatever it takes

Jason_arsenal2010
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:44 am

Post by Jason_arsenal2010 »

GunnerDude wrote:
Boomer wrote:
Jason_arsenal2010 wrote:
digger wrote:You've all forgotten.... a £45m "kitty" at Arsenal includes transfers.

Chamakh is therefore not free. He'll probably get 90k per week, and a 3 year deal = £15m.

I'd like us to sign a keeper... We were linked with Sebastian Frey (£15m transfer fee, plus 3 years @ 60k = £10m)

That's £40m already :)
Chamak 90K not it will be more like 50-70K not more than that and a 45 Million transfer kitting doesn't include wages I think since you pay them weekly with the revenues you make from matchdays, shirt sales and so on
No, Diggers right. Whatever the kitty is includes the contract of the deals. It's the way Arsenal report then. So this also applies to renegotiations.

Can't see it mentioned so Where's this figure £45M from? is there a link or what?

Regarding Chamak I don't think he's 100% free (£0). Liverpool pulled out as he wanted a signing on fee which was £4M (?). So I wouldn't be surprised to hear if this was the case. Wenger would live with that!
Chamakh made it clear of his intent to play for us, more than any player I have seen :shock: so liverpool had no chance and yes there is a signing on fee for any player on a bossman.

For example, Ribery is about to run down his contract with Bayern on my football manager, he requests £150,000-£170,000 and a £4.9mill signing on fee. Unlike Arsene I have let go of some deadwood to be prepared for negotiaitions like this and I will get my man hopefully for £125,000 or less :twisted:
who are you going to get and who's the deadwood

User avatar
Boomer
Posts: 8604
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:00 am
Location: Putting the 'THE' back in the Arsenal.

Post by Boomer »

Can we answer the question of where the knowledge of the £45M has come from? Or is it made up!?

Post Reply