ANOTHER CHELSKI CONSPIRACY STARRING STEVIE G

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
CraigPollard
Posts: 371
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 3:44 pm
Location: Portsmouth

Post by CraigPollard »

flash gunner wrote:
rolypoly wrote:flash

i forgot to mention. i do know who killed jfk but so do many others. read the book, see the movie. it aint a secret
Jack Ruby wasnt it? :? :wink:

Italian football is the most corrupt in the world and being in the know on that one isnt much of a coup Roly, a game last month was heavily betted on and the result came out it was in EVERY daily newspaper so i doubt your mate was quite in the know. If you analised every match involving every team you would find incidents that anyone could claim were fixed Fabianski against Wigan, Gerrards back pass against us for Henrys winner in 2006, Sol Campbells disallowed goal for England against Argentina in 1998 world cup, my perectly good goal against pollard reserves in a 2-1 defeat of my Sunday league game back in 1995 :wink: and these are just a few off the top of my head thats the game unpredictable not corrupt
EH???????

:lol:

User avatar
goonersid
Posts: 8838
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 9:40 am
Location: DERRY CITY

Post by goonersid »

Yeah I think something has sent you over the edge this time Roly. :wink:

User avatar
flash gunner
Posts: 29243
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:55 am
Location: Armchairsville. FACT.

Post by flash gunner »

rolypoly wrote:flash

open your eyes

that you mentioned a previous stevie g back pass is the very point. naive innocents like you will believe cos it was accident once, therefore it was accident this time around. the fixers rely on the majority like you giving stevie g the benefit of the doubt. thats how thebest fixes work -simplicity and in frontof everyone`s eyes -just like a magician doing his tricks in front of little gullible kiddies

the italian match i refer to was a different one. nothing in papers about it. all to do with draw suiting both clubs.
So the foundations for this scam ie his backpass on Sunday were laid 4 years ago :shock: Roly you need to have a lay down in a dark room mate

User avatar
marcengels
Posts: 7208
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 11:12 pm
Location: North Bank

Post by marcengels »

goonersid wrote:Yeah I think something has sent you over the edge this time Roly. :wink:
roly laughs in the face of the edge, accuses it of corruption and drinking lager, then tells the edge that it's a moron and dickhead :)

And I'm not talking about the U2 Edge...although he is a *word censored* :wink:

User avatar
Bring Back Pires
Posts: 2977
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 3:23 pm

Post by Bring Back Pires »

My question for "Roly Poly" is this:

Where does this fit into the Gerrard conspiracy theory, if at all?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOIzXEdVDa0

User avatar
flash gunner
Posts: 29243
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:55 am
Location: Armchairsville. FACT.

Post by flash gunner »

Bring Back Pires wrote:My question for "Roly Poly" is this:

Where does this fit into the Gerrard conspiracy theory, if at all?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOIzXEdVDa0
Its been covered. Gerrard passed to Henry on purpose so that 4 years later when Chelsea needed to beat Liverpool to get nearer the championship he could do it again and no one would notice :shock:

:coffeespit:

User avatar
highburyJD
Posts: 4982
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:36 pm
Location: Highbury

Post by highburyJD »

personlly I think in the last few years I think more dodgy decisions have gone against chavski than for them

User avatar
Bring Back Pires
Posts: 2977
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 3:23 pm

Post by Bring Back Pires »

flash gunner wrote:
Bring Back Pires wrote:My question for "Roly Poly" is this:

Where does this fit into the Gerrard conspiracy theory, if at all?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOIzXEdVDa0
Its been covered. Gerrard passed to Henry on purpose so that 4 years later when Chelsea needed to beat Liverpool to get nearer the championship he could do it again and no one would notice :shock:

:coffeespit:
And how would he have known that Chelsea and Liverpool were going to meet in the CL four years later, pray tell? Oh forget it, it's clearly a waste of time.

Speaking of the CL, I had a rather dreaded (and a tad off-topic) thought earlier today: Chelsea vs. Tottenham CL final at Wembley next season?

rolypoly
Posts: 644
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:52 am
Location: heaven

Post by rolypoly »

flash

strangely enough am not suggesting planned four years ago but dont have patiece or time and have to put trust in either you having intelligence to work it out or someone else to explain.

engels

you give yourself a name of a philosopher presumably to suggest intelligence, i do not use any stronger language than "naive "resisting abuse. normally i get condemned for abuse. now i dont use abuse, you accuse me of doing so or try to provoke me.

not only are you an insult to your chosen name, you are a moron and as thats being kind to you and giving you the benefit of the doubt can hardly be regarded as abusive. now if you aint got anything worthwhile to say bog off and get off my thread.

User avatar
marcengels
Posts: 7208
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 11:12 pm
Location: North Bank

Post by marcengels »

rolypoly wrote:flash

strangely enough am not suggesting planned four years ago but dont have patiece or time and have to put trust in either you having intelligence to work it out or someone else to explain.

engels

you give yourself a name of a philosopher presumably to suggest intelligence, i do not use any stronger language than "naive "resisting abuse. normally i get condemned for abuse. now i dont use abuse, you accuse me of doing so or try to provoke me.

not only are you an insult to your chosen name, you are a moron and as thats being kind to you and giving you the benefit of the doubt can hardly be regarded as abusive. now if you aint got anything worthwhile to say bog off and get off my thread.
No thread belongs to you roly, no matter how big your ego is.

The item was a joke, no more, and not that I have to explain myself but you appear not to understand.

You have called people all sorts of names on here over the years, do you want to me to find and quote them?

Don't embarass yourself again and try and intimidate me. Just contend yourself with the mindless idiocy of your conspiritorial world.

And that's me being kind :lol:

By the way...You're welcome :wink:

User avatar
highburyJD
Posts: 4982
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:36 pm
Location: Highbury

Post by highburyJD »

can we play nice please
(remember I'm watching all of you)

rolypoly
Posts: 644
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:52 am
Location: heaven

Post by rolypoly »

engels

hope in your next life you dont come back as a fish cos you wont survive long.

touchy and precious.

and if i am an idiot at least i had 55000 grand to comfort me which was 55000 grand more than you cos you did not believe

so yah boo to you

User avatar
xDAVEYx
Posts: 3185
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 9:38 pm
Location: block 12, row 25

Post by xDAVEYx »

Roly,

If you're going to write out your winnings as a colloquialism, there's no need to do the zeros, 55 grand would suffice.

Also, nice to see you figured out how to use a full stop, mad props to YOU m'lud!

rolypoly
Posts: 644
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:52 am
Location: heaven

Post by rolypoly »

davey

i stand corrected but typing aint my forte

User avatar
marcengels
Posts: 7208
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 11:12 pm
Location: North Bank

Post by marcengels »

rolypoly wrote:engels

hope in your next life you dont come back as a fish cos you wont survive long.

touchy and precious.

and if i am an idiot at least i had 55000 grand to comfort me which was 55000 grand more than you cos you did not believe

so yah boo to you
so you're showing off your (imagined :lol: ) wealth in a "I've got more than you" way. Says something about your personality roly, borne out by evidence on here. I just call it as I see it, and don't fear putting some noses out of joint, thought you'd appreciate that? :roll: :)

And if I come back as a fish, I want to come back as a Piranha

I can only think you'll come back as Cod :wink:

Post Reply