Joe Hart to Sunderland???

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
User avatar
Bergkamp-Genius
Posts: 1774
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:19 pm

Post by Bergkamp-Genius »

If Citeh are even considering loaning him out...it's not exactly a vote of confidence for Hart...therefore a bid from a top club i'm sure will turn his head and make him agitate for a move...of course that's far too obvious a tactic for AW...

:banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

mrgnu1958
Posts: 13369
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:32 pm
Location: ESSEX

Post by mrgnu1958 »

if we start with the 2 clowns,we are fecked :twisted: :twisted:

User avatar
merson_is_god
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:43 am
Location: At the computer

Post by merson_is_god »

Agreed GNUey, we will be fucked!

rigsby
Posts: 3046
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:52 am

Post by rigsby »

Man City will never ever ever ever ever ever sell Joe Hart especially to Arsenal.

Get Over It

User avatar
augie
Posts: 30984
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by augie »

rigsby wrote:Man City will never ever ever ever ever ever sell Joe Hart especially to Arsenal.

Get Over It

Agreed but I do think that we should throw the cat amongst the pidgeons by making an offer for shay given - if man shitty turn it down I would guess that hart might start wondering where that leaves him and might stir things up a bit then. The only way that hart might be sold is if he is not first choice and then demands a move 8)

User avatar
brazilianGOONER
Posts: 9208
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:27 am
Location: i think we're parked, man
Contact:

Post by brazilianGOONER »

Boomer wrote:
brazilianGOONER wrote:why would sunderland loan hart? what about gordon?
Gordons injured.
Can't remember what (and can't be arsed to search) but he broke somethink early in pre-season.
A short term loan for Hart would make sence.
cheers boomer.

craig's injured? perfect keeper for arsenal then 8)

mikeyb772001
Posts: 4569
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:03 pm
Location: Block 6! Drunk and standing next to a mad man with no clothes on!

Post by mikeyb772001 »

augie wrote:
rigsby wrote:Man City will never ever ever ever ever ever sell Joe Hart especially to Arsenal.

Get Over It

Agreed but I do think that we should throw the cat amongst the pidgeons by making an offer for shay given - if man shitty turn it down I would guess that hart might start wondering where that leaves him and might stir things up a bit then. The only way that hart might be sold is if he is not first choice and then demands a move 8)
I agree Augie. But sadly Given is to good for Wenger to sign. Also he is proven in the prem so again no good For Mr Wenger

User avatar
donaldo
Posts: 8175
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:33 pm
Location: The gates of hell waiting for Wenger

Post by donaldo »

rigsby wrote:Man City will never ever ever ever ever ever sell Joe Hart especially to Arsenal.
And Wenger will never ever ever ever ever ever sign him :banghead:

For the same reason he didnt sign Given two years ago :banghead: It would kill Flappys career.

User avatar
BT
Posts: 1591
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: London

Post by BT »

City hold the cards here though. Play Given for a few more years before he's past his peak, while loaning Hart out to a team that isn't direct competition to them, keeping them both on a nice wage (am i right in thinking the parent club still pays the wages?!). Either way, City have no reason to engage in negotitians with Arsenal. Money is power. We should have gone for Given when he first went for a move.

mikeyb772001
Posts: 4569
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:03 pm
Location: Block 6! Drunk and standing next to a mad man with no clothes on!

Post by mikeyb772001 »

donaldo wrote:
rigsby wrote:Man City will never ever ever ever ever ever sell Joe Hart especially to Arsenal.
And Wenger will never ever ever ever ever ever sign him :banghead:

For the same reason he didnt sign Given two years ago.
Nilain Levroji!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I love this new keeper were linked with! Ive never heard of him, he is unheard of even on google 3 pages worth of info that isnt even all him, ive never seen a pic of him and his name would make a great song!

If we do by chance get this guy (who sources say a deal is nearly done) i really will give up the will to live!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :banghead: :banghead:

User avatar
Boomer
Posts: 8604
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:00 am
Location: Putting the 'THE' back in the Arsenal.

Post by Boomer »

BT wrote:City hold the cards here though. Play Given for a few more years before he's past his peak, while loaning Hart out to a team that isn't direct competition to them, keeping them both on a nice wage (am i right in thinking the parent club still pays the wages?!). Either way, City have no reason to engage in negotitians with Arsenal. Money is power. We should have gone for Given when he first went for a move.
According to football manager :lol: (okay it's fairly accurate!)
it's all down to the terms of the loan.

Some lower division clubs may not pay for our loanees or if the do a certain weekly percentage. Still in both clubs interests lower club gets a free (young) player for a year whilst the parent club is able to provide playing time.

In Harts case I'm sure if any deal was done the wages would be paid in full.

Again like the wages there's usually a fee involved as well.
I think Celtic (reportedly) paid the sp*ds something ridiculous like £2M for the loan last year! :shock: :roll:

rigsby
Posts: 3046
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:52 am

Post by rigsby »

And Wenger will never ever ever ever ever ever sign him

For the same reason he didnt sign Given two years ago It would kill Flappys career.
Well if he was gettable maybe he would. But he isn't. You cannot pin not signing Joe Hart on Wenger. Its ridiculous

User avatar
augie
Posts: 30984
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by augie »

BT wrote:City hold the cards here though. Play Given for a few more years before he's past his peak, while loaning Hart out to a team that isn't direct competition to them, keeping them both on a nice wage (am i right in thinking the parent club still pays the wages?!). Either way, City have no reason to engage in negotitians with Arsenal. Money is power. We should have gone for Given when he first went for a move.

Thing is though that man shitty might also want to keep joe hart cos of the home grown rule as he would qualify as home grown while I think shay given wouldnt. Man shitty have a load of foreign players so home grown players might be a commodity for them

jrthgooner
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:24 am

Post by jrthgooner »

Joe Hart cost City £600K as adown payment rising to £1.5m with add ons. What did we pay for Flapianski?? With our great scouting network that eveyone bangs on about how did we miss out on Hart the first time but end up with the crap keepers we have at present??

Hart is now available and we need a goalkeeper who will help us keep clean sheets by making crucial saves in top games, not another season of blunders and a defense who have no idea what the bloke behind them is going to do next.

If we don't test City with a serious cash offer or even a loan offer how will we know what they want to do with him?

mikeyb772001
Posts: 4569
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:03 pm
Location: Block 6! Drunk and standing next to a mad man with no clothes on!

Post by mikeyb772001 »

Were getting Nilain Levroji are season is saved! he is the best keeper ever :banghead:

Post Reply