
Chamakh injured
- OneBardGooner
- Posts: 48221
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
- Location: Close To The Edge
-
- Posts: 2645
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 10:39 am
- Location: Living next door to my neighbours
- OneBardGooner
- Posts: 48221
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
- Location: Close To The Edge
- STLgooner89
- Posts: 342
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:50 am
- Location: st. louis
Seriously red member? Wow.....that could be the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Like he said they have four other strikers who have already provedn they can find the net multiple times. Rooney didn't even score in open play til new years day last season and I'm preeeeetty sure they still won the titleMacca wrote:Red Member wrote:Isn't that the same for a lot of clubs though?
watch Man Utd collapse if Rooney gets injured
Wrong. Utd fall back on Berbatov (top scorer last season), Owen, Hernandez, Wellbeck.
- Steviegooner
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:23 pm
- Location: London
-
- Posts: 1108
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:22 pm
- Location: Block 4
- Contact:
No Definatly not,Red Member wrote:Isn't that the same for a lot of clubs though?
watch Man Utd collapse if Rooney gets injured
Park will be fine if he got a run in the side. He looks an out and out goalscorer. He would benefit from Wilshere's return though.
Chelsea: Torres, Drogba, Anelka, Sturidge, Lukaku,
Man City, Aguero, Dzeko, Balotelli, Tevez??
Man Utd, Rooney, Hernandez, Berbatov, Welbeck,
All the above are better than Crapsack Chamakh, and all have depth for cover, i cannot judge on park yet but if RVP gets a injury we are fucked in my opinion,
-
- Posts: 1898
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:14 am
- Location: London
- STLgooner89
- Posts: 342
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:50 am
- Location: st. louis