Chamakh

supergeorgegraham · Post by **supergeorgegraham** » Tue Apr 03, 2012 8:03 am

Its funny how Bendtner finally has a few good games and the Press start talking about him coming back here. If this season has taught us anything then its the importance of a striker who takes his chances on a regular basis. Looking at Torres and Carroll and the massive massive cost to the clubs and the fans !
At home we have to part with Bendtner, Chamkah, Park and Vela. If this does not happen then Wenger should take out 250,000 a week and burn it. At least he will receive a small amount of heat for his money.
Before Chamkah was smoking a pipe of peace he has been a huge failure and I hate looking at his weird head when he comes on anyway.

Babatunde · Post by **Babatunde** » Tue Apr 03, 2012 8:21 am

Another brilliant 'bit of business' by Arsene Wenger.
Fergie can keep winning titles, Arsene can keep winning 4th place trophies and acting like an arrogant loser...

Red Member · Post by **Red Member** » Tue Apr 03, 2012 8:28 am

any reason to get rid of the camel is to be welcomed.

i actually think it would be worthwhile paying a club to take him on.
it will be difficult to get rid of him lets face it. I have seen better non league players than him

donaldo · Post by **donaldo** » Tue Apr 03, 2012 8:33 am

Get rid of Chamakh but the idiot who bought him will still be here

As Baba says Utd have Hernandez Welbeck and Berbatov as back up strikers we have Chamakh and Park.You couldnt make it up.

Red Member · Post by **Red Member** » Tue Apr 03, 2012 8:48 am

donaldo wrote:Get rid of Chamakh but the idiot who bought him will still be here

As Baba says Utd have Hernandez Welbeck and Berbatov as back up strikers we have Chamakh and Park.You couldnt make it up.

no manager gets every signing right and anyway Chamakh was a free transfer so nothing lost on him was there?
how about the fact that Wenger signed the OX last summer? how many other teenagers have made such an impact at the top of the PL this season. Not only did Wenger BUY the OX but he has showed his managerial genius by using him at the right times to get the best out of him.

RoscommonGooner · Post by **RoscommonGooner** » Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:04 am

Red Member wrote:
no manager gets every signing right and anyway Chamakh was a free transfer so nothing lost on him was there?
how about the fact that Wenger signed the OX last summer? how many other teenagers have made such an impact at the top of the PL this season. Not only did Wenger BUY the OX but he has showed his managerial genius by using him at the right times to get the best out of him.

Except crazy wages.

Anywho, I really couldn't give a crap what he gets up to in the evenings. Gone beyond careing when it comes to this numpty.

Red Member · Post by **Red Member** » Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:10 am

I have said it before and I will say it again - Chamakh is the worst striker that I have ever seen play for Arsenal

LDB · Post by **LDB** » Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:12 am

Red Member wrote:I have said it before and I will say it again - Chamakh is the worst striker that I have ever seen play for Arsenal

Agree. Arsenal vs Udinese, 2011. Easily the worst performance of an Arsenal striker that I have ever seen live.

hugh jardon · Post by **hugh jardon** » Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:39 am

Typical modern sensationalist journalism. Mountain out of a mole hill stuff. Why has this 'story' even made the papers? Perhaps the slowest news day ever?

Post by **flash gunner** » Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:39 am

the moog wrote:the fact of the matter is that footballers are friends. would you not go out with your mate after a game even if he played for the opposition?

yes he may be a poor player but to have a pop at him over this makes no sense.

I actually agree with this^^^

Red Member · Post by **Red Member** » Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:40 am

LDB wrote:
Red Member wrote:I have said it before and I will say it again - Chamakh is the worst striker that I have ever seen play for Arsenal
Agree. Arsenal vs Udinese, 2011. Easily the worst performance of an Arsenal striker that I have ever seen live.

yes I was there for that.
forgot that he played tbh

Post by **flash gunner** » Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:41 am

Red Member wrote:
LDB wrote:
Red Member wrote:I have said it before and I will say it again - Chamakh is the worst striker that I have ever seen play for Arsenal
Agree. Arsenal vs Udinese, 2011. Easily the worst performance of an Arsenal striker that I have ever seen live.
yes I was there for that.
forgot that he played tbh

You must have been drunk from all the half time lagers

Babatunde · Post by **Babatunde** » Tue Apr 03, 2012 10:14 am

It really is incredible when you think about it. The 'economic genius' Arsene Wenger, has wasted over £60k a week on Chamakh for the past 2 years. I'll take a look at Mike Ashley at Newcastle and Pardew...so lemme see...they also sold their star striker (as we will be this summer). Carroll sold for £35 mil. Wage bill drastically reduced? Check. All the wasters on silly wages cleared off.

Then what did they do? Theyn signed Tiote (who is far superior to Song in every facet) for £2 mil. Papiss Cisse, signed for £10 mil, better than everyone at Arsenal bar RVP. Demba Ba, one of the players of the season, who would waltz into our team in a front 2, signed for a pitance. Hatem Ben Arfa, handy player, signed at no great cost. And what is that I see?

ALAN PARDEW, with a net spend of Zero, having made a profit on player trading, and with a wage bill that is under £70 mil, (over £50 mil less than Wenger then) has managed to take a team, improve them and is challenging Wenger for CL football. I said this at the start of the season and was mocked but I don't look so silly now: Newcastle have a better pool of players than Arsenal. Fact. What Arsenal do have, is more money and a better first eleven. But look at their midfield options , look at that pool of strikers: Ba, Cisse etc....Where Wenger is playing Ramsey in left midfield, they have Ben Arfa. Name Arsenal's creative spark this season please? (and don't bore me with injuries either).

Wenger is a fraud, I have said this a million times. He is the fourth highest paid manager in world football, yet you wonder what he is being paid all that money for. If Pardew can challenge for CL football and get a point at Old Trafford (not lose 8-2 then), and thrash Man U 3-0 at home; if Moyes can get Everton in the top 4 on a shoestring budget; if Redknapp can be in an FA Cup semi, get CL footie on a lower wage bill etc...

I ask again: just WHAT is Arsene Wenger good for?

Post by **flash gunner** » Tue Apr 03, 2012 10:18 am

Babatunde how comes youve come back to the forum once a 7 game winning streak ends?

Post by **I Hate Hleb** » Tue Apr 03, 2012 10:20 am

Babatunde wrote:.....

I ask again: just WHAT is Arsene Wenger good for?

Which automatically brings to mind this famous little ditty:

Wen - ger.
What is he good for?
Absolutely nothing.
(Say it again!!)

Wen - ger,
What is he good for?
Absolutely nothing.

Chamakh

Re: Chamakh

Re: Chamakh

Re: Chamakh

Re: Chamakh

Re: Chamakh

Re: Chamakh

Re: Chamakh

Re: Chamakh

Re: Chamakh

Re: Chamakh

Re: Chamakh

Re: Chamakh

Re: Chamakh

Re: Chamakh

Re: Chamakh