You're welcome.


Thanksarseofacrow wrote:We have a large wage bill, which contains very few players on very high wages (due to our much publicised wage structure), so therefore it is fair to assume that we must have many young/squad players on relatively (to competitors) high wages. We have alot of shit within that squad, and therefore we must be paying shit players high wages.
You're welcome.![]()
g88ner wrote:Thanksarseofacrow wrote:We have a large wage bill, which contains very few players on very high wages (due to our much publicised wage structure), so therefore it is fair to assume that we must have many young/squad players on relatively (to competitors) high wages. We have alot of shit within that squad, and therefore we must be paying shit players high wages.
You're welcome.![]()
![]()
By the way, I don't doubt that for a second... I think we all get the gist of our ridiculous wage structure, but I don't see how people can be so sure that Denilson earns x amount, and Almunia earns y amount, etc. and more to the point, how Baba has Wenger's wages fluctuating between £6-7.5m?!![]()
(presumably, Baba is recalculating based on weekly performance targets?
)
Its gone up to 8 now see the rumour threadg88ner wrote:Thanksarseofacrow wrote:We have a large wage bill, which contains very few players on very high wages (due to our much publicised wage structure), so therefore it is fair to assume that we must have many young/squad players on relatively (to competitors) high wages. We have alot of shit within that squad, and therefore we must be paying shit players high wages.
You're welcome.![]()
![]()
By the way, I don't doubt that for a second... I think we all get the gist of our ridiculous wage structure, but I don't see how people can be so sure that Denilson earns x amount, and Almunia earns y amount, etc. and more to the point, how Baba has Wenger's wages fluctuating between £6-7.5m?!![]()
(presumably, Baba is recalculating based on weekly performance targets?
)
Can you please let frankbutcher know. He'll be really pleased to hear thathugh jardon wrote:Good thread topic.
frankbutcher wrote:I've handed the baton over to you guys to start all these great incisive and witty threads that you're looking for. COME ON SON I'M WAITING.Entertain the rest of the forum with some classic threads. I'm serious. Don't come back at me and claim this that and the other about whether I am addicted to the forum or not. Start some really good threads.
Over to you....
flash gunner wrote:Its gone up to 8 now see the rumour threadg88ner wrote:Thanksarseofacrow wrote:We have a large wage bill, which contains very few players on very high wages (due to our much publicised wage structure), so therefore it is fair to assume that we must have many young/squad players on relatively (to competitors) high wages. We have alot of shit within that squad, and therefore we must be paying shit players high wages.
You're welcome.![]()
![]()
By the way, I don't doubt that for a second... I think we all get the gist of our ridiculous wage structure, but I don't see how people can be so sure that Denilson earns x amount, and Almunia earns y amount, etc. and more to the point, how Baba has Wenger's wages fluctuating between £6-7.5m?!![]()
(presumably, Baba is recalculating based on weekly performance targets?
)
mcdowell42 wrote:flash gunner wrote:Its gone up to 8 now see the rumour threadg88ner wrote:Thanksarseofacrow wrote:We have a large wage bill, which contains very few players on very high wages (due to our much publicised wage structure), so therefore it is fair to assume that we must have many young/squad players on relatively (to competitors) high wages. We have alot of shit within that squad, and therefore we must be paying shit players high wages.
You're welcome.![]()
![]()
By the way, I don't doubt that for a second... I think we all get the gist of our ridiculous wage structure, but I don't see how people can be so sure that Denilson earns x amount, and Almunia earns y amount, etc. and more to the point, how Baba has Wenger's wages fluctuating between £6-7.5m?!![]()
(presumably, Baba is recalculating based on weekly performance targets?
)
See how good the rumour thread is people have started to use posts on it as a point of reference
flash gunner wrote:mcdowell42 wrote:flash gunner wrote:Its gone up to 8 now see the rumour threadg88ner wrote:Thanksarseofacrow wrote:We have a large wage bill, which contains very few players on very high wages (due to our much publicised wage structure), so therefore it is fair to assume that we must have many young/squad players on relatively (to competitors) high wages. We have alot of shit within that squad, and therefore we must be paying shit players high wages.
You're welcome.![]()
![]()
By the way, I don't doubt that for a second... I think we all get the gist of our ridiculous wage structure, but I don't see how people can be so sure that Denilson earns x amount, and Almunia earns y amount, etc. and more to the point, how Baba has Wenger's wages fluctuating between £6-7.5m?!![]()
(presumably, Baba is recalculating based on weekly performance targets?
)
See how good the rumour thread is people have started to use posts on it as a point of referenceI prefered it when you talked about butter
Agreed. I don't think anyone doubts we should be spending our money more efficiently, but if it's true that we have the 5th highest wage bill in England, then finishing 3rd could be considered above par.Vinny1967 wrote: So I suppose it can be argued that we are punching above our weight with our League position and regular 3/4th place trophy when compared with others.
Absolutely; we need to be much smarter. Last summer was a farce!Vinny1967 wrote:To that end we have to work smarter and not have the debacle we had last year of the signings on the last day of the transfer window when the season is already 3 weeks old![]()
Agreed, but when the other four teams offer more in wages and transfer fees, then it's difficult to keep up.flash gunner wrote:Why do wages have to correlate to league positions? There is more to being a football team than how much people earn, i understand that supposedly the more you pay the better players you get but there is more to football than that ie tactics, producing a team with compatible playing members etc etc etc.... Because we are the 5th highest payers doesnt mean that anywhere above 5th is good
I agree and disagree at the same time. Not unusual for meflash gunner wrote:Why do wages have to correlate to league positions? There is more to being a football team than how much people earn, i understand that supposedly the more you pay the better players you get but there is more to football than that ie tactics, producing a team with compatible playing members etc etc etc.... Because we are the 5th highest payers doesnt mean that anywhere above 5th is good