The Gooner Forum

Henry Norris 1913 wrote:And did you check with the mods to see if joking about paedophilia is ok? I hear there is a no tolerance attitude? Or are you a member of the infamous gay clique?

And then check if some of our dumber members can see the huge difference between comparing an innocent man to a convicted child molester in a childishly hateful way and light heartedly alluding to something that didn't happen...

begeegs wrote:Damnit - I didn't realize that there were other cliques here. Currently, I am only in the 'Bendtner was better than Giroud' clique which I am the only member. Hmmmm.....that's not really a clique, is it...



Anyone else want to join?

Herd, I think, will be in that one too. But he's gonna want to turn it into a firm and run about mob handed and splash claret all over the manor you nuttahs!!

clockender1 wrote:

rodders999 wrote: You know the way they say you should never meet your heroes yeah? Well after seeing those leaked photos of Kate Upton and Jennifer Lawrence (2 of my absolute faves) you should also never see the growler of a celebrity you want to shag. I've gone right off em

thats not true about kate uptons muff. its splendid. perfectly smooth, tidy and symmetrical. granted she's a big girl, but some of us can fill that gap

didn't Cat Deeley look rough as old dogs though ? and WHAT was Bar Rafaeli doing with that curling iron and her bottom....

kelly brook has an ugly axe wound. i'm just saying.....

uptons muff hasnt been revealed in any of those leaks...i had to do some research...apparently the stuff was off her bf's phone, and any gash on there isnt hers.

there is apparently one of her back covered in baby batter though!

Yes I saw that one. That could easily be described as a porn load!

Oh the banter

mcdowell42 wrote:Oh the banter

Haven't laughed so much since my nan caught her left tit in the mangle

mcdowell42 wrote:Oh the banter

Time fo the month again?

rodders999 wrote:

mcdowell42 wrote:Oh the banter

Time fo the month again?

Time of the fucking day in McD's case.

DB10GOONER wrote:

Henry Norris 1913 wrote:And did you check with the mods to see if joking about paedophilia is ok? I hear there is a no tolerance attitude? Or are you a member of the infamous gay clique?

And then check if some of our dumber members can see the huge difference between comparing an innocent man to a convicted child molester in a childishly hateful way and light heartedly alluding to something that didn't happen...

Fuck me mate, I apologised. Don't you think it's about time you got over it, notice how I didn't throw my toys out of the pram when you indirectly called me a c@nt. it's called being the bigger man

Anyway if you check the original post you'll realise your mistake. I was comparing him to the lesser known jimmy seville not the jimmy saville you are obviously eluding to, personally I think it's a fucking disgrace that you would even dream of putting the two of them together but hey ho

WE8SPURS wrote:

DB10GOONER wrote:

Henry Norris 1913 wrote:And did you check with the mods to see if joking about paedophilia is ok? I hear there is a no tolerance attitude? Or are you a member of the infamous gay clique?

And then check if some of our dumber members can see the huge difference between comparing an innocent man to a convicted child molester in a childishly hateful way and light heartedly alluding to something that didn't happen...

Fuck me mate, I apologised. Don't you think it's about time you got over it, notice how I didn't throw my toys out of the pram when you indirectly called me a c@nt. it's called being the bigger man

Anyway if you check the original post you'll realise your mistake. I was comparing him to the lesser known jimmy seville not the jimmy saville you are obviously eluding to, personally I think it's a fucking disgrace that you would even dream of putting the two of them together but hey ho

I wasn't actually having a pop at you. I was having a pop at Henry Norris 1913 in reply to his pop at the mods for having a pop at your pop at Wenger.

If it was "indirect", how do you know I was refering to you as a cúnt? But then, as my old Gran always said, "if the cúnt shirt fits..."

And whilst I am flattered by your offer of sex, I will have to turn you down on this occasion. You might redirect your attentions towards Spuddy as he will fuck anything with a pulse and even the odd thing without.

And whilst I am flattered by your offer of sex, I will have to turn you down on this occasion. You might redirect your attentions towards Spuddy as he will fuck anything with a pulse and even the odd thing without.

TBH i don't think Wengers' love child potatoepeeler has forgiven me for my misguided post about his pops, best left to cool down for a while else I fear I may end up with a prolapsed ringer

WE8SPURS wrote: TBH i don't think Wengers' love child potatoepeeler has forgiven me for my misguided post about his pops, best left to cool down for a while else I fear I may end up with a prolapsed ringer

You make such an assumption that your ringer would be targeted

begeegs wrote:

WE8SPURS wrote: TBH i don't think Wengers' love child potatoepeeler has forgiven me for my misguided post about his pops, best left to cool down for a while else I fear I may end up with a prolapsed ringer

You make such an assumption that your ringer would be targeted

the playing mantis wrote:
there is apparently one of her back covered in baby batter though!

one of her chest too.

i have no idea what Rodders is on about - her boobs are glorious perfection imho almost as good as a Gerorge Graham Back 4.

Link?