lethal prodigy
more to the point and much more important -nor does the missus!
THE CHELSKI CONSPIRACY - FINAL THOUGHTS
-
Its Up 4 Grabs Now
- Posts: 4701
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:08 pm
Quick question Roly (a genuine query, not an antagonistic one)... given your absolute confidence that this tournament has been fixed from the get-go by "Mr A" why did you only bet on the Chavs getting to the final and not to win outright?
The odds would have been better & surely given the lengths he would have had to go to in order to fix it thus far Abramovich would have gone the whole hog and fixed the whole thing for Chavski to win!
This may have been covered in the original thread & all but that's about 15 pages long so sod going through all that.
The odds would have been better & surely given the lengths he would have had to go to in order to fix it thus far Abramovich would have gone the whole hog and fixed the whole thing for Chavski to win!
This may have been covered in the original thread & all but that's about 15 pages long so sod going through all that.
Its a easy name really polyrolypoly wrote:
GE etc-can t you give yourself an easier name.
do`t remember seeing any posting by you on my original thread but at least you are being rational in your thought process unlike some others.
however . answer this as nobody else did on main thread. we all now know when wimbledon home game to arsenal called off due to floodlight failure 5 secs into 2ndhalf it was a fix;a betting scam.
that was a live game on tv potentially very important but it happened before millions of eyes.
you would have used the same argument - not possible because etc etc; if i said at time it was a betting scam likes of lethal prodigy would have said i was a fool.
the most successful conspiracies are unbelievable. mr a is a genius despicable but a genius.
who was sitting two rows behind the new russian president at his inaugaration - mr a. mr a is where he is for very reason he has been underestimated. and how many people needed-not many a few uefa officials, a couple of relatively poorly paid refs and maybe a couple of players esp those coming towards end of career -enter past his best scorer of last min own goal.
Ur right i didnt post..i wasnt that active really around the board..
I remember that floodlight failure..i was a young fella who had to go to bed early then cause the match was called early
I guessing all it would take for a flood light failure would be 1 rogue technican to flip a switch or cut a wire and leave..
Thats a easy trick to pull..compared to fixing a popular televised match which involves 22 players,coaches,officials,security...alot more difficult..admittidly not impossible cause nothing is impossible...but i might stress how unlikely i believe it is..
If so..who is ur past of best scorer from chavski??
No real condidate is there on the chavs team..
Stranger things have happened..but i dont think there is a conspiracy to the level u are suggesting here..even if the chavs win it will take alot pf evidence for u to convince me other wise..its slghtly suspicious..nothing more..
UP FOR GRABS
its a good question which was asked before and unconvincingly answered.
as soon as i heard final in moscow, i though tthis was the height of madness for reasons previously explained and must have been the work of mr a and mr a is bound to pull out all the stops to ensure his team get there.
once moanrinho sacked and replacedby grant i was even more convinced cos the appointment of grant made no sense unless it it did not matter who was nominally the manager.
so i have always focused on chelski getting there as has mr a.
you are right the odds would have better on them winning-about 12/1 but i guess in back of mind was thought there are so many bent clubs out there esp italians and the muppets, just maybe they could out corrupt him but not prevent his club getting to final-as you know very conveniently chelski avoided playing such clubs on road to final
anyway as you know mr a not seen in uk for several weeks. there is a theory he had to stay out ofcountry for tax reasons althiough if that is so i am surprised not mentioned in media - my theory is his absence due to working on fixing the final and making sure all his mates would be looked after.
not convincing i know but best i can do and still a bit nervy than muppets so experienced at the corruption game.
hope that sort of answers you
its a good question which was asked before and unconvincingly answered.
as soon as i heard final in moscow, i though tthis was the height of madness for reasons previously explained and must have been the work of mr a and mr a is bound to pull out all the stops to ensure his team get there.
once moanrinho sacked and replacedby grant i was even more convinced cos the appointment of grant made no sense unless it it did not matter who was nominally the manager.
so i have always focused on chelski getting there as has mr a.
you are right the odds would have better on them winning-about 12/1 but i guess in back of mind was thought there are so many bent clubs out there esp italians and the muppets, just maybe they could out corrupt him but not prevent his club getting to final-as you know very conveniently chelski avoided playing such clubs on road to final
anyway as you know mr a not seen in uk for several weeks. there is a theory he had to stay out ofcountry for tax reasons althiough if that is so i am surprised not mentioned in media - my theory is his absence due to working on fixing the final and making sure all his mates would be looked after.
not convincing i know but best i can do and still a bit nervy than muppets so experienced at the corruption game.
hope that sort of answers you
GE etc
"slightly suspicious"
give me another 24 hours and i`ll have you converted!
nice talking to you -at last a sensible response - but got to go now.
no doubt there will be more pearls of wisdom from me in next couple of days.
ideally 2 min before kick off a nuclear bomb will drop on pitch but dont suppose will happen - osama -our fellow gooner-are you listening
bye for now
"slightly suspicious"
give me another 24 hours and i`ll have you converted!
nice talking to you -at last a sensible response - but got to go now.
no doubt there will be more pearls of wisdom from me in next couple of days.
ideally 2 min before kick off a nuclear bomb will drop on pitch but dont suppose will happen - osama -our fellow gooner-are you listening
bye for now
-
Red Gunner
- Posts: 5778
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 6:25 pm
- Location: London
Osama..gooner maybe..huge terrorist master mind...NOTrolypoly wrote:GE etc
"slightly suspicious"
give me another 24 hours and i`ll have you converted!
nice talking to you -at last a sensible response - but got to go now.
no doubt there will be more pearls of wisdom from me in next couple of days.
ideally 2 min before kick off a nuclear bomb will drop on pitch but dont suppose will happen - osama -our fellow gooner-are you listening
bye for now
-
gooner.ed
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3458
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 3:05 pm
- Location: Scotland Yard's 10 Most Wanted List
it's horrible to contemplate either side winning, but i would enjoy it in a way if - due to the decisions made - it was an obvious fix.
in that way there would be no merit in chavski winning it and at the same time, can you imagine ferguson! he'd go even more ballistic than usual! that would make great tv!
so whatever happens, i hope someone feels well and truly robbed.
as for rolypoly's conspiracy theory, i always wanted to believe it, but also, i really can't see why RA would do it if he didn't fix the final as well. he'd look a bit of a mug in front of his pals at the post-match party in whatever nightclub he's booked for it. so if the theory is true, chavski will win.
the one thing that cannot be argued with is RA's spending power regarding persuading people (riise for example) to make things happen. the only thing that confuses me is why he hasn't done it in this tournament before this season. why wait so long?
in that way there would be no merit in chavski winning it and at the same time, can you imagine ferguson! he'd go even more ballistic than usual! that would make great tv!
so whatever happens, i hope someone feels well and truly robbed.
as for rolypoly's conspiracy theory, i always wanted to believe it, but also, i really can't see why RA would do it if he didn't fix the final as well. he'd look a bit of a mug in front of his pals at the post-match party in whatever nightclub he's booked for it. so if the theory is true, chavski will win.
the one thing that cannot be argued with is RA's spending power regarding persuading people (riise for example) to make things happen. the only thing that confuses me is why he hasn't done it in this tournament before this season. why wait so long?
-
Graham Wilkinson
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:42 pm
- Location: North London
Roly,
Good news.
I am not at all upset that you don't care that I don't believe you.
I have enough to worry about without giving too much consideration to you views on my views of your theories.
Incidentally, you may recall that in a previous thread I challenged you to reveal your true name. You refused, I think on the grounds that your life might be at risk from psychotic fellow forum members. Shortly afterwards a third party PMd me with your details.
I have, of course, to date respected your wishes. But if the pressure from fellow members to tell all becomes too intense, I might not be able to bear it and I might weaken. Let's hope that doesn't happen.
Good news.
I am not at all upset that you don't care that I don't believe you.
I have enough to worry about without giving too much consideration to you views on my views of your theories.
Incidentally, you may recall that in a previous thread I challenged you to reveal your true name. You refused, I think on the grounds that your life might be at risk from psychotic fellow forum members. Shortly afterwards a third party PMd me with your details.
I have, of course, to date respected your wishes. But if the pressure from fellow members to tell all becomes too intense, I might not be able to bear it and I might weaken. Let's hope that doesn't happen.
-
QuartzGooner
- Posts: 14474
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 pm
- Location: London
-
flash gunner
- Posts: 29243
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:55 am
- Location: Armchairsville. FACT.
Roly what odds would you give on GW spilling the beans on your infoGraham Wilkinson wrote:Roly,
Good news.
I am not at all upset that you don't care that I don't believe you.
I have enough to worry about without giving too much consideration to you views on my views of your theories.
Incidentally, you may recall that in a previous thread I challenged you to reveal your true name. You refused, I think on the grounds that your life might be at risk from psychotic fellow forum members. Shortly afterwards a third party PMd me with your details.
I have, of course, to date respected your wishes. But if the pressure from fellow members to tell all becomes too intense, I might not be able to bear it and I might weaken. Let's hope that doesn't happen.
