WHAM - this (Last) Christmas

[augie]

Well if scoring two (match winning) goals isn't enough for the critics to admit someone has redeemed themselves from a poor performance, then I think that says more about the critics than the player - be it Giroud or Walcott.

And consistency is all I am advocating - if people stood up for giroud after scoring 2 goals like wally did then I would say fair enough but that would not have happened. Mind you for what it is worth, scoring 2 goals today wouldn't have redeemed giroud in my eyes either

[augie]

Surely Bendtner has done enough to warrant a start up in Newcastle?

You must be jesting

You would hope so wouldn't you

[milesgooner]

Seriously there are a couple of people on here that need to sort themselves out. One in particular takes great delight in anything that the team and individuals do wrong. It just makes them look a bellend when the team turns the game round. Looks like trolling to me - if not I would suggest they don't entrench themselves in such a position they feel they can't be positive when someone they hate puts in a decent performance. As for Giroud, he looks knackered and is not playing particularly well, however that does not make him a donkey, Lee Chapman and least of all a useless c***! We will need him up in Newcastle because his hold up play is a lot better than Bendtner's.

[clockender1]

I think some people are a bit over sensitive re missed chances be it wally or Giroud.

The problem is that we create so few....

It's ironic that once again that an unplanned tactical change forces Wenger to play one of our best. Players in his best position.

Hopefully Caz will get a run in the centre though I'm sure le professor is itching to get jack in their and Caz back out wide.

[dPmunky]

I think some people are a bit over sensitive re missed chances be it wally or Giroud.

The problem is that we create so few....

good point. when we struggle (this year at least) it's in the final 3rd trying to ticky tacky with 13 one touch passed before we shoot.

[milesgooner]

To be fair I would worry if we played Cazorla in the middle from the start against Newcastle. I would play both Arteta and Flamini in the middle with a three ahead of Walcott Wilshere and Cazorla. When the tackles are flying around in the first 20 minutes you need to earn the right to play. Cazorla looked great because he had the space to play in as the pace had dropped a bit.

[augie]

Seriously there are a couple of people on here that need to sort themselves out. One in particular takes great delight in anything that the team and individuals do wrong. It just makes them look a bellend when the team turns the game round. Looks like trolling to me - if not I would suggest they don't entrench themselves in such a position they feel they can't be positive when someone they hate puts in a decent performance. As for Giroud, he looks knackered and is not playing particularly well, however that does not make him a donkey, Lee Chapman and least of all a useless c***! We will need him up in Newcastle because his hold up play is a lot better than Bendtner's.

27 posts on this forum and you feel qualified to label a member as a troll

[Supagoon]

To be fair I would worry if we played Cazorla in the middle from the start against Newcastle. I would play both Arteta and Flamini in the middle with a three ahead of Walcott Wilshere and Cazorla. When the tackles are flying around in the first 20 minutes you need to earn the right to play. Cazorla looked great because he had the space to play in as the pace had dropped a bit.

Id agree that carzola would need some tacklers next to him so he can play just ahead of arteta and flamini

[milesgooner]

[quote="augie"][quote="milesgooner"]Seriously there are a couple of people on here that need to sort themselves out. [color=#FF0000]One in particular takes great delight in anything that the team and individuals do wrong. It just makes them look a bellend when the team turns the game round. Looks like trolling to me[/color] - if not I would suggest they don't entrench themselves in such a position they feel they can't be positive when someone they hate puts in a decent performance. As for Giroud, he looks knackered and is not playing particularly well, however that does not make him a donkey, Lee Chapman and least of all a useless c***! We will need him up in Newcastle because his hold up play is a lot better than Bendtner's.[/quote]



27 posts on this forum and you feel qualified to label a member as a troll [/quote]


I do actually.

Just because I don't post, it doesn't mean I haven't read the forum regularly for the last 7 or 8 years. I don't feel the need to make an arse of myself every 20 minutes on here like some.

Just because you've posted thousands of entries doesn't mean you are more qualified to have an opinion.

That's like saying because I go to more games than you you're views aren't as valid.

[augie]

To be fair I would worry if we played Cazorla in the middle from the start against Newcastle. I would play both Arteta and Flamini in the middle with a three ahead of Walcott Wilshere and Cazorla. When the tackles are flying around in the first 20 minutes you need to earn the right to play. Cazorla looked great because he had the space to play in as the pace had dropped a bit.

Id agree that carzola would need some tacklers next to him so he can play just ahead of arteta and flamini

True but (a) he is wasted on the wing (b) he is not a winger and leaves the team unbalanced when he plays there (c) similar to rosicky, he tries to inject tempo/pace into our play when he gets possession

[falkirk goon]

They are shite...we are shite....game will no doubt be a pile of shite

You see - although I can't explain why, it does work!!

[augie]

Seriously there are a couple of people on here that need to sort themselves out. One in particular takes great delight in anything that the team and individuals do wrong. It just makes them look a bellend when the team turns the game round. Looks like trolling to me - if not I would suggest they don't entrench themselves in such a position they feel they can't be positive when someone they hate puts in a decent performance. As for Giroud, he looks knackered and is not playing particularly well, however that does not make him a donkey, Lee Chapman and least of all a useless c***! We will need him up in Newcastle because his hold up play is a lot better than Bendtner's.

27 posts on this forum and you feel qualified to label a member as a troll

I do actually.

Just because I don't post, it doesn't mean I haven't read the forum regularly for the last 7 or 8 years. I don't feel the need to make an arse of myself every 20 minutes on here like some.

Just because you've posted thousands of entries doesn't mean you are more qualified to have an opinion.

That's like saying because I go to more games than you you're views aren't as valid.

Never said that you aint entitled to an opinion or that you not allowed to express it but I absolutely don't believe that you have earned the right to label someone who has over 15k of posts as being a troll. I have zero problem with you disagreeing with my opinions but do so on the basis that you believe them to be incorrect and not because you see the poster as being a troll for having an opinion that differs from your own

[LDB]

Seriously there are a couple of people on here that need to sort themselves out. One in particular takes great delight in anything that the team and individuals do wrong. It just makes them look a bellend when the team turns the game round. Looks like trolling to me - if not I would suggest they don't entrench themselves in such a position they feel they can't be positive when someone they hate puts in a decent performance. As for Giroud, he looks knackered and is not playing particularly well, however that does not make him a donkey, Lee Chapman and least of all a useless c***! We will need him up in Newcastle because his hold up play is a lot better than Bendtner's.

27 posts on this forum and you feel qualified to label a member as a troll

I do actually.

Just because I don't post, it doesn't mean I haven't read the forum regularly for the last 7 or 8 years. I don't feel the need to make an arse of myself every 20 minutes on here like some.

Just because you've posted thousands of entries doesn't mean you are more qualified to have an opinion.

That's like saying because I go to more games than you you're views aren't as valid.

Never said that you aint entitled to an opinion or that you not allowed to express it but I absolutely don't believe that you have earned the right to label someone who has over 15k of posts as being a troll. I have zero problem with you disagreeing with my opinions but do so on the basis that you believe them to be incorrect and not because you see the poster as being a troll for having an opinion that differs from your own

It is quite interesting that you assume he is talking about you. Or maybe it's only interesting because I'm in the midst of celebratory boxing day drinks

[milesgooner]

[quote="augie"][quote="milesgooner"][quote="augie"][quote="milesgooner"]Seriously there are a couple of people on here that need to sort themselves out. [color=#FF0000]One in particular takes great delight in anything that the team and individuals do wrong. It just makes them look a bellend when the team turns the game round. Looks like trolling to me[/color] - if not I would suggest they don't entrench themselves in such a position they feel they can't be positive when someone they hate puts in a decent performance. As for Giroud, he looks knackered and is not playing particularly well, however that does not make him a donkey, Lee Chapman and least of all a useless c***! We will need him up in Newcastle because his hold up play is a lot better than Bendtner's.[/quote]



27 posts on this forum and you feel qualified to label a member as a troll [/quote]


I do actually.

Just because I don't post, it doesn't mean I haven't read the forum regularly for the last 7 or 8 years. I don't feel the need to make an arse of myself every 20 minutes on here like some.

Just because you've posted thousands of entries doesn't mean you are more qualified to have an opinion.

That's like saying because I go to more games than you you're views aren't as valid.[/quote]


Never said that you aint entitled to an opinion or that you not allowed to express it but I absolutely don't believe that you have earned the right to label someone who has over 15k of posts as being a troll. I have zero problem with you disagreeing with my opinions but do so on the basis that you believe them to be incorrect and not because you see the poster as being a troll for having an opinion that differs from your own[/quote]

I suggest you go back and look at my comments, I didn't specifically call anyone out as a troll. You seem to think I've accused you - which I haven't. Perhaps troll is the wrong word for someone that takes more delight in seeing there own view being proved right even if it is at the expense of the team. Maybe it is not done just to get a reaction our of people (which I believe is the actual definition). From the chats on this timeline there is one person that stands out a mile, and has consistently done so all season.

[SteveO 35]

Seriously there are a couple of people on here that need to sort themselves out. One in particular takes great delight in anything that the team and individuals do wrong. It just makes them look a bellend when the team turns the game round. Looks like trolling to me - if not I would suggest they don't entrench themselves in such a position they feel they can't be positive when someone they hate puts in a decent performance. As for Giroud, he looks knackered and is not playing particularly well, however that does not make him a donkey, Lee Chapman and least of all a useless c***! We will need him up in Newcastle because his hold up play is a lot better than Bendtner's.

27 posts on this forum and you feel qualified to label a member as a troll

I do actually.

Just because I don't post, it doesn't mean I haven't read the forum regularly for the last 7 or 8 years. I don't feel the need to make an arse of myself every 20 minutes on here like some.

Just because you've posted thousands of entries doesn't mean you are more qualified to have an opinion.

That's like saying because I go to more games than you you're views aren't as valid.

Never said that you aint entitled to an opinion or that you not allowed to express it but I absolutely don't believe that you have earned the right to label someone who has over 15k of posts as being a troll. I have zero problem with you disagreeing with my opinions but do so on the basis that you believe them to be incorrect and not because you see the poster as being a troll for having an opinion that differs from your own

I suggest you go back and look at my comments, I didn't specifically call anyone out as a troll. You seem to think I've accused you - which I haven't. Perhaps troll is the wrong word for someone that takes more delight in seeing there own view being proved right even if it is at the expense of the team. Maybe it is not done just to get a reaction our of people (which I believe is the actual definition). From the chats on this timeline there is one person that stands out a mile, and has consistently done so all season.

Oooooh how exciting. It's our very own I'm A Troll.....Get Me Outta Here

Augie.....it might be you.........1989 it's not you.......Falkirk Goon it's not you.........Donaldo it's not you.......Goonersid it's not you.......Northbank123 it's not you.......which means......SteveO it might be you

The person that Miles has voted he most wants out of the Gooner jungle is..............both of you !

ONE ARSENE WENGER.......THERE'S ONLY ONE ARSENE WENGER