I disagree (quelle surprise) as Arseblog said today "They’ll pay him £200,000+ a week by all accounts, and to my mind that makes this move as much about money as if he’d gone to City"Babatunde wrote:Although I hope this 'mercenary' crap will stop now. He's just left a team that's got less trophy success over almost 8 years than Birmingham and Spuds; for the biggest club and best manager in the country. He cares about football though I admit it's a bit effing sour he has joined them of all teams...
Shrek had to make an RVP I'm off 'ambition' statement to get that kind of money out of ManUre
the Glazers have a pocketlining share issue to justify - SirMeatFace was being questioned for his support of them
this has the feeling of an expensive diversion to me
I think Heinze was a reserve team player priced at about 25% of what we'll get RVP for, pretty different ballparkBabatunde wrote:It's sick really. Could you imagine Fergie letting us hav Rooney? Hah! In fact, I am sick of hearing this 'Arsene had no chouce' bollocks. Do you remember the story of Gabriel Heinze? Only had one year left on his contract. Wanted to go to Liverpool. Sulked and tried to force a move. Fergie made it ead clear that he'd rather see Heinze rot in the reserves for a year than join the Mickeys, What happened in the end? Transferred to another country. Simples.
Depens how you express it - could say Fergie is a chequebook manager and Wenger builds teams but yes SirMeatFace has not had the same financial constraints as WengerBabatunde wrote:Like I said though Fergie is a football man and Wenger is a money man.
Babatunde wrote: The club is rotten, they seem to keep pushing it each yearjust to see how far they can take the piss with the fans, and it seems the answer is, they can do what they want.
they haven't pushed us out of the CL - for all the sales I think we could still repeat last season RVP POY through Cazorla and get YPOY with Ox
RVP on paper looks a good deal - injuries, age, wages he wanted, expiring contractBabatunde wrote:RVP. Nasri. Cole. Clichy. Bayor. Kolo.
All sold to club we are allegedly trying to compete against or 'cannot compete' with!!!![]()
![]()
Na$ri IMO flattered to deceive last season - he wasnt key to their championship. He could go on to be a great player that said I wouldn't have given him a big pay rise before his 1/2 a good season.
Cole is world class, was a terrible loss. Once he met Chelski in public it was difficult to see anything but his departure.
Clichy looks good again but was stagnant for us. Logical sale
Greedybarndoor - brilliant deal for us
Kolo - a great player who never recovered post malaria
of those only Cole actually improved a rival IMO (RVP and Na$ri still could - I hope they flop badly)
typical Baba straw man nonsense. Why disagree with real people when you can make up imaginary points of viewBabatunde wrote:Such is the laughable state of te apologetic JCL fanbase we now have that if we sold Wilshere to the Spuds in a year I am sure you'd hear 'oh GREAT BUSINESS' he is 'injury prone' 'unproven' etc...
RVP last season was behind only Messi and Ronaldo (Cavani prob nearby) but historically he's been undeniably injury-prone. Giving a 29 year old a 4 year £200K a week contract, the only way we would have kept him, would have been an enormous gamble. Maybe it could have won us the league - he would have had to do that (or more) to justify us committing £24M on him. If we go out and buy a good backup striker with the money we're not in bad shape. With your virulently anti-Song views surely his likely replacement would be a massive improvement...?Babatunde wrote:RVP was the best striker in Europe just a few months ago and now all of a sudden, he is an injury-prone overhyped piece of garbage? Really?
![]()
PS if we win our first few games try not to disappear Babs