What's next? Someone disagrees with a bill parliament is trying to pass so it gets taken to court and delayed, then appealed a few times no matter the decision and drags out for years and years. Potentially certain types of decision taken by government could end up tied up in years of legal wrangling in the courts causing massive delays, massive legal costs and yet more budget over-runs again and again, as future examples HS2 or Heathrows 3rd runway spring to mind but i bet that there are others, even down to local government trying to build new roads, housing estates basically anything that someone disagrees with that a lawyer can find a loophole on and use this precedence.
Government should never have a completely free hand however i do feel that this is a slippery slope to start down and i definitely don't see this singular case being the last of it now precedence has been set.

I hope i'm wrong but lawyers being lawyers i'm not convinced
