Nor did they when he was stalling signing a contract when his current one had less than a year at the same time as judas'VoiceOfReason wrote:The stats speak for themselves. In ten years at the club, he's scored 53 league goals (an average of 4.8 a season, including this eleventh season).
If this were Chamakh, Gervinho or Bendtner with this stat, they'd be rightly crucified - yet Walcott seems to get away with it, for some reason. How on earth can anyone think he's value for money? He's scored 13 league goals in the past three seasons FFS!
Giving him the armband was a complete joke too. It's not charity to be handed out based on sentimentality, and I can't think of any player in the club's history less of a leader than Walcott. I can't wait for the day this passionless fraud fucks off out of our club.
As my friend rightly pointed out in a text convo, if he were really any good, he'd have been snapped up long ago. Anybody ever notice how no clubs ever come in for him during transfer windows?
WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2015 11:54 am
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
He'd be a much better player if there was no offside rule.
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62205
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
And no football on the pitch. Oh, hang on, that's just running.Tommy_Goon wrote:He'd be a much better player if there was no offside rule.


-
- Posts: 6173
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 7:06 pm
- Location: Cologne
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
His best position would be round Ray C's place.



Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
No club came in for him so we gave him a new contract worth £140k a week.The same as a world class player like Sanchezcasgooner wrote:Nor did they when he was stalling signing a contract when his current one had less than a year at the same time as judas'VoiceOfReason wrote:The stats speak for themselves. In ten years at the club, he's scored 53 league goals (an average of 4.8 a season, including this eleventh season).
If this were Chamakh, Gervinho or Bendtner with this stat, they'd be rightly crucified - yet Walcott seems to get away with it, for some reason. How on earth can anyone think he's value for money? He's scored 13 league goals in the past three seasons FFS!
Giving him the armband was a complete joke too. It's not charity to be handed out based on sentimentality, and I can't think of any player in the club's history less of a leader than Walcott. I can't wait for the day this passionless fraud fucks off out of our club.
As my friend rightly pointed out in a text convo, if he were really any good, he'd have been snapped up long ago. Anybody ever notice how no clubs ever come in for him during transfer windows?


-
- Posts: 18391
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:19 pm
- Location: ireland
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Was just having a look at the afc forum,and someone has actually started a thread in appreciation of Theo's 10 yrs at the club.


- northbank123
- Posts: 12436
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
- Location: Newcastle
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Very salient point that we hardly faced a fight from another club to keep him on our books. He fucking shafted us with no leverage.
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
In the entire decade of his Arsenal career, one successful run albeit full 80 meters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-5j2k6yTyo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-5j2k6yTyo
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62205
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Mental. Do we pull in millions on "Theo" jerseys out in Japan or Malaysia or something?northbank123 wrote:Very salient point that we hardly faced a fight from another club to keep him on our books. He fucking shafted us with no leverage.

- GoonerMuzz
- Posts: 5753
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2014 11:53 pm
- Location: Defending is optional
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Do you think one of the reasons AW keeps players like Theo around, other than them possibly being sycophants, is that if he sold them and they actually produced for another club it would bring his coaching abilities into question
Nah, who am i kidding they'd only be successful at another club because of his years of coaching

Nah, who am i kidding they'd only be successful at another club because of his years of coaching

- StuartL
- Posts: 7878
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 8:22 pm
- Location: It’s a new dawn, a new day a new life, for me and I’m feeling good
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
No, its because there is nobody out there better in the whole of the footballing world - don't you pay attention ?GoonerMuzz wrote:Do you think one of the reasons AW keeps players like Theo around, other than them possibly being sycophants, is that if he sold them and they actually produced for another club it would bring his coaching abilities into question![]()
Nah, who am i kidding they'd only be successful at another club because of his years of coaching
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
I don't mind as long as it's his pay week!arseofacrow wrote:His best position would be round Ray C's place.
![]()


Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Your forgetting he did get a shot on target earlier in the year - & I think the keeper missed it.Blade wrote:In the entire decade of his Arsenal career, one successful run albeit full 80 meters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-5j2k6yTyo


Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
I'm the other way around. I have thought he's been carried for the past few years & have been slagged off by many for my views. Now I don't feel so alone about it. One thing in his defence that I can relate to, having been injured many times as a player also, (centuries ago!), It gets harder every time you come back from injury, especially the tackling /being tackled bit !!. I wish him luck in his athletics career where no one kicks you.QuartzGooner wrote:I am a Walcott fan more than most on here but he has been in a poor run of form since the Man City game.
Physically he looks lacking a bit of sharpness.
I do not go along with the view he avoids getting involved.
I think the return of Ozil and Sanchez will help him get back some form.


-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:07 pm
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Walcott's tragedy is that he has come to personify everything wrong with Emirates era Arsenal. Lots of potential - for which he has been handsomely rewarded, - a marketable personality off the pitch, and very little else. He never tries ANYTHING unusual in games, he doesn't win the ball (see Sanchez for that increasingly rare Arsenal skill) he can't head, he can't use his left foot, he can't take free-kicks, his finishing is at best unpredictable. Etc etc. Even his good goals have had a bizarre element of comedy about them (I'm thinking Chelsea away when he fell over...Villareal at home when he dinked it miles up into the air...Spurs in the 5-2 when he bamboozled a defender because of his miscontrol...) From about 2007-2011 he hid in most games, not showing for Sagna at all and never doing anything defensively (because he's physically unable to.) And yet he's been there 10 years. Mind you, Johann Djorou was once Arsenal's longest serving player, so as usual it all comes down to the manager and his lack of ruthlessness. Same old same old til Wenger leaves, sadly. Walcott personifies the wasted years.