The Gooner Forum

olgitgooner wrote:

fuck me sideways

Over/under number of paragrahs in Marty's reply at 3

Ill go over

Deise Gooner wrote:Over/under number of paragrahs in Marty's reply at 3

Ill go over

Not sure, but I foresee a lot of spelling mistakes.

g88ner wrote:I'm fully aware you're not the only foul mouthed, abusive poster on here - far from it. Not sure why that makes it okay though. You're not a sheep, and you're intelligent enough to know right from wrong - so why stoop to their level?

As a self confessed foul mouthed abusive poster I fucking resent that statement g88ner.

I thought we were friends?

Number 5 wrote:

g88ner wrote:I'm fully aware you're not the only foul mouthed, abusive poster on here - far from it. Not sure why that makes it okay though. You're not a sheep, and you're intelligent enough to know right from wrong - so why stoop to their level?

As a self confessed foul mouthed abusive poster I fucking resent that statement g88ner.

I thought we were friends?

Ah, fuck you *word censored* pussy!

MM99 wrote:

Does anyone remember what this tread was about originally

Deise Gooner wrote:Fair play antgel, great thread you have here

Tell you what, I was getting embarrassed by the course of things but... It just got better in the last couple of pages.

*fwapfwapfwap*

g88ner wrote:Ok, my opinion is worthless to you.

"...given that..." , g88ner, "...given that..." as in at this time in this context and this subject. You and I may disagree but I have plenty time for you and respect for your views whether I agree with them or not on other matters the same way you do me.

g88ner wrote: I'm fully aware you're not the only foul mouthed, abusive poster on here - far from it. Not sure why that makes it okay though. You're not a sheep, and you're intelligent enough to know right from wrong - so why stoop to their level? I guess that's what confuses me. On the one hand, you're posting interesting posts on the state of our football club, and then you're making abusive comments like "c**t pussy", etc. It doesn't fit.

Maybe not... but if you go to a debate moderated on Oxford universoty Debating Society Rules and the other fellow calls you a *word censored* and pulls out a baseball bat at the start you are under know obligation to just be called a *word censored* and get your head smashed while reading your prepared index cards and opening argument.. I will be respectful with those who respect me and will try to be respectful with those who do not. But if they persist I'm not gonna run hide. If they want that fight they'll get it if they won''t offer me an alternative.

g88ner wrote: I suppose that's why I'm more inclined to get exasperated by your behaviour above others who don't engage in thought provoking discussions. I just assume you're too mature to stoop so low.

You're exasperated? Try being me. Go back to page 7 where I first posted here. Not once before that My name was brought up in an argment by MM99 and I asked a question about a comment he made and then when Flash decided to stick his nose in and I asked him not to. That 's it. Read the page or I'll happliy PM you the posts. Now people want me banned for hi-jacking this thread when I never even commented in it before today and someone else brought me up. I didn't hi-jack this thread either - or more accuaretly I simply asked a question and becuase of other people continuing to engage in childish hrarssnebt and my furstration with no one else addressing it this spiralled into this and I dleiberately hi-jacked this thread now.

g88ner wrote: You feel I'm baised, and that's fine. Personally, I'd say that you stand out the most as you do appear to be the constant in these feuds. You're opponent(s) seems to change from week to week (Olgit, mcdowell, Flash, etc) but you remain, day in, day out... week in, week out. I guess that's why you're more likely to stand out. You may disagree, I'm sure.

I think that would be a valid point and in fact have witnessed similar things and cometo similar conclusions. But I would also add that despite sharp differences in our views bar this there has been no feud with us. Despite very sharp differences of opinions with others on here that are well known Quartz and i get on quite well and 1991 and I have put aside a lot of crap from before as well.

The problem here is certain individuals who don't just take it too far but then justify it at every turn. What they do is banter or hunour. If I do it its abuse. What they do is because I did it before even if I did not do it. What they do is all about exopressing their freedom. If I do it its taking the piss out of the forum's freedom.

And fairly or not that's how it comes across from you too. Its like someone has kicked my in the groin while you are watching but when I grab them to give back some pain suddenly its all wrong and all. How would you feel?

g88ner wrote:I still don't think the conduct of others makes any difference though. You're responsible for your behaviour and no one elses. As long as you behave in the right way, that's all you can do. I don't see why that [obvious] concept is so difficult to grasp.

It wouldn't if it were dealt with objectively. I take full responsibility form how I choose to respond to someone. I won't take responsibility for what I am responding to though, or that it my spark a response.

USMartin wrote:

g88ner wrote:Ok, my opinion is worthless to you.

"...given that..." , g88ner, "...given that..." as in at this time in this context and this subject. You and I may disagree but I have plenty time for you and respect for your views whether I agree with them or not on other matters the same way you do me.

g88ner wrote: I'm fully aware you're not the only foul mouthed, abusive poster on here - far from it. Not sure why that makes it okay though. You're not a sheep, and you're intelligent enough to know right from wrong - so why stoop to their level? I guess that's what confuses me. On the one hand, you're posting interesting posts on the state of our football club, and then you're making abusive comments like "c**t pussy", etc. It doesn't fit.

Maybe not... but if you go to a debate moderated on Oxford universoty Debating Society Rules and the other fellow calls you a c**t and pulls out a baseball bat at the start you are under know obligation to just be called a c**t and get your head smashed while reading your prepared index cards and opening argument.. I will be respectful with those who respect me and will try to be respectful with those who do not. But if they persist I'm not gonna run hide. If they want that fight they'll get it if they won''t offer me an alternative.

g88ner wrote: I suppose that's why I'm more inclined to get exasperated by your behaviour above others who don't engage in thought provoking discussions. I just assume you're too mature to stoop so low.

You're exasperated? Try being me. Go back to page 7 where I first posted here. Not once before that My name was brought up in an argment by MM99 and I asked a question about a comment he made and then when Flash decided to stick his nose in and I asked him not to. That 's it. Read the page or I'll happliy PM you the posts. Now people want me banned for hi-jacking this thread when I never even commented in it before today and someone else brought me up. I didn't hi-jack this thread either - or more accuaretly I simply asked a question and becuase of other people continuing to engage in childish hrarssnebt and my furstration with no one else addressing it this spiralled into this and I dleiberately hi-jacked this thread now.

g88ner wrote: You feel I'm baised, and that's fine. Personally, I'd say that you stand out the most as you do appear to be the constant in these feuds. You're opponent(s) seems to change from week to week (Olgit, mcdowell, Flash, etc) but you remain, day in, day out... week in, week out. I guess that's why you're more likely to stand out. You may disagree, I'm sure.

I think that would be a valid point and in fact have witnessed similar things and cometo similar conclusions. But I would also add that despite sharp differences in our views bar this there has been no feud with us. Despite very sharp differences of opinions with others on here that are well known Quartz and i get on quite well and 1991 and I have put aside a lot of crap from before as well.

The problem here is certain individuals who don't just take it too far but then justify it at every turn. What they do is banter or hunour. If I do it its abuse. What they do is because I did it before even if I did not do it. What they do is all about exopressing their freedom. If I do it its taking the piss out of the forum's freedom.

And fairly or not that's how it comes across from you too. Its like someone has kicked my in the groin while you are watching but when I grab them to give back some pain suddenly its all wrong and all. How would you feel?

g88ner wrote:I still don't think the conduct of others makes any difference though. You're responsible for your behaviour and no one elses. As long as you behave in the right way, that's all you can do. I don't see why that [obvious] concept is so difficult to grasp.

It wouldn't if it were dealt with objectively. I take full responsibility form how I choose to respond to someone. I won't take responsibility for what I am responding to though, or that it my spark a response.

Theres a page 7

antgel wrote:

Deise Gooner wrote:Fair play antgel, great thread you have here

Tell you what, I was getting embarrassed by the course of things but... It just got better in the last couple of pages.

*fwapfwapfwap*

Thanks to my good self.

i love lamp.

MM99 wrote:This is quite possibly my favourite thread ever.

Quality posts from Mcdowell, Number 5, g88ner and of course USmartin who you can always rely on to provide gems such as

why you little c**t pussy

and

I did not call you all sorts of c**ts. I called you a c**t and then I called you a bigger c**t then you already (were). That is by my count two sorts of c**ts which is a ways from all sorts of c**ts...

Now here are some tits

Who's this? I would..... :sodomite: