More like this....kingjayson1 wrote:Marty do you look anything llike this?
Fingers skipping across keyboard. Playing same old tune. On the board. geddit?
Serious question
-
olgitgooner
- Posts: 7431
- Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:39 am
- Location: Brexitland
Fingers skipping across keyboard. Playing same old tune. On the board. geddit?
Last edited by olgitgooner on Wed Jun 15, 2011 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Having been on here awhiile and seen and read enough stuff that my facial muscles no longer have the capacity to blush (this is as close as I get nowBabu wrote:I'll have to say I was quite amazed by this new approach.SWLGooner wrote:Jayson's post was the best.
I'm sure Wayno will back me up
I have been following USMartin for quite some time, and that's the first time if I remember correctly that gay porn has been tried.
) nor do my stomach muscles have the capability to turn, so this cannot work at this point
mcdowell42 wrote:Im going to record the date when this evidence sees the light of day so i can say to my grandkids i know where i was the day of the great unveiling when the truth was made known to us by the prophet USMARTY.
Last edited by DUFFMAN on Wed Jun 15, 2011 9:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Henry Norris 1913
- Posts: 8374
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:25 pm
still no replyHenry Norris 1913 wrote:repostingHenry Norris 1913 wrote:you've called everyone in this topic a phony
bullshitter? and the hypocrisy continues. weren't you complaining about the insults you've received by people who don't know what to say to your long posts?
seriously USM I've had enough of you plagueing this forum. Nothing actually wrong with your opinions but your constant abuse is really getting to people . At least other posters that have qualms about the board (Quartz, Duffman, Augie) can post sensibly without reacting like a petulant child. Do you ever wonder why your so disliked here?
and nice to see you've STILL got no evidence . Its looking less hopeful for your case every day Marty...
Henry Norris 1913 wrote:still no replyHenry Norris 1913 wrote:repostingHenry Norris 1913 wrote:you've called everyone in this topic a phony
bullshitter? and the hypocrisy continues. weren't you complaining about the insults you've received by people who don't know what to say to your long posts?
seriously USM I've had enough of you plagueing this forum. Nothing actually wrong with your opinions but your constant abuse is really getting to people . At least other posters that have qualms about the board (Quartz, Duffman, Augie) can post sensibly without reacting like a petulant child. Do you ever wonder why your so disliked here?
and nice to see you've STILL got no evidence . Its looking less hopeful for your case every day Marty...
Henry Norris 1913 wrote:still no replyHenry Norris 1913 wrote:repostingHenry Norris 1913 wrote:you've called everyone in this topic a phony
bullshitter? and the hypocrisy continues. weren't you complaining about the insults you've received by people who don't know what to say to your long posts?
seriously USM I've had enough of you plagueing this forum. Nothing actually wrong with your opinions but your constant abuse is really getting to people . At least other posters that have qualms about the board (Quartz, Duffman, Augie) can post sensibly without reacting like a petulant child. Do you ever wonder why your so disliked here?
and nice to see you've STILL got no evidence . Its looking less hopeful for your case every day Marty...
It's abuse if I say it - nice moral standards and consistency Henry
I won't deny I give as I good as I get - sometimes better (or is it worse in this context) - but for you to single me out as abusive given your comments as well as all the others you read but seem not to see as abusive is beyond hypcritical - its either stupidity or lack of integrity - your choice.
As to the evidence thing...that is coming - although there will still be no evidence in your mind because its already made up - and you say you aren't apathetic. Maybe you're just pathetic because you say you share many of my concerns yet reject and pillory them without failure. I don't know what to beieve you think or represent and that speaks more baout you than it can me.
-
Henry Norris 1913
- Posts: 8374
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:25 pm
pillory them? because you had absolutely no evidence yet had the audacity to say anyone who disregards it is a fool....how can anyone take it seriously otherwiseAs to the evidence thing...that is coming - although there will still be no evidence in your mind because its already made up - and you say you aren't apathetic. Maybe you're just pathetic because you say you share many of my concerns yet reject and pillory them without failure. I don't know what to beieve you think or represent and that speaks more baout you than it can me.
In all fairness martin you were the first to start abusing people , you've got to expect a bit back when you hijacked almost match thread saying things won't change because of the board , if you don't agree your deluding yourselves etc.
No I would say people who discount with out seriousfurther coonsideration are breing foolish because if I am correct and again you agree with amny of my concerns you say, and have not produced any evidence to speak to disprove what I am contending or to prove an alternative theory and explanation in over a year of time to do so.Henry Norris 1913 wrote: pillory them? because you had absolutely no evidence yet had the audacity to say anyone who disregards it is a fool....how can anyone take it seriously otherwise
That doesn't prove my contentions are proven correct but it ssuggests they are genuine enough to merit further serious consideration and concern from all of us than many on this thread want to show or want anyone else to show hence the hi-jacking of it in this manner.
I think that in some cases that may be true, I don't deny I can be tough and give as I good as I get and can give first when it suits me.Henry Norris 1913 wrote: In all fairness martin you were the first to start abusing people , you've got to expect a bit back when you hijacked almost match thread saying things won't change because of the board , if you don't agree your deluding yourselves etc.
On the other hand I think if you actually go back and read all the posts ion this I don't think what you claim above is factually ciorrect or intellectually honest, unless you apply a sliding scale for what defines abuse - in other if someone you agree with or know and like better says its not abuse. By the same token reasonable if strong criticism of another poster comes from a poster you disagree with or don't like than that must be personal abuse.
Can I be abusive? Yes. Can I be abusive first? Yes. Can amore be ore abusive than others toward me? Yes. Does my honesty about that prove your dubious claim? No. And you can prove this or prove yourself I worng. I actually went abck and had a look and so far haven't seen who fired the first shot in anger really. I was a lovely bot then, so nice and cheery, too...
I would say that your account is deeply flawed because as i say you can define and re-definge what is abuse and what is genuine criticsm as it suits you (just as I can) and thus I think your line of reasoning justifying yours and others behavior is frankly dubious and wouldn't stand up to an objective review which I am probably not any better equipped to make here than you. There is a deeper point here for another time, that calls neither you and your conduct nor me and mine into question about what that really means
Last edited by USMartin on Wed Jun 15, 2011 10:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
olgitgooner
- Posts: 7431
- Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:39 am
- Location: Brexitland
-
QuartzGooner
- Posts: 14474
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 pm
- Location: London
[/img]