WALCOTT - which position is best etc?

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
Theoperator
Posts: 2419
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:58 pm
Location: In the tube, rather late again......

Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?

Post by Theoperator »

Q. What exactly is a Walcott

A. A player who plays out of his skin only in the weeks running up to a new contract

falkirk goon
Posts: 4859
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:33 am
Location: In a darkened room

Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?

Post by falkirk goon »

Wage thief

mcdowell42
Posts: 18373
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:19 pm
Location: ireland

Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?

Post by mcdowell42 »

His agent is a genius,140k a week to steal a living,more interested in playing for England .

Rosie_titters
Posts: 5491
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:06 pm
Location: Aberystwyth

Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?

Post by Rosie_titters »

this bloke is really a 20 minute sub as an impact player. When you might need a goal. He can never be allowed to start again.

But again Wenger is to blame. By not buying a World Class striker. Giroud is out of form, Welback has come back from 10 months out and clearly he doesn't trust or rate Campbell.

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?

Post by northbank123 »

He is a fucking useless shit. I know that Quartz has defended him in the past saying that if you go to games you'll see his movement off the ball is actually quite good - well I already disagreed and having stood through that whole saga today it was the most disinterested shower of shit since Adebayor's last few months.

I really cannot put into words how little I think of this fucking greedy little oxygen-thief.

And whilst he might be a legend in his own mind and used to being wanked over, there was not a single person in that away end who didn't cheer when he was substituted, most of them having cursed him all game.

Wilson
Posts: 1025
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:43 am

Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?

Post by Wilson »

In ten seasons, he has only ever scored more than 10 league goals once.

0, 4, 2, 3, 9, 8, 14, 5, 5, 4 (this season).

Thats just S anyway you look at it.

I really think its time Theo is sold. As for a player like Theo, who offers nothing by the way of technical ability or contribution to the teams passing game, he needs to be judged on his goals and assists alone. If he cant score or assist goals, he is offering nothing.

User avatar
TeeCee
Posts: 10012
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:26 pm
Location: On the Cusp in SW France

Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?

Post by TeeCee »

He's average, just like more than half of the Arsenal squad. These players will be indebted to Arsole Wonga forever, and Wonga just loves that adoration.

User avatar
augie
Posts: 30960
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?

Post by augie »

TeeCee wrote:He's average, just like more than half of the Arsenal squad. These players will be indebted to Arsole Wonga forever, and Wonga just loves that adoration.



Which might be acceptable if he wasnt paid like a superstar :roll: The last time his contract was up for renewal, I had some serious arguments on here about the type of money that he was looking for and the type of money he ended up getting - it was (and still is) my belief that you pay a player based on his quality and his importance to the team.....wally is shit and offers fu.ck all to the team but is getting almost the same wage as ozil and sanchez :evil: Some fans tried to say that I shouldnt get hung up on the figures and the days of reasonable and accurate wages were gone, but again I looked at the £140k per week deal and thought that at least 60k of that should be put towards enticing a genuine top quality player to sign for us - of course this brings it all back to the argument that many of us have had that wenker has had money at his disposal but continues to spend it badly :evil: :evil:

casgooner
Posts: 2664
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 7:21 pm
Location: England

Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?

Post by casgooner »

We won't get rid of wally until his contract runs down, he won't go for less than he's on, that's why we had to suffer 'The best striker in the world' for so long. As somebody pointed out, Wenger says he hasn't the money, but he wastes it on paying players who are constantly injured or are just rubbish and on way too much.

casgooner
Posts: 2664
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 7:21 pm
Location: England

Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?

Post by casgooner »

Just making myself miserable reading the newspapers. According to one, Walcott had only 17 touches the whole time he was on the pitch.

Gunner Rob
Posts: 9799
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 3:05 pm

Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?

Post by Gunner Rob »

casgooner wrote:Just making myself miserable reading the newspapers. According to one, Walcott had only 17 touches the whole time he was on the pitch.
£8,000 per touch. :shock:
nice work if you can get it

casgooner
Posts: 2664
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 7:21 pm
Location: England

Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?

Post by casgooner »

Gunner Rob wrote:
casgooner wrote:Just making myself miserable reading the newspapers. According to one, Walcott had only 17 touches the whole time he was on the pitch.
£8,000 per touch. :shock:
nice work if you can get it
And one of those was to set up their first goal!

Tommy_Goon
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2015 11:54 am

Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?

Post by Tommy_Goon »

17 touches is a good amount for Theo in 60 minutes. Didn't he play 30 minutes the other week and touch it 5 times?

User avatar
Nos89
Posts: 4568
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:44 am

Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?

Post by Nos89 »

I wish people would stop picking on him...if he makes the runs and no one passes to him how can he influence the game? There seems to be a culture of picking on the English talent we have at the club. Iwobi has made quite a few substitute appearances and yet to have an assist or goal to his name.

casgooner
Posts: 2664
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 7:21 pm
Location: England

Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?

Post by casgooner »

Nos89 wrote:I wish people would stop picking on him...if he makes the runs and no one passes to him how can he influence the game? There seems to be a culture of picking on the English talent we have at the club. Iwobi has made quite a few substitute appearances and yet to have an assist or goal to his name.
Just a thought, he could try taking the ball with him once in a while...

Post Reply