WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
-
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:58 pm
- Location: In the tube, rather late again......
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Q. What exactly is a Walcott
A. A player who plays out of his skin only in the weeks running up to a new contract
A. A player who plays out of his skin only in the weeks running up to a new contract
-
- Posts: 4859
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:33 am
- Location: In a darkened room
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Wage thief
-
- Posts: 18373
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:19 pm
- Location: ireland
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
His agent is a genius,140k a week to steal a living,more interested in playing for England .
-
- Posts: 5491
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Aberystwyth
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
this bloke is really a 20 minute sub as an impact player. When you might need a goal. He can never be allowed to start again.
But again Wenger is to blame. By not buying a World Class striker. Giroud is out of form, Welback has come back from 10 months out and clearly he doesn't trust or rate Campbell.
But again Wenger is to blame. By not buying a World Class striker. Giroud is out of form, Welback has come back from 10 months out and clearly he doesn't trust or rate Campbell.
- northbank123
- Posts: 12436
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
- Location: Newcastle
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
He is a fucking useless shit. I know that Quartz has defended him in the past saying that if you go to games you'll see his movement off the ball is actually quite good - well I already disagreed and having stood through that whole saga today it was the most disinterested shower of shit since Adebayor's last few months.
I really cannot put into words how little I think of this fucking greedy little oxygen-thief.
And whilst he might be a legend in his own mind and used to being wanked over, there was not a single person in that away end who didn't cheer when he was substituted, most of them having cursed him all game.
I really cannot put into words how little I think of this fucking greedy little oxygen-thief.
And whilst he might be a legend in his own mind and used to being wanked over, there was not a single person in that away end who didn't cheer when he was substituted, most of them having cursed him all game.
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
In ten seasons, he has only ever scored more than 10 league goals once.
0, 4, 2, 3, 9, 8, 14, 5, 5, 4 (this season).
Thats just S anyway you look at it.
I really think its time Theo is sold. As for a player like Theo, who offers nothing by the way of technical ability or contribution to the teams passing game, he needs to be judged on his goals and assists alone. If he cant score or assist goals, he is offering nothing.
0, 4, 2, 3, 9, 8, 14, 5, 5, 4 (this season).
Thats just S anyway you look at it.
I really think its time Theo is sold. As for a player like Theo, who offers nothing by the way of technical ability or contribution to the teams passing game, he needs to be judged on his goals and assists alone. If he cant score or assist goals, he is offering nothing.
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
He's average, just like more than half of the Arsenal squad. These players will be indebted to Arsole Wonga forever, and Wonga just loves that adoration.
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
TeeCee wrote:He's average, just like more than half of the Arsenal squad. These players will be indebted to Arsole Wonga forever, and Wonga just loves that adoration.
Which might be acceptable if he wasnt paid like a superstar




Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
We won't get rid of wally until his contract runs down, he won't go for less than he's on, that's why we had to suffer 'The best striker in the world' for so long. As somebody pointed out, Wenger says he hasn't the money, but he wastes it on paying players who are constantly injured or are just rubbish and on way too much.
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Just making myself miserable reading the newspapers. According to one, Walcott had only 17 touches the whole time he was on the pitch.
-
- Posts: 9799
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 3:05 pm
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
£8,000 per touch.casgooner wrote:Just making myself miserable reading the newspapers. According to one, Walcott had only 17 touches the whole time he was on the pitch.

nice work if you can get it
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
And one of those was to set up their first goal!Gunner Rob wrote:£8,000 per touch.casgooner wrote:Just making myself miserable reading the newspapers. According to one, Walcott had only 17 touches the whole time he was on the pitch.![]()
nice work if you can get it
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2015 11:54 am
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
17 touches is a good amount for Theo in 60 minutes. Didn't he play 30 minutes the other week and touch it 5 times?
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
I wish people would stop picking on him...if he makes the runs and no one passes to him how can he influence the game? There seems to be a culture of picking on the English talent we have at the club. Iwobi has made quite a few substitute appearances and yet to have an assist or goal to his name.
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Just a thought, he could try taking the ball with him once in a while...Nos89 wrote:I wish people would stop picking on him...if he makes the runs and no one passes to him how can he influence the game? There seems to be a culture of picking on the English talent we have at the club. Iwobi has made quite a few substitute appearances and yet to have an assist or goal to his name.