You're right. Unfortunately this was also the turning point to the 'Boring Boring Arsenal' of 1991-95 that GG's entire reign is tarred with.Offside wrote:And when Arsenal were horribly exposed by Benfica in the European Cup ("naive", you might saySean wrote:There's no question that George was just as much of a dictator as TOF, but he wouldn't have tolerated any of the shit that TOF does. He always tried to win the league and when he didn't, he'd usually win us a trophy, despite the poor football in his later seasons. He also built and coached the back five from scratch (and did TOF a massive fucking favour in the process).
The only Arsenal manager to win the Cup Winners Cup and the League Cup), George realised that he needed a new tactical blueprint to win in Europe (strong defence, packed midfield, lone striker, counter-attacks and setpieces), not unlike the method used by Chelsea in 2012. So basically it took George one failed season to work out what was needed to win a European trophy. Wenger hasn't learned what it takes in EIGHTEEN seasons.
![]()
Still, we won more trophies

True enoughDB10GOONER wrote:To be fair - he was! 1992-93.

We also won a cup double that year - Finishing 10th means fuck all; none of that VT shite in those days

Great points made hereWilson wrote:To a degree it is, but the players need to be mostly responsible for in game management. Look at Chelsea, they almost won the CL with Avram Grant, and won it with Di Matteo. That was the Cech-Terry-Cole-Lampard-Drogba spine, and they managed themselves, they knew how to win, and didnt need guidance from the manager, evident by the fact they were managed by novice caretaker managers
So in game management is something the players are primarily responsible for. Although it should start off the pitch with the manager facilitating it. Jose was responsible for much of Chelsea's success even after he was gone, because he built and established the Chelsea machine.
Wengers passive attitude with he captaincy (is Theo really going to be the captain next season - WTF!!!). Wenger's passive attitude on the touchline as you noted, and his soft approach overall, really does not facilitate a culture of responsibility.
Naivety is something you lose when you grow up. Do our players grow under Wenger in terms of mentality? Sure he can teach them to play a crisp passing style, but given our team is naive, whats Wenger doing to iron out the naivety?
You cant blame youth, as our team isnt that young anymore.

Exactly. It's pointless for TOF to even turn up on matchdays, he does fuck all of usexisstential wrote:The only time Wenger gets off his arse is to berate the 4th official for something one of our players has done wrong. He is completely irrelevant, would we play worse if he wasn't there?? I doubt it.

Spot on. When we were successful, the players ran the dressing room themselves.BFG4 wrote:When I look at Wenger's more successful years, not only did he posses quality players, but hugely intelligent players who knew how to adapt their game, depending on how it was going. Having leaders like PV4 on the pitch made a huge difference to our chances of success. One of the problems with having players like Ramsey or Giroud is they play without having the intelligence to adapt their play depending on how the game is going. Also, having a coward like BFG as captain and pretending he is a leader, is like having Giroud and pretending he is a world class striker.
There were one or two occasions during the Invincibles season when a player gave the team-talk to turn things around - Further proof that The Old Fraud is useless.
Now it's the blind leading the blind; a bunch of wimps and idiots making the same stupid mistakes season after season
