Do you realise how stupid your post is ? You have no idea what you are talking about.digger wrote:To be fair, that looks fucking painful. But either hit the deck with a head injury, or man up and play on. He did neitherVince wrote:
Koscielny...
-
LDB
- Posts: 6663
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:13 pm
- Location: Having a cup of tea and waiting for all this to blow over
Why are people blaming koscielny for that? It was squillaci's fault for charging in to head a ball that koscielny clearly had covered.
Maybe he should have gone down and im no doctor, but maybe he wasn't thinking too clearly what with concussion and all?
Maybe he should have gone down and im no doctor, but maybe he wasn't thinking too clearly what with concussion and all?
Last edited by LDB on Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I watched the goals late last night and I have one serious question to ask.....how the fcuk is kos getting the blame for their goal ?? Basic principles of football has always been that the man who is facing the ball takes control and kos did that and won the fcuking header so what more can he do ?? The other dithering *word censored* was running back towards his own goal, had no place going for the header and even if he did head it he wouldnt have had a fcuking clue where it would have gone 
By all means blame kos for goals like the blackburn goal but ffs try and analyse a situation properly before trying to attach blame to the same old names
Basic principles of football has always been that the man who is facing the ball takes control and kos did that and won the fcuking header so what more can he do ?? The other dithering *word censored* was running back towards his own goal, had no place going for the header and even if he did head it he wouldnt have had a fcuking clue where it would have gone By all means blame kos for goals like the blackburn goal but ffs try and analyse a situation properly before trying to attach blame to the same old names
looked to me like he tried to play on, presumably cos the ball was in a dangerous area and he didn't want to let the team down by hitting the deck while they're still attacking (if the ref doesn't stop the game, and who's to say he will just because technically he should). he had a second to make that decision, after being twatted in the face!
i don't get the hate for him, stepanovs and cygan are very fresh in my memory and he's certainly not as bad as either of them, unlike either of them he's very good on the ball, as well as being better than them defensively. the problem kos has got, is that he hasn't got vieira, gilberto or even flamini in front of him helping him.
i wouldn't start him ahead of djourou, but as a 3rd choice he's not that bad
i don't get the hate for him, stepanovs and cygan are very fresh in my memory and he's certainly not as bad as either of them, unlike either of them he's very good on the ball, as well as being better than them defensively. the problem kos has got, is that he hasn't got vieira, gilberto or even flamini in front of him helping him.
i wouldn't start him ahead of djourou, but as a 3rd choice he's not that bad
V.Good.nexum5me wrote:looked to me like he tried to play on, presumably cos the ball was in a dangerous area and he didn't want to let the team down by hitting the deck while they're still attacking (if the ref doesn't stop the game, and who's to say he will just because technically he should). he had a second to make that decision, after being twatted in the face!
i don't get the hate for him, stepanovs and cygan are very fresh in my memory and he's certainly not as bad as either of them, unlike either of them he's very good on the ball, as well as being better than them defensively. the problem kos has got, is that he hasn't got vieira, gilberto or even flamini in front of him helping him.
i wouldn't start him ahead of djourou, but as a 3rd choice he's not that bad
-
Arsenal 1991
- Posts: 3219
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:53 pm
- Location: England
Exactly, Song was anonymous yesterday so they were just waltzing through the middle. Kos and Squillaci aren't a good partnership though, Djourou & Squillaci or Kos & Djourou.nexum5me wrote:looked to me like he tried to play on, presumably cos the ball was in a dangerous area and he didn't want to let the team down by hitting the deck while they're still attacking (if the ref doesn't stop the game, and who's to say he will just because technically he should). he had a second to make that decision, after being twatted in the face!
i don't get the hate for him, stepanovs and cygan are very fresh in my memory and he's certainly not as bad as either of them, unlike either of them he's very good on the ball, as well as being better than them defensively. the problem kos has got, is that he hasn't got vieira, gilberto or even flamini in front of him helping him.
i wouldn't start him ahead of djourou, but as a 3rd choice he's not that bad
Agree with this. . I think some of criticism that Koscielny recieved in past few weeks should have been aimed at Squilachi. I think his purchase was a big mistake.augie wrote:I have to say that right now my choices for the centre back partnership would be kos and djouru cos I think that squilachi is absolute shitWhat exactly is it that squillachi brings to the team then ?
-
Bring Back Pires
- Posts: 2977
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 3:23 pm
I think the problem is that we're already comparing him to the likes of Stepanovs and Cygan, despite having paid £10m for him just four months ago. Surely that can't bode well?nexum5me wrote: i don't get the hate for him, stepanovs and cygan are very fresh in my memory and he's certainly not as bad as either of them
-
Arsenal 1991
- Posts: 3219
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:53 pm
- Location: England
I agree with you guysskipper wrote:Agree with this. . I think some of criticism that Koscielny recieved in past few weeks should have been aimed at Squilachi. I think his purchase was a big mistake.augie wrote:I have to say that right now my choices for the centre back partnership would be kos and djouru cos I think that squilachi is absolute shit
-
mikeyb772001
- Posts: 4569
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:03 pm
- Location: Block 6! Drunk and standing next to a mad man with no clothes on!
-
LDB
- Posts: 6663
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:13 pm
- Location: Having a cup of tea and waiting for all this to blow over
Disagree, while gallas was a better defender then these two on his day he was also imo highly responsible for a lot of the points we dropped away to lesser teams in the past few years. I'd rather defenders that are imperfect and perhaps still adapting then a *word censored* who picks & chooses when he wants to show up.mikeyb772001 wrote:Both of them are avaerage. Even though Billy was a c**t, we down graded.
Waste of money both the new CB's
-
Arsenal 1991
- Posts: 3219
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:53 pm
- Location: England
and nasri hates him.LDB wrote:Disagree, while gallas was a better defender then these two on his day he was also imo highly responsible for a lot of the points we dropped away to lesser teams in the past few years. I'd rather defenders that are imperfect and perhaps still adapting then a c**t who picks & chooses when he wants to show up.mikeyb772001 wrote:Both of them are avaerage. Even though Billy was a c**t, we down graded.
Waste of money both the new CB's
-
thearsenal
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 5:46 pm
