EVERTON AWAY THREAD

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
LDB
Posts: 6663
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:13 pm
Location: Having a cup of tea and waiting for all this to blow over

Post by LDB »

augie wrote:Big Big 3pts but -

1. Imo song was pure shite (sorry rebs). His tackling is still shit, his passing was embarrassing and he was destroyed in the air time and time again (not least for their goal).

2. Squillachi is not good enough. He is hesitant, nowhere near dominant in the air and is as slow as a cart horse :roll:

3. We made the last 15-20mins far harder than it should have been. We were in total control and looked threatening every time we attacked but of course we decided to be smartarses and do keep ball instead as we played sidewards and backwards followed swiftly by handing possession back to them via bad passing :roll: :banghead: Sometimes these cocks get above themselves :x

5. Substitutions were woeful. Tbf I thought denilson did very well but I also thought taking off arshavin was a bad move but the eboue for chamakh decision was absolutely ridiculous and baffling :? We basically decided to bring in the cheating c**t and surrender possession for them to launch balls into our area :roll:
Other then that, good game eh? :lol:

Its Up 4 Grabs Now
Posts: 4701
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:08 pm

Post by Its Up 4 Grabs Now »

g88ner wrote:Get in! 8) great result!!!!

SHOCKING decision to take Chamakh off with 2 minutes left though - and for Eboue???? :? - how the fuck does that help?? Eboue's passing is erratic at the best of times, but coming into a fast paced game with no time to adjust was asking a lot, and Nasri isn't a target man... he isn't going to win a header against the defence, and Chamakh's aerial ability was useful when defending corners, too!

Odd, I thought - and put more pressure on us, with any punt forward bound to come straight back at us.

Still, we won - and deservedly so. Get in!!!! :barscarf:
Odd, but hardly surprising. It was the classic Wenger “how ze furck do I protect a lead?â€

kg1794
Posts: 887
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:20 am
Location: N4

Post by kg1794 »

augie wrote:Big Big 3pts but -

1. Imo song was pure shite (sorry rebs). His tackling is still shit, his passing was embarrassing and he was destroyed in the air time and time again (not least for their goal).

2. Squillachi is not good enough. He is hesitant, nowhere near dominant in the air and is as slow as a cart horse :roll:

3. We made the last 15-20mins far harder than it should have been. We were in total control and looked threatening every time we attacked but of course we decided to be smartarses and do keep ball instead as we played sidewards and backwards followed swiftly by handing possession back to them via bad passing :roll: :banghead: Sometimes these cocks get above themselves :x

5. Substitutions were woeful. Tbf I thought denilson did very well but I also thought taking off arshavin was a bad move but the eboue for chamakh decision was absolutely ridiculous and baffling :? We basically decided to bring in the cheating c**t and surrender possession for them to launch balls into our area :roll:
you can't count :lol:

User avatar
augie
Posts: 30997
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by augie »

LDB wrote:
augie wrote:Big Big 3pts but -

1. Imo song was pure shite (sorry rebs). His tackling is still shit, his passing was embarrassing and he was destroyed in the air time and time again (not least for their goal).

2. Squillachi is not good enough. He is hesitant, nowhere near dominant in the air and is as slow as a cart horse :roll:

3. We made the last 15-20mins far harder than it should have been. We were in total control and looked threatening every time we attacked but of course we decided to be smartarses and do keep ball instead as we played sidewards and backwards followed swiftly by handing possession back to them via bad passing :roll: :banghead: Sometimes these cocks get above themselves :x

5. Substitutions were woeful. Tbf I thought denilson did very well but I also thought taking off arshavin was a bad move but the eboue for chamakh decision was absolutely ridiculous and baffling :? We basically decided to bring in the cheating c**t and surrender possession for them to launch balls into our area :roll:
Other then that, good game eh? :lol:

We did play well and as I said it was a great win especially when those theiving scouse *word censored* tried to bully the ref into giving them decisions :evil: However we dont half make things harder than they need to be at times though

User avatar
augie
Posts: 30997
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by augie »

kg1794 wrote:
augie wrote:Big Big 3pts but -

1. Imo song was pure shite (sorry rebs). His tackling is still shit, his passing was embarrassing and he was destroyed in the air time and time again (not least for their goal).

2. Squillachi is not good enough. He is hesitant, nowhere near dominant in the air and is as slow as a cart horse :roll:

3. We made the last 15-20mins far harder than it should have been. We were in total control and looked threatening every time we attacked but of course we decided to be smartarses and do keep ball instead as we played sidewards and backwards followed swiftly by handing possession back to them via bad passing :roll: :banghead: Sometimes these cocks get above themselves :x

5. Substitutions were woeful. Tbf I thought denilson did very well but I also thought taking off arshavin was a bad move but the eboue for chamakh decision was absolutely ridiculous and baffling :? We basically decided to bring in the cheating c**t and surrender possession for them to launch balls into our area :roll:
you can't count :lol:

:oops: :oops: :oops: :banghead:

tel
Posts: 817
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:56 pm
Location: Earth

Post by tel »

No grumbles from me for once as it's good to see us grind out wins when not at our best. Sometimes the manager and the team deserve criticism, today isn't one of them.

User avatar
g88ner
Posts: 14693
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:17 pm

Post by g88ner »

augie wrote:I also thought taking off arshavin was a bad move
Hmmm.... couldn't disagree more.

I thought Arshavin wanted to come off. He looked like he'd run out of energy, and wasn't keeping up with play.

Taking him off was, in my opinion, the only option - personally, I thought replacing him with Theo's pace would have helped at that point, but Rosicky does work very hard.

User avatar
Eboue-Why?
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Sunny Surrey

Post by Eboue-Why? »

g88ner wrote:
augie wrote:I also thought taking off arshavin was a bad move
Hmmm.... couldn't disagree more.

I thought Arshavin wanted to come off. He looked like he'd run out of energy, and wasn't keeping up with play.

Taking him off was, in my opinion, the only option - personally, I thought replacing him with Theo's pace would have helped at that point, but Rosicky does work very hard.
Even a blind man could see that we needed an outlet rather than Eboue on for Chamakh at the end. Shocking substitution. Song is desperate for another red card. Silly foul after silly foul etc
Great 4 days, 6 points at 2 difficult away grounds but this club will give me a heart attack one day and I promise I will sue their arses off!!!

User avatar
nexum5me
Posts: 1541
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 8:25 pm
Location: chi

Post by nexum5me »

not that i'm complaining about the win, but it makes the losses to wba and newcastle even more annoying!

wlchuccc
Posts: 1211
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:02 pm

Post by wlchuccc »

g88ner wrote:
augie wrote:I also thought taking off arshavin was a bad move
Hmmm.... couldn't disagree more.

I thought Arshavin wanted to come off. He looked like he'd run out of energy, and wasn't keeping up with play.

Taking him off was, in my opinion, the only option - personally, I thought replacing him with Theo's pace would have helped at that point, but Rosicky does work very hard.
Agreed with g88ner, basically nothing for the second half from Arshavin. He didn't do much defensive work anyway, why he used up his energy that quick :roll:

User avatar
Big_G
Posts: 1834
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:26 pm
Location: Southend, Essex

Post by Big_G »

augie wrote:2. Squillachi is not good enough. He is hesitant, nowhere near dominant in the air and is as slow as a cart horse :roll:
what do you mean..?

Image

looks confident and assured to me... :lol: :lol: 8)

Its Up 4 Grabs Now
Posts: 4701
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:08 pm

Post by Its Up 4 Grabs Now »

g88ner wrote:
augie wrote:I also thought taking off arshavin was a bad move
Hmmm.... couldn't disagree more.

I thought Arshavin wanted to come off. He looked like he'd run out of energy, and wasn't keeping up with play.

Taking him off was, in my opinion, the only option - personally, I thought replacing him with Theo's pace would have helped at that point, but Rosicky does work very hard.
Agree with that. I’ve always found augie’s unconditional defence of Arshavin almost SteveO35/Diaby-esque in it’s tenderness. :shock: :wink:

User avatar
g88ner
Posts: 14693
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:17 pm

Post by g88ner »

eliogooner wrote:
1989 wrote:Look who's on - DENILSON :banghead:
Jack off.
:shock: :shock:

That's a bit harsh, 1989 - in fact, maybe you should jack off, you wanker! :x :roll: :wink:

M-50
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:27 am

Post by M-50 »

Samir Nasri :bowing21: (not for the 1st time this season)

Great performance all round. A few hiccups along the way but nothing's perfect.

Brilliant result and I'm f*cking delighted :barscarf:

Come on the mackems!

User avatar
HashKads
Posts: 5267
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:44 pm
Location: Maiden name: KingJayson

Post by HashKads »

On our way home now. 4 long hours! Big 3 points but made hard work of the last 20 mins.

Post Reply