Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:16 pm
Ive asked this before and i'll ask again How old are you '91?Arsenal 1991 wrote:It seems that as people understand us more, we seem to be getting much less abuse.
The Gooner's Online Message Board
https://forum.onlinegooner.com/
Ive asked this before and i'll ask again How old are you '91?Arsenal 1991 wrote:It seems that as people understand us more, we seem to be getting much less abuse.
Don't let it bother you. We are still a minority. It's nothing like the abuse you'll get at home matches if you dare to raise a dissenting voiceArsenal 1991 wrote:It seems that as people understand us more, we seem to be getting much less abuse.
Twenty years young.flash gunner wrote:Ive asked this before and i'll ask again How old are you '91?Arsenal 1991 wrote:It seems that as people understand us more, we seem to be getting much less abuse.
No probs mate just some comments make you seem younger than 20Arsenal 1991 wrote:Twenty years young.flash gunner wrote:Ive asked this before and i'll ask again How old are you '91?Arsenal 1991 wrote:It seems that as people understand us more, we seem to be getting much less abuse.![]()
Not concerned at all, think its very positive. The Black Scarvers got so much abuse.SteveO 35 wrote:Don't let it bother you. We are still a minority. It's nothing like the abuse you'll get at home matches if you dare to raise a dissenting voiceArsenal 1991 wrote:It seems that as people understand us more, we seem to be getting much less abuse.
Perhaps because I used to be.flash gunner wrote:No probs mate just some comments seem youre younger than 20Arsenal 1991 wrote:Twenty years young.flash gunner wrote:Ive asked this before and i'll ask again How old are you '91?Arsenal 1991 wrote:It seems that as people understand us more, we seem to be getting much less abuse.![]()
![]()
I think it comes down to clarity over your aims, which is I wanted 2-3 simple and precise statements. Most people have read them and think they can see some common sense in what we're asking. I don't think the Black Scarf guys deserved lots of stick, but I'm not entirely sure what they wanted either....Arsenal 1991 wrote:Not concerned at all, think its very positive. The Black Scarvers got so much abuse.SteveO 35 wrote:Don't let it bother you. We are still a minority. It's nothing like the abuse you'll get at home matches if you dare to raise a dissenting voiceArsenal 1991 wrote:It seems that as people understand us more, we seem to be getting much less abuse.
I think you and Quartz did a great job with that. I think we're nearly there with our aims just think the 1st needs rewriting and the second needs tweaking. I'll have a go, just so you know what I mean.SteveO 35 wrote:I think it comes down to clarity over your aims, which is I wanted 2-3 simple and precise statements. Most people have read them and think they can see some common sense in what we're asking. I don't think the Black Scarf guys deserved lots of stick, but I'm not entirely sure what they wanted either....Arsenal 1991 wrote:Not concerned at all, think its very positive. The Black Scarvers got so much abuse.SteveO 35 wrote:Don't let it bother you. We are still a minority. It's nothing like the abuse you'll get at home matches if you dare to raise a dissenting voiceArsenal 1991 wrote:It seems that as people understand us more, we seem to be getting much less abuse.
Not really - this is right Mr. Hill-Wood's wheelhouse really and is no different than calling George Graham on the carpet in 1991 after the brawl at Old Trafford.storrmin571 wrote:I'm beginning to think there is separation in the club if the press are to be believed hill-wood apparently criticised wenger for his outburst after Barca and have replacement managers lined up.
Please, please, please read a little of this thread before you comment on the movement.highburyJD wrote:you can all see that there isn't a team in the world that works to this transparent fantasy model though...?
I miss the 'good old days' to some extent (isn't that what this is basically about? if it's about the early noughties it's pure brattishness)
and I would sign up to a campaign for total financial transparency in football (would be more important to the Leeds/Pompeys of this world than us)
+ also on an old days tack for safe standing and limitations on ticket price gouging
but we're 2nd "sack the manager" sounds embarrassingly childish.
I think Redknapps a decent manager *spit* but up the road he's built/got a substantially more expensive squad (bentley, modric, palacios, pavlyuchenko and defoe would each be our record signing ffs)
and I don't think they will make the CL. He has expensive 'proven players in every position
if they do the substantially more expensive Citeh won't
its a tough league
oh by the way ManUre are in a strong position, everyone hear thinks they will win the league.
If they throw it away should Fergie be sacked?
In fact if Redknapp wins nothing should he be sacked?
If he gets in the CL + no trophies he'll be lauded as a genius.
It would also be enough to keep Mancini his job despite his insane spend.
and yes I am comparing us to historically inferior clubs - because they have spent money yet failed, it shows money is no guarantee.
I'm not saying 'wenger knows' as in he is always automatically right, I want us to ship out several players
but this idea that spending money is an automatic solution is demonstrably false (I dont even think Wenger is good at spending big money)
a revolution is on the horizonArsenal 1991 wrote:We've 43 followers on twitter and 78 fans on facebook so far.
Well we haven't exactly done anything to promote it yet have we!Henry Norris 1913 wrote:a revolution is on the horizonArsenal 1991 wrote:We've 43 followers on twitter and 78 fans on facebook so far.![]()
![]()
when we get the flyers going you can tell it will be front page newsArsenal 1991 wrote:Well we haven't exactly done anything to promote it yet have we!Henry Norris 1913 wrote:a revolution is on the horizonArsenal 1991 wrote:We've 43 followers on twitter and 78 fans on facebook so far.![]()
![]()