Koscielny...

selsdon · Post by **selsdon** » Sun Dec 05, 2010 5:02 pm

Read somewhere Wenger doesn't like his players calling for the ball as it gives away their position to the oppo.

The word stark raving bonkers springs to mind.

LDB · Post by **LDB** » Sun Dec 05, 2010 5:04 pm

selsdon wrote:Read somewhere Wenger doesn't like his players calling for the ball as it gives away their position to the oppo.

The word stark raving bonkers springs to mind.

A blog by any chance?

Arsenal 1991 · Post by **Arsenal 1991** » Sun Dec 05, 2010 5:10 pm

LDB wrote:
selsdon wrote:Read somewhere Wenger doesn't like his players calling for the ball as it gives away their position to the oppo.

The word stark raving bonkers springs to mind.
A blog by any chance?

selsdon · Post by **selsdon** » Sun Dec 05, 2010 5:13 pm

Think it was The Daily Star but can't be certain.

bigreddave · Post by **bigreddave** » Sun Dec 05, 2010 5:26 pm

In my opinion both kos and squilaci are a waste of money so hopefully wenger will shore us up in defence in january to give these two some much needed competition. As for the fulham goal no way was kos at fault, he got clattered but should have gone straight down and maybe the ref would have blown up straight away for a head injury.

Percy Dalton · Post by **Percy Dalton** » Sun Dec 05, 2010 5:43 pm

selsdon wrote:Think it was The Daily Star but can't be certain.

The Beano for adults!

LDB · Post by **LDB** » Sun Dec 05, 2010 5:45 pm

Percy Dalton wrote:
selsdon wrote:Think it was The Daily Star but can't be certain.

The Beano for adults!

... The Beano isnt for adults?

selsdon · Post by **selsdon** » Sun Dec 05, 2010 5:52 pm

Arsenal 1991 · Post by **Arsenal 1991** » Sun Dec 05, 2010 5:55 pm

Percy Dalton wrote:
selsdon wrote:Think it was The Daily Star but can't be certain.

The Beano for adults!

whats the sun then?

Percy Dalton · Post by **Percy Dalton** » Sun Dec 05, 2010 5:57 pm

selsdon wrote:

To be fair Selsdon, admitting that The Daily Star was your point of reference was never going to help your case.

selsdon · Post by **selsdon** » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:03 pm

What's wrong with The Star?

Oh i can't be bothered - tumbleweed was meant to represent 'whoosh' as in over ur head as in sarcasm as in irony as in self-deprecating etc etc

Percy Dalton · Post by **Percy Dalton** » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:04 pm

selsdon wrote:What's wrong with The Star?

Nothing at all if your only reason for holding it is to keep your chips warm!

Jesus, it is the worst rag out there!

selsdon · Post by **selsdon** » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:06 pm

quality pics tho

i was taking the piss m8

anyway enough frivolities for the day, off out to try and drink this cold out of my system - see y'all in three weeks time for the next batch of Kos excuses

Henry Norris 1913 · Post by **Henry Norris 1913** » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:06 pm

Percy Dalton wrote:
selsdon wrote:What's wrong with The Star?

Nothing at all if your only reason for holding it is to keep your chips warm!

Jesus, it is the worst rag out there!

liverpool fans believe otherwise

MutleyGooner · Post by **MutleyGooner** » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:48 pm

Henry Norris 1913 wrote:
Percy Dalton wrote:
selsdon wrote:What's wrong with The Star?

Nothing at all if your only reason for holding it is to keep your chips warm!

Jesus, it is the worst rag out there!

liverpool fans believe otherwise

Oi you at the back, stop pushing