Re: EU referendum - What will you vote?
Posted: Sun May 29, 2016 4:45 pm
At least Cameron had the balls to have a referendum unlike his Labour counterpart over the Lisbon treaty. this referendum should have been done then.
The Gooner's Online Message Board
https://forum.onlinegooner.com/
Great about the petrol, but it took a year of forelock tugging and hat doffing no doubt. As per expenses, tell me about the EU bosses now.Chippy wrote:By all means vote leave, but at least do so for valid reasons or a purely emotional response, not because of a bunch of lies or half truths made up by the gutter press.casgooner wrote:My random thoughts on the Brexit debate:-
Where to begin?
Queen is a nominal figurehead and doesn't make any decisions.
If you believe that you'll believe anything
We do elect MEPs but they don't get to vote on or pass any laws, they do as they are told and just rubber stamp them.
WTF? No law can be passed in the EU without going through the parliament. Where do you get this from?
If you think our Government is corrupt, look at the heads of the EU. They don't have their finances checked by anyone, they don't have to account for anyone when they bill their expenses claim.
https://fullfact.org/europe/did-auditor ... eu-budget/A group of 34 peers meanwhile claimed a total of £130,000 despite never voting, and eight claimed £29,000 but neither spoke or voted.
https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/go ... rs-2014-15
The President of Europe wasn't elected, when will that position become fully active without anyone voting for the post holder?
He was elected by the parliament. In the same way the British PM is effectively elected by parliament
We can't do anything that will help our own citizens. Cameron wanted to reduce fuel tax for drivers in the Highlands,
and was told he couldn’t the tax has to be the same everywhere!
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/rura ... reen-light
We wanted to not tax Tampons, yes Tampons, but we were told we couldn't as everywhere else in Europe taxed Tampons, so tax stays.
I'll give you that one
We can't have anything revised or planned unless 28 other countries agree it.
Not true. On most issues there is qualified majority voting, where big countries like the UK get slightly more than their fair share of votes. Only big issues like letting in a new country require unanimity. The UK has been on the winning side in 88% of votes in the Council of Ministers.
Countries which have very different needs to ours.
Europe is too big and bureaucratic and it will only get worse.
I'm voting leave!!!!
Nail on head!casgooner wrote:At least Cameron had the balls to have a referendum unlike his Labour counterpart over the Lisbon treaty. this referendum should have been done then.
The tory party is going to tear itself apart no matter which way the vote goes. The referendum was the plaster to hold together the two wings, once it is out of the way it will be bedlam. Add on top the chances they might lose a raft of seats...OneBardGooner wrote:It looks like this could also be the end of Cameron - if we do leave - Lot's of Tory toadies coming out of the shadows to stick the boot in.
Oh what fun.
Nos89 wrote:It's recently occurred to me that by leaving the EU we pass on all the powers to our own state, this government to write the bill of rights, human rights bill and set trade deals for our agricultural and industrial businesses.
Voting out won't change the government we currently have, unless an emergency election is called, and I can't see that happening. So, Cameron and Osbourne can set the agenda to their liking. So, anyone think things will be better overnight is very much mistaken.
With our totally undemocratic electoral system it is very possible.northbank123 wrote:Definitely bad news for the Tory party whatever happens.
That said is it possible to lose a general election to Jeremy Corbyn?
What do you consider to be a democratic system? It certainly is an anomally that UKIP had a million more votes than the SDP yet one got one seat, the other got 50 but it is based on one man one vote and first past the post in every constituency. PR hasn't worked in any other European country that's tried it unless you want the chaos that is Italy so what is the alternative?Chippy wrote:With our totally undemocratic electoral system it is very possible.northbank123 wrote:Definitely bad news for the Tory party whatever happens.
That said is it possible to lose a general election to Jeremy Corbyn?
PR is used in one form or another in almost every country In Europe, including Scotland, Wales and both bits of Ireland, so not sure why think Italy is the only one.Red Snapper wrote:What do you consider to be a democratic system?Chippy wrote:With our totally undemocratic electoral system it is very possible.northbank123 wrote:Definitely bad news for the Tory party whatever happens.
That said is it possible to lose a general election to Jeremy Corbyn?
One that doesn't give parliamentary majority to a party that gets slightly more than 1/3 of the votes.
It certainly is an anomally that UKIP had a million more votes than the SDP yet one got one seat,
the other got 50 (I assume you mean SNP)
but it is based on one man one vote and first past the post in every constituency. PR hasn't worked in any other European country that's tried it unless you want the chaos that is Italy so what is the alternative?
Chippy you've got to look at the political history of various countries. Most European countries can function perfectly well with a coalition government because their political system is used to it and everybody accepts that an element of collaboration will be inevitable if they ever want power. Those countries are probably constitutionally better set up for coalition governments.Chippy wrote:PR is used in one form or another in almost every country In Europe, including Scotland, Wales and both bits of Ireland, so not sure why think Italy is the only one.Red Snapper wrote:What do you consider to be a democratic system?Chippy wrote:With our totally undemocratic electoral system it is very possible.northbank123 wrote:Definitely bad news for the Tory party whatever happens.
That said is it possible to lose a general election to Jeremy Corbyn?
One that doesn't give parliamentary majority to a party that gets slightly more than 1/3 of the votes.
It certainly is an anomally that UKIP had a million more votes than the SDP yet one got one seat,
the other got 50 (I assume you mean SNP)
but it is based on one man one vote and first past the post in every constituency. PR hasn't worked in any other European country that's tried it unless you want the chaos that is Italy so what is the alternative?