

Radford149 wrote:According to radford we have what is known as a show pony.
the lad lacks the nous to play the game, he has nothing about him that even justifies 20% of the hype.
at best he's an impact player with at best 15 minutes to go. he constantly loses the the ball, makes the wrong pass, mis-controls the ball, fails to deliver a decent cross or beat a man.
his improvement since his arrival has been minimal and his Radford cannot see him replacing anyone in the team as he is simply not good enough.
and as for his loyalty to Arsenal the pup has stated his most important objective this season is getting to the world cup (thanks theo).
Radford also notes that a lot say he will come good, this he may well do but let's be honest here what we have had does not amount to much.
Absolutely correct. Not sure I've come across such an over hyped Arsenal player for many a year. One of the least intelligent players too - if the chance is there to cut inside you can guarantee he'll go for the outside (normally running it out of play in the process), and when the chance is there to go for the line he'll run straight into the full back. Can't cross a ball, too easily knocked around, injury prone. The list goes on - Diaby gets slated for being inconsistent and erratic, where as boy wonder Theo gets away with murder in this respectRadford149 wrote:According to radford we have what is known as a show pony.
the lad lacks the nous to play the game, he has nothing about him that even justifies 20% of the hype.
at best he's an impact player with at best 15 minutes to go. he constantly loses the the ball, makes the wrong pass, mis-controls the ball, fails to deliver a decent cross or beat a man.
his improvement since his arrival has been minimal and his Radford cannot see him replacing anyone in the team as he is simply not good enough.
and as for his loyalty to Arsenal the pup has stated his most important objective this season is getting to the world cup (thanks theo).
Radford also notes that a lot say he will come good, this he may well do but let's be honest here what we have had does not amount to much.
Martin Hayes wrote:Sorry, but some of the comments here read like a tabloid newpaper:
5 years - Bought in January 2006, at the age of 17. Didn't make his debut until the following season. That's less than four years.
Interviews? Unlike some footballers, he is bright and articulate, so he is in demand. I can't recall reading anything which implied that he had a massive ego.
Searing pace? Yes, but he's not the football 'savant' that some claim him to be. He can shoot and cross.
Why do we feel the need to find a scapegoat, and over-analyse the chosen player to death? He has been impressive at times, and should be given time.
We do come across as spoilt brats on occassion...
Why is his reputation even an issue?augie wrote:Anyway this isnt a case of looking for scapegoats but many of us feel that he is certainly being given more leeway cos he is english and that he has a lot to do to justify his rep
g88ner wrote:
I cannot understand why people expect, or demand so much from the boy, just because he's been branded a superkid.
He's been hit by so many injuries that it's difficult to accurately judge the lad.
Beckham was on loan at League 1 side Preston NE at 20, so lets not go overboard, eh. As for Drogba and Ribery, well those superstars were playing for the mighty Le Mans and Stade Brestois, respectively. My point is, 20 is no age at all. Most young players are still very much in development (just like Song, Denilson, Bendtner, etc) and of course, not everyone develops as fast as Cesc, Rooney, and Messi. Those lot are freaks.Rob wrote:He's not a boy is he !!! He's 20 and by that age most footballers who are any good have shown it.
Not as often as I would have liked to, but on a number of occassionsHow many occasions have you seen examples of this quality crossing that you speak of ?
Yes.As for his finishing.....did you watch the league game v the chavs at the grove last season ?
Ooh...as many as Sunderland, Stapleton, Nicholas, Henry, Wiltord, and numerous others have missed on numerous occassions over the years.How many very good chances did he get before they even scored ?
...not that he has many opportunities down the middle...I am always amazed by claims that he is a natural striker cos imo his finishing prowess has never backed that statement up for me
Well plenty, but what that has to do with this, I'm not sure. He speaks well, and yes, being English does make him attractive to the press, rightly or wrongly.As for your interviews response can you tell me how many interviews better Arsenal players than he have given ?
'Continually' being a huge generalisation...The intelligence that you refer to doesnt apply on the pitch cos he continually runs down blind alleys and into full backs
From the responses here, the responses from my Arsenal supporting friends, and general comments at the ground, I'd say that it is a minority.Anyway this isnt a case of looking for scapegoats but many of us feel that he is certainly being given more leeway cos he is english and that he has a lot to do to justify his rep