It's all a load of Cannonballs in here! This is the virtual Arsenal pub where you can chat about anything except football. Be warned though, like any pub, the content may not always be suitable for everyone.
SWLGooner wrote:Martin: a simpler way of saying all that is:
SCOUSERS ARE WHINING c**ts WHO CAN'T ACCEPT BLAME FOR THEIR ACTIONS.
Simpler certainly but I could give a toss how this impacts Liverpool.
My worry is how it could impact Arsenal if the Board aren't absolutely careful about who they sell to. Augie talks about Mr. Kroenke's long-term commitment to Arsenal, but just what is the commitment now that he is focused on buying full control of another American sports franchise. A spokesmn of his even said direcntly though we don't Mr. Kroenke's actual inentions that if he still sought to takeover Arsenal he had sufficient credit to do so. In other words a debt-leveraged takeover is a possibility at this time.
Even Quartz, for all our differences, is deeply concerned about this prospect and that speaks volumes there as to whether we all should be concerned about this happening at Arsenal, who ever the takeover pary or parties may be.
SWLGooner wrote:Martin: a simpler way of saying all that is:
SCOUSERS ARE WHINING c**ts WHO CAN'T ACCEPT BLAME FOR THEIR ACTIONS.
Simpler certainly but I could give a toss how this impacts Liverpool.
My worry is how it could impact Arsenal if the Board aren't absolutely careful about who they sell to. Augie talks about Mr. Kroenke's long-term commitment to Arsenal, but just what is the commitment now that he is focused on buying full control of another American sports franchise. A spokesmn of his even said direcntly though we don't Mr. Kroenke's actual inentions that if he still sought to takeover Arsenal he had sufficient credit to do so. In other words a debt-leveraged takeover is a possibility at this time.
Even Quartz, for all our differences, is deeply concerned about this prospect and that speaks volumes there as to whether we all should be concerned about this happening at Arsenal, who ever the takeover pary or parties may be.
Why don't we just keep the current Board. Better the devil you know. I would rather be in our position than that of Liverpool or United. United are not letting their team grow old cos Fergie is cracking up, his hands are tied financially.
SWLGooner wrote:Martin: a simpler way of saying all that is:
SCOUSERS ARE WHINING c**ts WHO CAN'T ACCEPT BLAME FOR THEIR ACTIONS.
Simpler certainly but I could give a toss how this impacts Liverpool.
My worry is how it could impact Arsenal if the Board aren't absolutely careful about who they sell to. Augie talks about Mr. Kroenke's long-term commitment to Arsenal, but just what is the commitment now that he is focused on buying full control of another American sports franchise. A spokesmn of his even said direcntly though we don't Mr. Kroenke's actual inentions that if he still sought to takeover Arsenal he had sufficient credit to do so. In other words a debt-leveraged takeover is a possibility at this time.
Even Quartz, for all our differences, is deeply concerned about this prospect and that speaks volumes there as to whether we all should be concerned about this happening at Arsenal, who ever the takeover pary or parties may be.
ok, being serious, your point was interesting and thought provoking the first time. You've posted over 2200 messages, averaging over 14 per day and the majority of them have said the exact same thing. mate, it's boring!
DEBT LEVERAGE BAD - FIZMAN BAD - KRONKE BAD - UZMANOV BAD - HILL-WOOD SENILE - QUARTZ WRONG - POWER TO THE PEOPLE!! - FORZA ST. PAULI!!
copy that and put it in your signature and give us all a break
BOJDE LFC wrote:They're doing a sterling job I believe.
If you need any help with problems with the board or how to organise a petition we have the right man for the job on here.He is very clear and concise with his posts he doesnt annoy or bore anyone.And he wont go on and go on and go on and go on and go on and go on etc.Im sure he would love to give you his insights and theories on whats wrong in the boardroom.Its riveting stuff
SWLGooner wrote:Martin: a simpler way of saying all that is:
SCOUSERS ARE WHINING c**ts WHO CAN'T ACCEPT BLAME FOR THEIR ACTIONS.
Simpler certainly but I could give a toss how this impacts Liverpool.
My worry is how it could impact Arsenal if the Board aren't absolutely careful about who they sell to. Augie talks about Mr. Kroenke's long-term commitment to Arsenal, but just what is the commitment now that he is focused on buying full control of another American sports franchise. A spokesmn of his even said direcntly though we don't Mr. Kroenke's actual inentions that if he still sought to takeover Arsenal he had sufficient credit to do so. In other words a debt-leveraged takeover is a possibility at this time.
Even Quartz, for all our differences, is deeply concerned about this prospect and that speaks volumes there as to whether we all should be concerned about this happening at Arsenal, who ever the takeover pary or parties may be.
ok, being serious, your point was interesting and thought provoking the first time. You've posted over 2200 messages, averaging over 14 per day and the majority of them have said the exact same thing. mate, it's boring!
DEBT LEVERAGE BAD - FIZMAN BAD - KRONKE BAD - UZMANOV BAD - HILL-WOOD SENILE - QUARTZ WRONG - POWER TO THE PEOPLE!! - FORZA ST. PAULI!!
copy that and put it in your signature and give us all a break
Apparent ly neither interesting or thought-provoking enough for you to do anything though, eh? Which is solely your choice mate, don't try and put it down to anyone or anything else. It simply doesn't concern you enough. Easier to call the manager a *word censored* twat it is for you and leave it at that. Whrehther the names are justified or not is irrelevent because well it's easier to do.
You mean about how great our Board is and how it only acts in our best interests and never, ever in its own interests? Not that we actaully have a right to know or anything , right ?
SWLGooner wrote:Martin: a simpler way of saying all that is:
SCOUSERS ARE WHINING c**ts WHO CAN'T ACCEPT BLAME FOR THEIR ACTIONS.
Simpler certainly but I could give a toss how this impacts Liverpool.
My worry is how it could impact Arsenal if the Board aren't absolutely careful about who they sell to. Augie talks about Mr. Kroenke's long-term commitment to Arsenal, but just what is the commitment now that he is focused on buying full control of another American sports franchise. A spokesmn of his even said direcntly though we don't Mr. Kroenke's actual inentions that if he still sought to takeover Arsenal he had sufficient credit to do so. In other words a debt-leveraged takeover is a possibility at this time.
Even Quartz, for all our differences, is deeply concerned about this prospect and that speaks volumes there as to whether we all should be concerned about this happening at Arsenal, who ever the takeover pary or parties may be.
ok, being serious, your point was interesting and thought provoking the first time. You've posted over 2200 messages, averaging over 14 per day and the majority of them have said the exact same thing. mate, it's boring!
DEBT LEVERAGE BAD - FIZMAN BAD - KRONKE BAD - UZMANOV BAD - HILL-WOOD SENILE - QUARTZ WRONG - POWER TO THE PEOPLE!! - FORZA ST. PAULI!!
copy that and put it in your signature and give us all a break
USMartin wrote:You mean about how great our Board is and how it only acts in our best interests and never, ever in its own interests? Not that we have a right to know or anything , right ?
I simply dont care! And if I tell I do, chapter 12 of the corporate governance manual will be thrown at my face which I am not interested in reading. Have a good day!
USMartin wrote:You mean about how great our Board is and how it only acts in our best interests and never, ever in its own interests? Not that we actaully have a right to know or anything , right ?
USMartin wrote:You mean about how great our Board is and how it only acts in our best interests and never, ever in its own interests? Not that we have a right to know or anything , right ?
I simply dont care! !
I fixed this for you. Must be something to be proud of then.
USMartin wrote:You mean about how great our Board is and how it only acts in our best interests and never, ever in its own interests? Not that we actaully have a right to know or anything , right ?
STOP HIJACKING EVERY THREAD ON HERE FFS
Excuse me but I am neither the first second or third person to refer to our Board in this thread, or to myself even. Seems to me this thread was hijacked from its original point before I logged on here even
Not that I'd expect to acknowedge that or anything.
Judguing everything about me based on double standards all the way is really first-class, mate.
SWLGooner wrote:Martin: a simpler way of saying all that is:
SCOUSERS ARE WHINING c**ts WHO CAN'T ACCEPT BLAME FOR THEIR ACTIONS.
Simpler certainly but I could give a toss how this impacts Liverpool.
My worry is how it could impact Arsenal if the Board aren't absolutely careful about who they sell to. Augie talks about Mr. Kroenke's long-term commitment to Arsenal, but just what is the commitment now that he is focused on buying full control of another American sports franchise. A spokesmn of his even said direcntly though we don't Mr. Kroenke's actual inentions that if he still sought to takeover Arsenal he had sufficient credit to do so. In other words a debt-leveraged takeover is a possibility at this time.
Even Quartz, for all our differences, is deeply concerned about this prospect and that speaks volumes there as to whether we all should be concerned about this happening at Arsenal, who ever the takeover pary or parties may be.
ok, being serious, your point was interesting and thought provoking the first time. You've posted over 2200 messages, averaging over 14 per day and the majority of them have said the exact same thing. mate, it's boring!
DEBT LEVERAGE BAD - FIZMAN BAD - KRONKE BAD - UZMANOV BAD - HILL-WOOD SENILE - QUARTZ WRONG - POWER TO THE PEOPLE!! - FORZA ST. PAULI!!
copy that and put it in your signature and give us all a break
Apparent ly neither interesting or thought-provoking enough for you to do anything though, eh? Which is solely your choice mate, don't try and put it down to anyone or anything else. It simply doesn't concern you enough. Easier to call the manager a c**t twat it is for you and leave it at that. Whrehther the names are justified or not is irrelevent because well it's easier to do.
how on earth can you possibly hope to gauge what i did and did not take from your original point about the board?! for what it's worth, arsenal shares worth money and keep going up, rich people (as Kronke and Uzmanov clearly are) buy shares... now im no expert but i thought that such practice was known as investment? you know, buy high, sell higher? it has no relevance to me, i'm not a shareholder. situations in manchester and victimpool are correctly as attractive as BrazilianGOONER's pit hair, but so long as the current situation is maintained, i have no issue with it whatsoever. is it coincidence that the 2 largest shareholders have both stopped short of the magic 29.9(?)%?
stick your petitions and preaching up your arse mate, if you want to have a say on how the club is run, get a fanshare or even better, buy a proper share which would give you a say on how things are run. then you can preach all you want and petition as many fellow investors as you like.
if you started posting in appropriate threads with appropriate material, rather than appropriating threads and filling them with your repetitive dirge, you will find that people on here will be far less dismissive of your opinions and maybe even your signature thesis-length replies. please, just give it a rest.
