How many more threads ?

USMartin · Post by **USMartin** » Sat Apr 23, 2011 7:34 pm

mcdowell42 wrote:www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLpfbcXTeo8

....but why are you pissed about it then?

TeeCee · Post by **TeeCee** » Sat Apr 23, 2011 7:35 pm

You cannot answer a question you cannot quantify

And yet your CONSTANT argument is for someone to prove things would be different under a new manager!!!

You have just fucked yourself royally Martin. Well done, you've shafted your OWN argument!

USMartin · Post by **USMartin** » Sat Apr 23, 2011 7:42 pm

NO you cannot assign a monetary value for sale for something that in fact is not sale on its own. You do not just hire a manager solely for the purpose of employing tactcis or motivating players, though certainly those are important parts of the job, but until someone shows me what a club actually pays for either of thiose alone their isn't even a market against which to judge that.

Feel free to go clean that mess off now, spunk smells kinda nasty. Especially when prematurely ejaculated TeeCee, as you have clearly done here. But maybe you just aren't smart enough to understand my point, so you have an excuse - maybe.

TeeCee · Post by **TeeCee** » Sat Apr 23, 2011 7:48 pm

I've won!!! 4000+ posts from him and he's fucked his own argument!!

Peeman · Post by **Peeman** » Sat Apr 23, 2011 7:51 pm

USMartin wrote:NO you cannot assign a value for sale for something that in fact is not sale. You do not just hire a manager solely for the purpose of employing tactcis or motivating players, though certainly those are important parts of the job, but until someone shows me what a club actually pays for either of thiose alone their isn't even a market against which to judge that.

Tactics and motivating players cost zero - it is included in the salary that you pay ur manager, that is what he is paid to do.

So as far as no tactics and no motivation are concerned u can't blame that on board.

I know ur position on the board and indeed nearly everything u say is indeed true but how u can blame the bottle jobbing and lack of effort, heart, motivation, tactics, desire, hunger, pride on anyone but the manager of the decade is beyond me.

USMartin · Post by **USMartin** » Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:01 pm

Peeman wrote:
USMartin wrote:NO you cannot assign a value for sale for something that in fact is not sale. You do not just hire a manager solely for the purpose of employing tactcis or motivating players, though certainly those are important parts of the job, but until someone shows me what a club actually pays for either of thiose alone their isn't even a market against which to judge that.
Tactics and motivating players cost zero - it is included in the salary that you pay ur manager, that is what he is paid to do.

So as far as no tactics and no motivation are concerned u can't blame that on board.

I know ur position on the board and indeed nearly everything u say is indeed true but how u can blame the bottle jobbing and lack of effort, heart, motivation, tactics, desire, hunger, pride on anyone but the manager of the decade is beyond me.

Actually you can to an extent. Not fully but there can be little argument that if insufficient funds are available it can dictate the pool of talent you build your team from and thius the tactics you employ with it.

As for the list of motivational factors again everyone is overpaid relative to therir recent performance improving the manager and when you add that to being under no pressure to produce any better than they are by the people paying them those wages that can be extremely de-motivating.

And again the fact that that is part of what a manger is paid for still does not allow us to assign a monetary value to it until managerial contracts are broken down into amounts for those things.. Mr Wenger gets between 4-5 million a year I believe right now You tell me how much of that he is paid for tactis and motivation as opposed to say minimizing transfer spending and maximizing transfer profit margins. I believe the latter uis what he is paid for more, but I couldn't tell you an actual number.

USMartin · Post by **USMartin** » Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:02 pm

Go clean your pants TeeCee - it's fine if you have no shame but have a little regard for those who have to smell that garbage.

TeeCee · Post by **TeeCee** » Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:06 pm

4000 up and you fucked it up.....4000 up and you fucked it up.....

Peeman · Post by **Peeman** » Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:07 pm

USMartin wrote:
Peeman wrote:
USMartin wrote:NO you cannot assign a value for sale for something that in fact is not sale. You do not just hire a manager solely for the purpose of employing tactcis or motivating players, though certainly those are important parts of the job, but until someone shows me what a club actually pays for either of thiose alone their isn't even a market against which to judge that.
Tactics and motivating players cost zero - it is included in the salary that you pay ur manager, that is what he is paid to do.

So as far as no tactics and no motivation are concerned u can't blame that on board.

I know ur position on the board and indeed nearly everything u say is indeed true but how u can blame the bottle jobbing and lack of effort, heart, motivation, tactics, desire, hunger, pride on anyone but the manager of the decade is beyond me.
Actually you can to an extent. Not fully but there can be little argument that if insufficient funds are available it can dictate the pool of talent you build your team from and thius the tactics you employ with it.

As for the list of motivational factors again everyone is overpaid relative to therir recent performance improving the manager and when you add that to being under no pressure to produce any better than they are by the people paying them those wages that can be extremely de-motivating.

And again the fact that that is part of what a manger is paid for still does not allow us to assign a monetary value to it until managerial contracts are broken down into amounts for those things.. Mr Wenger gets between 4-5 million a year I believe right now You tell me how much of that he is paid for tactis and motivation as opposed to say minimizing transfer spending and maximizing transfer profit margins. I believe the latter uis what he is paid for more, but I couldn't tell you an actual number.

I agree more money should have been spent - I get it.

But even with the squad we have there now and consider the silly points thrown away this season - u know the games i'm not goin to list em - we should have the league in the bag, with a bit of motivation and tactical nouse.

USMartin · Post by **USMartin** » Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:14 pm

TeeCee wrote:I've won!!! 4000+ posts from him and he's fucked his own argument!!

Yes you have won the who is the biggest *word censored* argument although really you had that won long before the first post

mcdowell42 · Post by **mcdowell42** » Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:16 pm

The best thing we can all do now is just log off the forum guys he is going to be on here all night with more endless drivel which will have no beginning or end as he goes round and round in his head.

He will post a question and he will spend the whole night talking to himself and answering his own questions.Really think the asylum you are in should consider taking your keyboard off you and smacking you around the head with it.

USMartin · Post by **USMartin** » Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:19 pm

Peeman wrote: I agree more money should have been spent - I get it.

But even with the squad we have there now and consider the silly points thrown away this season - u know the games i'm not goin to list em - we should have the league in the bag, with a bit of motivation and tactical nouse.

I'm afraid I don't quite agree. I'm not dismissing your argument given how shite Chelsea and united are this year, but I think that underestimates just how lacking this squad really is. It's not 2-3 players its more like 5-6 players short and that's only if you can get a grimandi type and Wiltord type who can be effective in more than one position to replace a couple of the weak links on our bench that are forced to play too regularly to let us win.

USMartin · Post by **USMartin** » Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:20 pm

mcdowell42 wrote:The best thing we can all do now is just log off the forum guys he is going to be on here all night with more endless drivel which will have no beginning or end as he goes round and round in his head.

He will post a question and he will spend the whole night talking to himself and answering his own questions.Really think the asylum you are in should consider taking your keyboard off you and smacking you around the head with it.

And I thought you didn't care anymore - phony hypocritical tosser.

mcdowell42 · Post by **mcdowell42** » Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:20 pm

USMartin wrote:
Peeman wrote: I agree more money should have been spent - I get it.

But even with the squad we have there now and consider the silly points thrown away this season - u know the games i'm not goin to list em - we should have the league in the bag, with a bit of motivation and tactical nouse.
I'm afraid I don't quite agree. I'm not dismissing your argument given how shite Chelsea and united are this year, but I think that underestimates just how lacking this squad really is. It's not 2-3 players its more like 5-6 players short and that's only if you can get a grimandi type and Wiltord type who can be effective in more than one position to replace a couple of the weak links on our bench that are forced to play too regularly to let us win.

Theres a SURPRISE

mcdowell42 · Post by **mcdowell42** » Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:25 pm

USMartin wrote:
mcdowell42 wrote:The best thing we can all do now is just log off the forum guys he is going to be on here all night with more endless drivel which will have no beginning or end as he goes round and round in his head.

He will post a question and he will spend the whole night talking to himself and answering his own questions.Really think the asylum you are in should consider taking your keyboard off you and smacking you around the head with it.
And I thought you didn't care anymore - phony hypocritical tosser.

Is that the best you can do.You are such a sad lonely man and i could nearly be sure you are alone because how could any person be want to be in the same room as you.Cyberspace is the only place you can find some kind of contact to the outside world.So sad

How many more threads ?

....

....

Re: ....