Page 3 of 3
Re: Sammys inconsistent moderating
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 8:15 pm
by armchair
Is the fcukin thread open or not?
Or are the mods abusing their positions again - opening threads to post, then closing again, then opening again.

Re: Sammys inconsistent moderating
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 8:17 pm
by Henry Norris 1913
wordcensoredybollocks

Re: Sammys inconsistent moderating
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 8:20 pm
by SammyDroppedHisShorts
armchair supporter wrote:Is the fcukin thread open or not?
Or are the mods abusing their positions again - opening threads to post, then closing again, then opening again.

No it's open......for now
Re: Sammys inconsistent moderating
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 8:24 pm
by armchair
So ......
this thread has been closed by Reb. Opened by DB10 just so
HE could post, closed again by DB10, then opened again by Sammy?
FFS lads sort it out.
BTW Sammy I did think I had sent you a PM about this before posting on the main forum. But it looks like I didn't give the PM a title and it didn't send. For this I owe you an apology. Sorry.
As for this thread - theres plenty of examples on this thread of similair language that went un-edited by you before and after my post. I could find more but I cant be bovvered. Like I said inconsistent. I didn't say it was personal.
Re: Sammys inconsistent moderating
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 8:27 pm
by SammyDroppedHisShorts
Armchair
I have always found your posting interesting and humorous.
I accept your apology and I do hope you understand just a little bit why I did give you your first war wound. No hard feelings were intended.
With this I sentence this thread to its proper end and will close it once and for all.
Apologies on my part for making you feel victimised.
Re: Sammys inconsistent moderating
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 7:31 am
by DB10GOONER
armchair supporter wrote:So ......
this thread has been closed by Reb. Opened by DB10 just so
HE could post, closed again by DB10, then opened again by Sammy?
FFS lads sort it out.
BTW Sammy I did think I had sent you a PM about this before posting on the main forum. But it looks like I didn't give the PM a title and it didn't send. For this I owe you an apology. Sorry.
As for this thread - theres plenty of examples on this thread of similair language that went un-edited by you before and after my post. I could find more but I cant be bovvered. Like I said inconsistent. I didn't say it was personal.
Again, get the facts first. I didn't re-open the thread and then close it. We don't need to re-open closed threads to post on them. I wasn't asking you a question and wasn't looking for a response so there was no need to re-open it. I was simply stating the facts.