Page 3 of 4
Re: Paedos in the establishment thread.
Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 6:59 pm
by Top Londoner
QuartzGooner wrote:Chippy
The allegations are across all political parties.
Some people have been convicted such as Saville and Stuart Hall etc, but of those listed online not all have even been tried in court.
The British press are nosey so and so's. This is an occasion when they should put their investigative and snooping prowess to good use and uncover evidence, but pass it on to the police rather than publish it all and prejudice a trial before it gets under way.
If the police can be trusted of course?
I am against "Trial by bloggers" though.
As for people being dead, they may still have families who are living.
Just because someone is rich/famous/in politics etc does not mean there has to be extra clamour to pursue them, this sort of thing is done by people in all walks of life and with all types of bank balance.
I am all for investigations and legal action if required, that is of value, but only limited value, if the current scandals are not used as impetus to find out why this abuse is done, and how to prevent it.
Quartz.
Savile was not convicted.
Hall is not a convicted paedophile.
The police are complicit, and have covered up countless paedophile rings.
These child sex rings goes to the very top.
I agree that this happens in all walks of life. Social workers, clergy, bankers, lawyers......royalty too?
The media know much more than they can print, but they're choosing the lesser names to write about for a reason. Think about it.
The whole truth will never out.
Re: Paedos in the establishment thread.
Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2015 7:06 am
by LeftfootlegendGooner
Top Londoner wrote:QuartzGooner wrote:Chippy
The allegations are across all political parties.
Some people have been convicted such as Saville and Stuart Hall etc, but of those listed online not all have even been tried in court.
The British press are nosey so and so's. This is an occasion when they should put their investigative and snooping prowess to good use and uncover evidence, but pass it on to the police rather than publish it all and prejudice a trial before it gets under way.
If the police can be trusted of course?
I am against "Trial by bloggers" though.
As for people being dead, they may still have families who are living.
Just because someone is rich/famous/in politics etc does not mean there has to be extra clamour to pursue them, this sort of thing is done by people in all walks of life and with all types of bank balance.
I am all for investigations and legal action if required, that is of value, but only limited value, if the current scandals are not used as impetus to find out why this abuse is done, and how to prevent it.
Quartz.
Savile was not convicted.
Hall is not a convicted paedophile.
The police are complicit, and have covered up countless paedophile rings.
These child sex rings goes to the very top.
I agree that this happens in all walks of life. Social workers, clergy, bankers, lawyers......royalty too?
The media know much more than they can print, but they're choosing the lesser names to write about for a reason. Think about it.
The whole truth will never out.
Mel Gibson is that you
Re: Paedos in the establishment thread.
Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2015 10:37 pm
by QuartzGooner
Chippy
Saville was not convicted, you are correct, he died before he was found guilty.
But Stuart Hall is in jail now for being a paedo.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-27540137
Re: Paedos in the establishment thread.
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 1:19 am
by Top Londoner
I stand corrected Quartz.
Addressing me as chippy is a bit hurtful though, to be honest.
WENGER OUT
Re: Paedos in the establishment thread.
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 9:25 pm
by QuartzGooner
Top Londoner wrote:
I stand corrected Quartz.
Addressing me as chippy is a bit hurtful though, to be honest.
WENGER OUT
Sorry!
Re: Paedos in the establishment thread.
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2015 9:23 pm
by OneBardGooner
Top Londoner wrote:
I stand corrected Quartz.
Addressing me as chippy is a bit hurtful though, to be honest.
WENGER OUT
Re: Paedos in the establishment thread.
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2015 2:43 pm
by officepest
Janner up before the beak today.
Re: Paedos in the establishment thread.
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2015 3:11 pm
by arseofacrow
officepest wrote:Janner up before the beak today.
Is he out yet mate?
Re: Paedos in the establishment thread.
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 12:14 pm
by OneBardGooner
It fuckin' riles me how all those Paedo *word censored* in the establishment cover fr one another and let all the past perpetrators get away with it - even those scum who have dementia etc
If there is a hell - May they burn forever more....and be fucked up the jacksie by demons...
Re: Paedos in the establishment thread.
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2015 9:22 pm
by Top Londoner
HARVEY
XXXX XXXXXX PROCTOR. allegedly
Bottom rung of the establishment child abusers.
WENGER OUT
* Edited by DB10 - sorry mate, using the word "allegedly" after an accusation presented like that isn't a legal get out of jail card. Had to delete the comment. Remember folks, we must treat all accused as innocent until they are convicted.
Re: Paedos in the establishment thread.
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2015 6:13 pm
by Theoperator
Proctors denial bought back memories of the "sword of truth" Aitkin and the "I never had" Clinton denials. Allegedly at any rate
Re: Paedos in the establishment thread.
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2015 7:34 pm
by Chippy
Top Londoner wrote:HARVEY
XXXX XXXXXX PROCTOR. allegedly
Bottom rung of the establishment child abusers.
WENGER OUT
* Edited by DB10 - sorry mate, using the word "allegedly" after an accusation presented like that isn't a legal get out of jail card. Had to delete the comment. Remember folks, we must treat all accused as innocent until they are convicted.
In normal circumstances I would wholeheartedly agree with you but yesterday he gave a gazillion interviews saying that he had been accused of buggering and killing boys but was totally innocent.
Re: Paedos in the establishment thread.
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:29 pm
by Top Londoner
No dramas DB10. I understand mate.
There is a plethora of information and accusations on the Web about the scum and their heinous activities.
Proctor is just another one taking a bullet for someone higher up imho.
Re: Paedos in the establishment thread.
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2015 7:58 am
by DB10GOONER
Chippy wrote:Top Londoner wrote:HARVEY
XXXX XXXXXX PROCTOR. allegedly
Bottom rung of the establishment child abusers.
WENGER OUT
* Edited by DB10 - sorry mate, using the word "allegedly" after an accusation presented like that isn't a legal get out of jail card. Had to delete the comment. Remember folks, we must treat all accused as innocent until they are convicted.
In normal circumstances I would wholeheartedly agree with you but
yesterday he gave a gazillion interviews saying that he had been accused of buggering and killing boys but was totally innocent.
He may have done, but to label someone like that on a public forum when that someone hasn't been convicted of that crime is a recipe to have the forum shut down again. It doesn't matter what your feelings are towards these people, Chippy, we simply cannot have stuff like that on here. If/when he is convicted of something like that then fine everyone can fill their boots.
Re: Paedos in the establishment thread.
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2015 7:58 am
by DB10GOONER
Top Londoner wrote:No dramas DB10. I understand mate.
Cheers, mate.
