HIJACK ALERTUSMartin wrote:SteveO 35 wrote:I think these comments if anything illustrate why he has not been sacked - he is at the very least willing to work with reduced funding without complaint or criticism of that, and is willing to the point of joining in offering the ususal soundbites which try to paint this as either/or debate as in either the only choice I have is to spend 20 million or spend nothing, just as we have heard Board members talk of the choice being between spending like Chelsea or doing precisely what we are doing, or their best that its between doing exactly what we are doing and ending up bankrupt.donaldo wrote: I think Arsene's sarcastic comments about people giving him stick for not spending £20m gives us an insight as to which type of keeper (if any) we might end up with....
Despite the fact that there is a huge middle ground between the choices they offer and the fact that we have the means to operate within it they insist on pretending it's the "Arsenal Way" or the administration way. As they can get away with it it's hard to blame them really for using such disngenuous logic. It's also much more profitable than venturing into that middle ground and using some of the 150 million plus they sit atop to acquire and ensure we can retain some more top players as well as those we have now.
HIJACK ALERT
HIJACK ALERT.
He would surely have been better than the useless no-brain *word censored* that is Diaby, and how long must we endure the continued poor performances from not only Clichy but Sagna, who has been terrible now for the past 2 seasons.
