If you have the squad, the team & the manager then a ref having a stinker becomes a non issue.1989 wrote:
I reckon Dean is a Y*d
We were shit & had no clue tonight. No amount of blaming Mike Dean can change that.
If you have the squad, the team & the manager then a ref having a stinker becomes a non issue.1989 wrote:
I reckon Dean is a Y*d
Exactly.Dan_85 wrote:If you have the squad, the team & the manager then a ref having a stinker becomes a non issue.1989 wrote:
I reckon Dean is a Y*d
We were shit & had no clue tonight. No amount of blaming Mike Dean can change that.
Come on - that record speaks volumes.....Dean fucking hates us with a passionI Hate Hleb wrote:Exactly.Dan_85 wrote:If you have the squad, the team & the manager then a ref having a stinker becomes a non issue.1989 wrote:
I reckon Dean is a Y*d
We were shit & had no clue tonight. No amount of blaming Mike Dean can change that.
You'd think, wouldn't ya? Not while Wengers target is top four.I Hate Hleb wrote:And we didn't do anything for 93 of the 94 minutes!!northbank123 wrote:I was surprised at how clearly delighted they were with the point. They didn't do anything second half but as we were getting frustrated and stretched I thought we were asking to be fucked on the counter-attack.I Hate Hleb wrote:Don't quite get the criticism of Chelsea. I wish we could go to the home of our supposed title rivals, control the game comfortably, while restricting them to just one clear chance in the whole of 94 minutes!!![]()
![]()
![]()
As the home side surely the onus was on us to create something?
Wenger's record and incompetence in the big matches speaks even louder!! And as for the 'stonewall penalty' - me and I'm sure many of the same people claiming a bias against us would have been screaming blue murder had it been given for Chelsea against us and no doubt been using it as 'evidence' of an anti-Arsenal stance!!SteveO 35 wrote:Come on - that record speaks volumes.....Dean fucking hates us with a passionI Hate Hleb wrote:Exactly.Dan_85 wrote:If you have the squad, the team & the manager then a ref having a stinker becomes a non issue.1989 wrote:
I reckon Dean is a Y*d
We were shit & had no clue tonight. No amount of blaming Mike Dean can change that.
Thing is Hlebby, if Vieira, Adams, Petit or Whoeverthefuck had tried what Mikel did, right in front of the ref they'd have been sent off immediately.I Hate Hleb wrote:What - like the ones we use to employ when we were actually winning things?officepest wrote:Can't abide their tacitly approved strongarm tactics though.I Hate Hleb wrote:Don't quite get the criticism of Chelsea. I wish we could go to the home of our supposed title rivals, be in control of the game quite comfortably, while restricting them to just one clear chance in the whole of 94 minutes!!![]()
Sorry mate, that 6.7% as a statistical anomaly doesn't stack up when the other stats quoted are 60%-odd, there is more chance of winning the lottery whilst being struck by lightning on the 33rd of December.I Hate Hleb wrote:Haven't you considered that the reason we might have such bad stats when Dean is ref is because he generally has us when we have other big teams/tough matches, and as we all know, we nearly always lose those anyway?![]()
Well, er, yeah um...I Hate Hleb wrote:Well Wenger has got a 100% non-winning record against Mourinho, which doesn't stack up with his win percentage against other managers.![]()
Anomalies do happen.
officepest wrote:Well, er, yeah um...I Hate Hleb wrote:Well Wenger has got a 100% non-winning record against Mourinho, which doesn't stack up with his win percentage against other managers.![]()
Anomalies do happen.
Fuck stats anyway. 79.3% of them are bollocks.
Hm...1989 wrote:
I reckon Dean is a Y*d.