I take it back. Maybe he is a football genius!Babu wrote:No shit Sherlock!Mr. Wenger wrote: It is always difficult to isolate one factor. I felt that defensively, away from home, we conceded too many goals!
All is forgiven.
One Arsene Wenger...


I take it back. Maybe he is a football genius!Babu wrote:No shit Sherlock!Mr. Wenger wrote: It is always difficult to isolate one factor. I felt that defensively, away from home, we conceded too many goals!
All is forgiven.
One Arsene Wenger...
Have to agree. It would take a financial implosion of Biblical proportions for us to lose enough money to see Kroenke sack Wenger - and the way the PL and SlySports deals are structured that is highly unlikely to happen.Babu wrote:Last 5 years Arsenal Holdings, with the share price highlighted when he signed his last contract.begeegs wrote: There are probably more things which I have overlooked, but the things above will hurt the bottom line not to mention the loss of prestige to the brand. Could the share prices go down because of those factors? It is difficult to say. If that happens or there is a hint of that, Wenger will be gone.
There was a bit of a drop in the share price in August 2014, but at that time we won the Community Shield and then qualified for the Champions League by getting past Besiktas, and then it kept rising, even though we got knocked out of the Champions League by Monaco, but the FA Cup win consolidated at 1,600 per share. Start of season 2015/16 sees a bit of a slip, but then the TV money was announced, and of course the share price will remain high now, unless we really implode.
We are guaranteed a small fortune every season now just for being Arsenal London in the Premier League.
I think Kroenke is more than happy with that.
This just highlights the split between the fans and the board, they will be happy that our share prices are still rising, largely due to TV money rather than anything we are doing on the field, but the fan base are getting more and more fed up with things, I don't think the rising share price is a good reason to keep Wenger either because it has virtually nothing to do with him, rather EPL football in general milking the money tree of overseas TV rights, they need to understand this otherwise they are going to find a half empty stadium regularly pretty soon, if they cannot get this they really are fools..DB10GOONER wrote:Have to agree. It would take a financial implosion of Biblical proportions for us to lose enough money to see Kroenke sack Wenger - and the way the PL and SlySports deals are structured that is highly unlikely to happen.Babu wrote:Last 5 years Arsenal Holdings, with the share price highlighted when he signed his last contract.begeegs wrote: There are probably more things which I have overlooked, but the things above will hurt the bottom line not to mention the loss of prestige to the brand. Could the share prices go down because of those factors? It is difficult to say. If that happens or there is a hint of that, Wenger will be gone.
There was a bit of a drop in the share price in August 2014, but at that time we won the Community Shield and then qualified for the Champions League by getting past Besiktas, and then it kept rising, even though we got knocked out of the Champions League by Monaco, but the FA Cup win consolidated at 1,600 per share. Start of season 2015/16 sees a bit of a slip, but then the TV money was announced, and of course the share price will remain high now, unless we really implode.
We are guaranteed a small fortune every season now just for being Arsenal London in the Premier League.
I think Kroenke is more than happy with that.
I think what we do agree on is that Souness is a massive *word censored*.DB10GOONER wrote:Babu wrote:Oh yes he was...DB10GOONER wrote: Wenger was not a "football genius" by any means, but he was not just "lucky" either.
![]()
Oh no he weren't!
Babu wrote:I think what we do agree on is that Souness is a massive *word censored*.DB10GOONER wrote:Babu wrote:Oh yes he was...DB10GOONER wrote: Wenger was not a "football genius" by any means, but he was not just "lucky" either.
![]()
Oh no he weren't!
"lucky" is the word though, isn't it. I think he was lucky, and he didn't need any special skill to achieve what he did.
Any average football trainer could have done that with a bit of luck. Just look at George Graham!
![]()
Wenger is average at best, and had one moment when everything fitted into place...and even in his luckiest season he fucked up against Chelsea in the CL and lost to ManU in the Cup...
I think it important to emphasize that prior to Wenkers arrival we had signed Bergkamp and David Platt, who had both been very professional throughout their careers and rolled their eyes at the Tuesday club drinking culture that was here.DB10GOONER wrote:Sorry, I want Wenger gone as much as the next man, but that Souness article is revisionist horseshit from a typical bitter ex-Scouse player. He fucking HATES the fact it was Arsenal that initially broke their dominance of the English game in 89. Shame really, because on a lot of issues Souness talks sense.Babu wrote:This was always my point.Ed Hunter The Gooner wrote:Souness' pretty clear here on what he thinks about wenker... He's a prick but got it spot on here.
http://metro.co.uk/2017/05/04/graeme-so ... l-6614845/
Best Back 5, france's golden generation AND what Souness forgot, a certain Mr. DB10
Even "wenger's" diet and fitness regime wasn't really ground-breaking...stop drinking so much and eating chocolates, and eat vegetables. Hardly revolutionary, except maybe to the english football establishment at that time.
Wenger, an absolute fraud.![]()
Yes Wenger had some luck, and every other manager that has ever won a major trophy has had some luck too. To say it was all luck is bullshit though. I've long said Wenger's greatest ability in his first few years with us was to be pragmatic and recognise what he had - and that is a talent in its own right. He kept the back 5 together and built on it - now days he'd probably break it up and replace it with his own "diamonds in the rough" because his ego has killed his pragmatism dead. He also recognised that the likes of DB10, TH14, Overmars, Petit, PV4 etc etc didn't need to be over-coached and that he could give them freedom to express themselves. Nowadays he'd coach them into tippy tappy shite to the point where they'd be as ineffective as the current shower of shit that disgraces our jersey.
The dietary changes in themselves were not the real accomplishment, but rather successfully enforcing them was. After all TA6 went on record to say that O'Leary had been doing much of the proper eating / stretching / massage thing for years before Wenger arrived, but most of the other players laughed at O'Leary. But Wenger made every player look after their body and they all say his drilling that into them extended all of their careers.
Wenger also intrinsically changed the way PL football was played by introducing the idea of two interchangeable, powerful, physically-strong and technically-skilled DM's that could also attack with devastating effect as well as protect an aging back 4. Most PL clubs followed suit to some degree. When Wenger's fucked up ego then dictated that he should change to the Whore's model of tippy tappy, technically skilled and mobile (but slightly-built) midfielders in the late 2000s the other PL clubs did not follow suit and how many times did we see our players bounced off the ball?
It's a cheap shot by a bitter ex-Scouse twat to put Wenger's early success only at the door of "luck". It is far more complex than that, even though luck played some part as it does for every successful manager. Wenger was not a "football genius" by any means, but he was not just "lucky" either.
I posted this mini-novel on here 6 years ago, and had been preaching for a few years before that on another forum, so not sure how revisionist it is/was, but fair enough, you said the same at the time...DB10GOONER wrote:![]()
"One moment when everything fitted into place"? And that moment lasted about 7 or 8 years...? And included replacing the entire back 5 that he inherited and then somehow going on to win the PL unbeaten...? Seriously? All based on that one moment of luck?![]()
Christ I'm defending the man that has murdered my club over the last 10 years... but I just hate revisionist history...