Canaries V (what proved to be) the Arsenal light-weights

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: Canaries V the Light-Weights Arsenal

Post by northbank123 »

Holding that shot would have been nothing more than I'd expect from a competent PL keeper. To push a shot from well outside the box that was essentially straight at him back out into the middle of the goalmouth was fucking dreadful, no two ways about it.

User avatar
bang goes the 0-0 draw
Posts: 461
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:27 pm
Location: Sutton

Re: Canaries V the Light-Weights Arsenal

Post by bang goes the 0-0 draw »

northbank123 wrote:Holding that shot would have been nothing more than I'd expect from a competent PL keeper. To push a shot from well outside the box that was essentially straight at him back out into the middle of the goalmouth was fucking dreadful, no two ways about it.
Totally agree. If he had pushed it down the line ( which seems easier than knocking it back in the middle) I could forgive. I think it was Barnes as well that said at half time that normally a goalkeeper would be further off his line to cover the angles and when I look it again he does seem to be just standing on his line. Now I don't know much about goalkeeping but seems an interesting point

officepest
Posts: 5072
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:27 am
Location: Lacking a little bit of sharpness in the final third.

Re: Canaries V the Light-Weights Arsenal

Post by officepest »

bang goes the 0-0 draw wrote:
northbank123 wrote:Holding that shot would have been nothing more than I'd expect from a competent PL keeper. To push a shot from well outside the box that was essentially straight at him back out into the middle of the goalmouth was fucking dreadful, no two ways about it.
Totally agree. If he had pushed it down the line ( which seems easier than knocking it back in the middle) I could forgive. I think it was Barnes as well that said at half time that normally a goalkeeper would be further off his line to cover the angles and when I look it again he does seem to be just standing on his line. Now I don't know much about goalkeeping but seems an interesting point
Correct. Speaking as a part time goalie, it's all about the angles. Even if you are a shit keeper just watch Neville Southall in his (not quite as fat) pomp - basic geometry can really improve one's game. Sadly Vito is both shit and quite clearly poorly coached.

User avatar
QuartzGooner
Posts: 14474
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 pm
Location: London

Re: Canaries V the Light-Weights Arsenal

Post by QuartzGooner »

highburyJD wrote: not watched highlights - was Holt offside? looks it on the vid above...
and the Gnabry slipped in through ball for Gervinho looked great live, did he take forever to shoot (what it felt like live) or was it just good defending to close him and block the shot...?
Cannot be sure about Holt but no use crying over spilt milk.

Gnabry very good pass, Gervinho was blocked by good defending.

In retrospect there were reasons why we lost:

Injuries to:

Szczesny
Sagna
Gibbs
Koscielny
Wilshere
Frimpong
Diaby
Rosicky
Walcott

Ramsey just is not the right fit for central midfield
Podolski is below par with an ankle knock
Santos is not really what we need at left back


But in the summer I was one of those on here hoping we would buy

A striker
A left back

before the transfer window closed.

Failure to do both has cost us.

For those wanting Walcott to be sold, even when he has a poor game, he still offers pace and the willingness to shoot.
When Gervinho is off his game he offers nothing of any note.
Like G88ner said, it is the cost of Gervinho that has bothered many of us. If hehad come for £1M then people would accept him for what he is.
But with Oxlade-Chamberlain looking a good prospect, though still inconsistent, and Eisfeld and Gnabry pushing for places, it is the transfer fee of Gervinho that bothers me.
Especially as we had a better player in Benayoun who though physically light weight (though actually if he was a boxer he would be a light-middleweight) would have been better to retain for another year with his consistent work rate, invention and knack for the odd goal.

User avatar
UTU The Arsenal
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:27 pm

Re: Canaries V the Light-Weights Arsenal

Post by UTU The Arsenal »

Its Bad enough for Norwich fans to sing 'Van Persie left cos he thinks Your sh*t, but to go a lose to the carrott crunchers is F*cked UP :cussing:

Different Day Same Bullsh*t has been going for 7 years :heads:

Nothing will change over The Arsenal because fans pay for and accept this Nonsense, £ 50.00 to watch that rubbish and they will go back for more :banghead:

The Cult of Wenger and the Culture of Profit first has turned The Arsenal into a 'Has Been' Team. :cussing:

I

User avatar
Glitch33
Posts: 919
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:03 pm
Location: No longer Gold

Re: Canaries V the Light-Weights Arsenal

Post by Glitch33 »

bang goes the 0-0 draw wrote:
northbank123 wrote:Holding that shot would have been nothing more than I'd expect from a competent PL keeper. To push a shot from well outside the box that was essentially straight at him back out into the middle of the goalmouth was fucking dreadful, no two ways about it.
Totally agree. If he had pushed it down the line ( which seems easier than knocking it back in the middle) I could forgive. I think it was Barnes as well that said at half time that normally a goalkeeper would be further off his line to cover the angles and when I look it again he does seem to be just standing on his line. Now I don't know much about goalkeeping but seems an interesting point
Looking at it again he clearly misjudged the distance of the ball away from him. His left hand was way past the ball and it came off his right. Impossible to hold on to and little chance to push it to the left with his right hand.

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: Canaries V the Light-Weights Arsenal

Post by northbank123 »

Glitch33 wrote:
bang goes the 0-0 draw wrote:
northbank123 wrote:Holding that shot would have been nothing more than I'd expect from a competent PL keeper. To push a shot from well outside the box that was essentially straight at him back out into the middle of the goalmouth was fucking dreadful, no two ways about it.
Totally agree. If he had pushed it down the line ( which seems easier than knocking it back in the middle) I could forgive. I think it was Barnes as well that said at half time that normally a goalkeeper would be further off his line to cover the angles and when I look it again he does seem to be just standing on his line. Now I don't know much about goalkeeping but seems an interesting point
Looking at it again he clearly misjudged the distance of the ball away from him. His left hand was way past the ball and it came off his right. Impossible to hold on to and little chance to push it to the left with his right hand.
Last time he had a run in the side he cost us by doing exactly the same thing at West Ham: dived past a free-kick from Diamante and palmed it straight out into the danger zone. It's goalkeeping fundamentals.

User avatar
LewisT92
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 1:28 pm
Location: London

Re: Canaries V the Light-Weights Arsenal

Post by LewisT92 »

There really shouldn't be any debate whether Vito should of held on to the ball, or what was more easy to do, parry away from danger. This is the EPL, I genuinely can't believe what I saw. If I made a mistake like that on a Saturday, wow...

The shot should have never got to him that easy, two or three players had to close the norwich player down, but it did and as a goalkeeper you have to anticipate that the shot is coming to you. In my opinion this is where he has be caught out and is why his body shape and approach to addressing the shot was totally wrong. He has parried the shot inwards ffs!

Seriously what is Garry Peyton doing on the training ground? But then what do you expect when the fucking manager doesn't feel the need to invest in this area. Joke.

User avatar
franksav63
Posts: 14520
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:07 pm
Location: Home - Whitechapel - Arsenal Block 6 - Twitter - @franksav63
Contact:

Re: Canaries V the Light-Weights Arsenal

Post by franksav63 »

LewisT92 wrote:There really shouldn't be any debate whether Vito should of held on to the ball, or what was more easy to do, parry away from danger. This is the EPL, I genuinely can't believe what I saw. If I made a mistake like that on a Saturday, wow...

The shot should have never got to him that easy, two or three players had to close the norwich player down, but it did and as a goalkeeper you have to anticipate that the shot is coming to you. In my opinion this is where he has be caught out and is why his body shape and approach to addressing the shot was totally wrong. He has parried the shot inwards ffs!

Seriously what is Garry Peyton doing on the training ground? But then what do you expect when the fucking manager doesn't feel the need to invest in this area. Joke.


Their goal really was a catalogue of errors, from the non-existence closing down of the shot, our Fat arsed left back, playing Holt onside, the parry back into play from the big nosed useless wanker, only one of our players coming back in with Holt, then the BNW seems to bounce backwards away from Holt's shot into goal as though he's frightened to dive in at Holt's feet... Hmmm...

User avatar
flash gunner
Posts: 29243
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:55 am
Location: Armchairsville. FACT.

Re: Canaries V the Mighty Arsenal

Post by flash gunner »

highburyJD wrote:armchair says: excuses in early??? did you even read the rest of the post?
I list, what I see as, Wengers keys failings. There are several, many based on discounting the opposition.

in this case I think we can afford to (and should) discount the opposition
Norwich are poo. They may attack, may try and defend deep or hold a high line.
Who cares? Batter them. Losing to them IMO would be inexcusable for the players WHATEVER the manager did
I dont think if we lose Wenger has specifically "fucked it up".

He has assembled a group of players with sufficient quality that if every coach at the club is kidnapped by aliens tonight
they should still win on Saturday
:oops:

:lol:

User avatar
StuartL
Posts: 7878
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 8:22 pm
Location: It’s a new dawn, a new day a new life, for me and I’m feeling good

Re: Canaries V the Light-Weights Arsenal

Post by StuartL »

A good pre match sing song at the Angler ruined by a shit game.

We were pathetic, didn't attack with any purpose or threat.

When will Wenker learn that slow, sideways passing with no forward movement from the wide men is so easy to defend.

The highlight of the afternoon for me was after Holt was subbed, he pushed the BFG virtually upfront and we resorted to lumping it - a tactical masterstroke.

Norwich outplayed us, outfought us, and deserved their victory, and we didn't even go down fighting.

Embarrasing.

Oh and £50 for a ticket made it even harder to swallow.

User avatar
DarylAFC
Posts: 435
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:06 pm
Location: UK

Re: Canaries V the Light-Weights Arsenal

Post by DarylAFC »

StuartL wrote:A good pre match sing song at the Angler ruined by a shit game.

We were pathetic, didn't attack with any purpose or threat.

When will Wenker learn that slow, sideways passing with no forward movement from the wide men is so easy to defend.

The highlight of the afternoon for me was after Holt was subbed, he pushed the BFG virtually upfront and we resorted to lumping it - a tactical masterstroke.

Norwich outplayed us, outfought us, and deserved their victory, and we didn't even go down fighting.

Embarrasing.

Oh and £50 for a ticket made it even harder to swallow.
If the team showed have as much enthusiasm as we did in the pub we would've won 4-0 :(

User avatar
Yankee_Gooner_Dandee
Posts: 2902
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:04 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Re: Canaries V the Light-Weights Arsenal

Post by Yankee_Gooner_Dandee »

We are now only 3 POINTS above Liverpool. The jaded, weakened Liverpool. Those 3 points are from the game we beat them, but other than that we are just as shitty as they are. And just think, 4 weeks ago people were creaming their pants absolutely SURE we were going to beat Chelsea at home. :roll:

1989
Posts: 11832
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:50 pm

Re: Canaries V the Light-Weights Arsenal

Post by 1989 »

Heard they FLEW to Norwich.

Incredible. How fucking spoiled can these useless, pampered, nonchalant, non-caring pricks get?

Fucking hate what has become of this club.

User avatar
QuartzGooner
Posts: 14474
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 pm
Location: London

Re: Canaries V the Light-Weights Arsenal

Post by QuartzGooner »

I have no problem with them flying to Norwich.
The trains were messed up, and it is not the easiest of journeys by road from London.

Post Reply