
City / Citeh Drinking and match thread
- flash gunner
- Posts: 29243
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:55 am
- Location: Armchairsville. FACT.
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62090
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: City / Citeh Drinking and match thread
Yes. Yes, there would.Herd wrote:Another excessive abuse of Power ,lucky you aren't CO19 or there be minicabs riddled with bullets all over London ..! !

- OneBardGooner
- Posts: 47944
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
- Location: Close To The Edge
Re: City / Citeh Drinking and match thread
Yeah only coz the cock eyed *word censored* were shooting at a bus!DB10GOONER wrote:Yes. Yes, there would.Herd wrote:Another excessive abuse of Power ,lucky you aren't CO19 or there be minicabs riddled with bullets all over London ..! !


Re: City / Citeh Drinking and match thread
DB - can you at least give me the pleasure of knowing which specific piece of WUMery got him the latest ban - just a little something to brighten the day !DB10GOONER wrote:Probably because he is banned for WUMing.mcdowell42 wrote:SteveO 35 wrote:He's already in bed because he has a late one on a school night tomorrow.....especially if he keeps up his midweek habit of a couple of beers at the Emirates, Marseille stylemcdowell42 wrote:SteveO 35 wrote:McDowell and Baba have certainly overtaken Rafa the (ex) Gaffer in the FACTS department
Im in good old form tonight stevo, just waiting for Red Cock now to finish his homework so we can have some light hearted banter on here later![]()
He was on here the other night and i said to him shouldnt he be in bed cos he had school in the morning, and he never posted after that
The last one I recall was for saying that "Denilson would be automatic first choice in midfield" if he came back from loan.
What was the offending quote this time?

- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62090
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: City / Citeh Drinking and match thread
It was for continuous WUMing, SteveO. But let's say I like to think the Denilson comment pushed him over the edge!SteveO 35 wrote: DB - can you at least give me the pleasure of knowing which specific piece of WUMery got him the latest ban - just a little something to brighten the day !
The last one I recall was for saying that "Denilson would be automatic first choice in midfield" if he came back from loan.
What was the offending quote this time?


- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62090
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: City / Citeh Drinking and match thread
And to think I talked Flash out of banning you on six occasions. And that was only yesterday ya little ginger crunt ya!!OneBardGooner wrote:Yeah only coz the cock eyed *word censored* were shooting at a bus!DB10GOONER wrote:Yes. Yes, there would.Herd wrote:Another excessive abuse of Power ,lucky you aren't CO19 or there be minicabs riddled with bullets all over London ..! !![]()





-
- Posts: 4992
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 7:35 pm
- Location: Taser the cuunt
Re: City / Citeh Drinking and match thread
OneBardGooner wrote:DB10GOONER wrote:Yes. Yes, there would.Herd wrote:Another excessive abuse of Power ,lucky you aren't CO19 or there be minicabs riddled with bullets all over London ..! !
Yeah only coz the cock eyed *word censored* were shooting at a bus!![]()




the truth hurts,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,I should know.
Re: City / Citeh Drinking and match thread
Poor Red Member. 
Harmless really.

Harmless really.
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62090
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: City / Citeh Drinking and match thread
Not the point though is it? If someone is constantly WUMing or trolling and just posting to get a reaction then they break the site rules. He was warned repeatedly as banning is an absolute last resort on here and always has been. He ignored the warnings.armchair supporter wrote:Poor Red Member.
Harmless really.
Re: City / Citeh Drinking and match thread
I do understand but where I would differ with you is I genuinely think he/she really didn't know what he was saying.DB10GOONER wrote:Not the point though is it? If someone is constantly WUMing or trolling and just posting to get a reaction then they break the site rules. He was warned repeatedly as banning is an absolute last resort on here and always has been. He ignored the warnings.armchair supporter wrote:Poor Red Member.
Harmless really.
I reckon he/she just knows feck all bout footie and it really comes across as very annoying.
I so think he's an absolute 100% attention seeker so I just ingnored Red Member, didn't encourage him by replying or quoting him. (Which annoyed those who had him/her on their "ignore" list.)
Feel a bit sorry for him really.......
-
- Posts: 2710
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:27 pm
- Location: every full moon
Re: City / Citeh Drinking and match thread
1 down, 1 more to go........DB10GOONER wrote: Probably because he is banned for WUMing.


- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62090
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: City / Citeh Drinking and match thread
But there is the crux of it. We as mods can’t ignore him (or anyone) as we have to read all this stuff. And by doing so we really do get a picture of who is trolling/WUMing and who is just a bit thick or “odd” or “abrasive”armchair supporter wrote:I do understand but where I would differ with you is I genuinely think he/she really didn't know what he was saying.DB10GOONER wrote:Not the point though is it? If someone is constantly WUMing or trolling and just posting to get a reaction then they break the site rules. He was warned repeatedly as banning is an absolute last resort on here and always has been. He ignored the warnings.armchair supporter wrote:Poor Red Member.
Harmless really.
I reckon he/she just knows feck all bout footie and it really comes across as very annoying.
I so think he's an absolute 100% attention seeker so I just ingnored Red Member, didn't encourage him by replying or quoting him. (Which annoyed those who had him/her on their "ignore" list.)
Feel a bit sorry for him really.......

One of the big issues though is provocation. If someone is posting mostly to provoke a negative reaction from other forum members then we have to act.
As I said he was warned repeatedly and if he had curtailed the trolling/WUMing then he’d be still on here but he didn’t so he had to go.
I have no sympathy for him because he obviously thought it was funny as fuck to make extra work for us mods.
Re: City / Citeh Drinking and match thread
armchair supporter wrote:I do understand but where I would differ with you is I genuinely think he/she really didn't know what he was saying.DB10GOONER wrote:Not the point though is it? If someone is constantly WUMing or trolling and just posting to get a reaction then they break the site rules. He was warned repeatedly as banning is an absolute last resort on here and always has been. He ignored the warnings.armchair supporter wrote:Poor Red Member.
Harmless really.
I reckon he/she just knows feck all bout footie and it really comes across as very annoying.
I so think he's an absolute 100% attention seeker so I just ingnored Red Member, didn't encourage him by replying or quoting him. (Which annoyed those who had him/her on their "ignore" list.)
Feel a bit sorry for him really.......
Seriously ??


Re: City / Citeh Drinking and match thread
I think once I've consumed enough red wine one evening I will compile a "Red's Greatest Hits" tribute thread......just for old times sake !




Re: City / Citeh Drinking and match thread
Come on, armchair supporter isn't that bad.MegaGooner wrote:1 down, 1 more to go........DB10GOONER wrote: Probably because he is banned for WUMing.![]()
