Groundhog summer transfer window thread

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
User avatar
Dan_85
Posts: 8607
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 12:09 am
Location: London

Re: January transfer rumours thread

Post by Dan_85 »

Fear not, the postman is gonna lead us on our title charge.
Wenger: "I am not concerned about that (buying a striker in January). We have at the moment Sanogo, who is coming back from injury soon."
:popcorn:

User avatar
augie
Posts: 30945
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: January transfer rumours thread

Post by augie »

I Hate Hleb wrote:We are constantly linked with him but having seen the guy play in both Spain and Italy I just don't think Llorente is good enough for us and certainly wouldn't be an upgrade on Giroud or a partner/alternative to him.


Agree with you on that hlebby 8)

User avatar
g88ner
Posts: 14693
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:17 pm

Re: January transfer rumours thread

Post by g88ner »

The Knowing One wrote:This is the same shit he comes out with when he us under pressure and most fans are screaming for blood.
Yeah, but it's also the same shit he would say if we were top of the league and doing well (... er, like we are :D ) so how can you read anything into it? :?

You can't. He's always kept his cards close to his chest whether he's under pressure or not.

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: January transfer rumours thread

Post by northbank123 »

Bendtners Drinking Buddy wrote:Or perhaps he is just playing his cards close to his chest - worked with OZil......
I don't think that had anything to do with keeping his cards close to his chest. It was an amazing signing but suddenly very late in the window a world-class player becomes available, we had cash to burn and fans to appease, I don't think Wenger exactly played the long game and revolved all his plans around that.

Equally what would be the point in being coy now? Everyone knows if we don't sign a striker we'll blow our golden chance at silverware and going after players in Jan smacks of desperation at the best of times so what good will it do to pretend we're not in the market?

User avatar
Dan_85
Posts: 8607
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 12:09 am
Location: London

Re: January transfer rumours thread

Post by Dan_85 »

northbank123 wrote:
Bendtners Drinking Buddy wrote:Or perhaps he is just playing his cards close to his chest - worked with OZil......
I don't think that had anything to do with keeping his cards close to his chest. It was an amazing signing but suddenly very late in the window a world-class player becomes available, we had cash to burn and fans to appease, I don't think Wenger exactly played the long game and revolved all his plans around that.
Wenger had nothing to do with signing Ozil, I'm absolutely convinced of it. That deal was done and signed off by IG and Stan with very little, if any, input from AW. They looked around Europe to see what marquee signings were possibly available at that time and went over his head to do the deal in order to appease the fans at a time when the pressure on Wenger was the most intense it's ever been.

You need only look at the whooping and cheering fans outside AG on transfer deadline day. Two weeks earlier they'd all been calling for Wenger's head and now suddenly all was forgiven. The deal was dressed up on Pravda and in the press to make it look like AW had personally convinced Ozil and suddenly it was all "One Arsene Wenger!" again. Stan and IG smirk, rub their hands, and slap that new contract on Wenger's desk.

Of course Ozil has given the team and the fans the morale boost that DB10 did but I'm 100% convinced that if we'd beaten Villa we would never have signed him.

User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22142
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Re: January transfer rumours thread

Post by SteveO 35 »

Dan_85 wrote:
northbank123 wrote:
Bendtners Drinking Buddy wrote:Or perhaps he is just playing his cards close to his chest - worked with OZil......
I don't think that had anything to do with keeping his cards close to his chest. It was an amazing signing but suddenly very late in the window a world-class player becomes available, we had cash to burn and fans to appease, I don't think Wenger exactly played the long game and revolved all his plans around that.
Wenger had nothing to do with signing Ozil, I'm absolutely convinced of it. That deal was done and signed off by IG and Stan with very little, if any, input from AW. They looked around Europe to see what marquee signings were possibly available at that time and went over his head to do the deal in order to appease the fans at a time when the pressure on Wenger was the most intense it's ever been.

You need only look at the whooping and cheering fans outside AG on transfer deadline day. Two weeks earlier they'd all been calling for Wenger's head and now suddenly all was forgiven. The deal was dressed up on Pravda and in the press to make it look like AW had personally convinced Ozil and suddenly it was all "One Arsene Wenger!" again. Stan and IG smirk, rub their hands, and slap that new contract on Wenger's desk.

Of course Ozil has given the team and the fans the morale boost that DB10 did but I'm 100% convinced that if we'd beaten Villa we would never have signed him.
Which fucker has been going round singing that ??? :D :D :wink:

User avatar
topgoon
Posts: 4266
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: London

Re: January transfer rumours thread

Post by topgoon »

Dan_85 wrote:
northbank123 wrote:
Bendtners Drinking Buddy wrote:Or perhaps he is just playing his cards close to his chest - worked with OZil......
I don't think that had anything to do with keeping his cards close to his chest. It was an amazing signing but suddenly very late in the window a world-class player becomes available, we had cash to burn and fans to appease, I don't think Wenger exactly played the long game and revolved all his plans around that.
Wenger had nothing to do with signing Ozil, I'm absolutely convinced of it. That deal was done and signed off by IG and Stan with very little, if any, input from AW. They looked around Europe to see what marquee signings were possibly available at that time and went over his head to do the deal in order to appease the fans at a time when the pressure on Wenger was the most intense it's ever been.

You need only look at the whooping and cheering fans outside AG on transfer deadline day. Two weeks earlier they'd all been calling for Wenger's head and now suddenly all was forgiven. The deal was dressed up on Pravda and in the press to make it look like AW had personally convinced Ozil and suddenly it was all "One Arsene Wenger!" again. Stan and IG smirk, rub their hands, and slap that new contract on Wenger's desk.

Of course Ozil has given the team and the fans the morale boost that DB10 did but I'm 100% convinced that if we'd beaten Villa we would never have signed him.


As scary as that is you are probably right. The only way we are getting proper replacements in January is if we lose Giroud for a few weeks and then lose h/a to someone sh*te. As luck would have it we have Cardiff(h) and Villa(a) as first 2 games in January

1989
Posts: 11832
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:50 pm

Re: January transfer rumours thread

Post by 1989 »

Ozil has said Wenger promised more big money signings to him when he joined. Don't read too much into the Sanogo talk, Wenger himself knows that the postman will not have a bearing on our season. He's just saying that to make it seem we aren't that desperate for a striker so clubs wouldn't ask the world for their strikers. Wenger's many things but daft he isn't.

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: January transfer rumours thread

Post by northbank123 »

1989 wrote:Ozil has said Wenger promised more big money signings to him when he joined. Don't read too much into the Sanogo talk, Wenger himself knows that the postman will not have a bearing on our season. He's just saying that to make it seem we aren't that desperate for a striker so clubs wouldn't ask the world for their strikers. Wenger's many things but daft he isn't.
It's the January window and the whole world knows we're desperate for a striker, unless he goes in for somebody who the club are absolutely desperate to sell we're gonna have to pay well over the odds regardless of what he says in the meantime.

User avatar
GranadaJoe
Posts: 2412
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:21 pm

Re: January transfer rumours thread

Post by GranadaJoe »

Dan_85 wrote:
northbank123 wrote:
Bendtners Drinking Buddy wrote:Or perhaps he is just playing his cards close to his chest - worked with OZil......
I don't think that had anything to do with keeping his cards close to his chest. It was an amazing signing but suddenly very late in the window a world-class player becomes available, we had cash to burn and fans to appease, I don't think Wenger exactly played the long game and revolved all his plans around that.
Wenger had nothing to do with signing Ozil, I'm absolutely convinced of it. That deal was done and signed off by IG and Stan with very little, if any, input from AW. They looked around Europe to see what marquee signings were possibly available at that time and went over his head to do the deal in order to appease the fans at a time when the pressure on Wenger was the most intense it's ever been.

You need only look at the whooping and cheering fans outside AG on transfer deadline day. Two weeks earlier they'd all been calling for Wenger's head and now suddenly all was forgiven. The deal was dressed up on Pravda and in the press to make it look like AW had personally convinced Ozil and suddenly it was all "One Arsene Wenger!" again. Stan and IG smirk, rub their hands, and slap that new contract on Wenger's desk.

Of course Ozil has given the team and the fans the morale boost that DB10 did but I'm 100% convinced that if we'd beaten Villa we would never have signed him.
Very suspect logic. What convinces you that AW had nothing to do with it? Ozil himself said that a conversation with AW, in German, played an important part in his decision to sign. There's plenty of reason to criticize OGL, but evidence should inform our opinions, not the other way round.

User avatar
brazilianGOONER
Posts: 9208
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:27 am
Location: i think we're parked, man
Contact:

Re: January transfer rumours thread

Post by brazilianGOONER »

Dan_85 wrote: Wenger had nothing to do with signing Ozil, I'm absolutely convinced of it.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
Dan_85
Posts: 8607
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 12:09 am
Location: London

Re: January transfer rumours thread

Post by Dan_85 »

GranadaJoe wrote:
Dan_85 wrote:
northbank123 wrote:
Bendtners Drinking Buddy wrote:Or perhaps he is just playing his cards close to his chest - worked with OZil......
I don't think that had anything to do with keeping his cards close to his chest. It was an amazing signing but suddenly very late in the window a world-class player becomes available, we had cash to burn and fans to appease, I don't think Wenger exactly played the long game and revolved all his plans around that.
Wenger had nothing to do with signing Ozil, I'm absolutely convinced of it. That deal was done and signed off by IG and Stan with very little, if any, input from AW. They looked around Europe to see what marquee signings were possibly available at that time and went over his head to do the deal in order to appease the fans at a time when the pressure on Wenger was the most intense it's ever been.

You need only look at the whooping and cheering fans outside AG on transfer deadline day. Two weeks earlier they'd all been calling for Wenger's head and now suddenly all was forgiven. The deal was dressed up on Pravda and in the press to make it look like AW had personally convinced Ozil and suddenly it was all "One Arsene Wenger!" again. Stan and IG smirk, rub their hands, and slap that new contract on Wenger's desk.

Of course Ozil has given the team and the fans the morale boost that DB10 did but I'm 100% convinced that if we'd beaten Villa we would never have signed him.
Very suspect logic. What convinces you that AW had nothing to do with it? Ozil himself said that a conversation with AW, in German, played an important part in his decision to sign. There's plenty of reason to criticize OGL, but evidence should inform our opinions, not the other way round.
I have no doubt that Wenger probably did speak to him on the phone, once it had been made clear to him by IG/Stan that the signing was gonna happen. Of course he would want to reassure Ozil that he'd been a part of his plans all along and was not simply being used as a pawn to take pressure off the manager. If Wenger really wanted him why would he wait until the last hours of the transfer window? Why not have him in place for the Villa game? Why was there absolutely no talk of Ozil until the final week of the window after Real had signed Bale? Why sign yet another creative midfielder when we were all crying out for a striker? Maybe because Ozil was the only realistic marquee signing that was possible for us at the time?

AW is stubborn, we all know that. Everyone in the press knows that. He hates the transfer window, as he has said himself. He would prefer not to spend big, the only time he does so is when his hand is forced or when the pressure on himself is so great, a la 8-2 at OT in 2011.

kiwomya
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:56 pm
Location: London

Re: January transfer rumours thread

Post by kiwomya »

Dan_85 wrote:
GranadaJoe wrote:
Dan_85 wrote:
northbank123 wrote:
Bendtners Drinking Buddy wrote:Or perhaps he is just playing his cards close to his chest - worked with OZil......
I don't think that had anything to do with keeping his cards close to his chest. It was an amazing signing but suddenly very late in the window a world-class player becomes available, we had cash to burn and fans to appease, I don't think Wenger exactly played the long game and revolved all his plans around that.
Wenger had nothing to do with signing Ozil, I'm absolutely convinced of it. That deal was done and signed off by IG and Stan with very little, if any, input from AW. They looked around Europe to see what marquee signings were possibly available at that time and went over his head to do the deal in order to appease the fans at a time when the pressure on Wenger was the most intense it's ever been.

You need only look at the whooping and cheering fans outside AG on transfer deadline day. Two weeks earlier they'd all been calling for Wenger's head and now suddenly all was forgiven. The deal was dressed up on Pravda and in the press to make it look like AW had personally convinced Ozil and suddenly it was all "One Arsene Wenger!" again. Stan and IG smirk, rub their hands, and slap that new contract on Wenger's desk.

Of course Ozil has given the team and the fans the morale boost that DB10 did but I'm 100% convinced that if we'd beaten Villa we would never have signed him.
Very suspect logic. What convinces you that AW had nothing to do with it? Ozil himself said that a conversation with AW, in German, played an important part in his decision to sign. There's plenty of reason to criticize OGL, but evidence should inform our opinions, not the other way round.
I have no doubt that Wenger probably did speak to him on the phone, once it had been made clear to him by IG/Stan that the signing was gonna happen. Of course he would want to reassure Ozil that he'd been a part of his plans all along and was not simply being used as a pawn to take pressure off the manager. If Wenger really wanted him why would he wait until the last hours of the transfer window? Why not have him in place for the Villa game? Why was there absolutely no talk of Ozil until the final week of the window after Real had signed Bale? Why sign yet another creative midfielder when we were all crying out for a striker? Maybe because Ozil was the only realistic marquee signing that was possible for us at the time?

AW is stubborn, we all know that. Everyone in the press knows that. He hates the transfer window, as he has said himself. He would prefer not to spend big, the only time he does so is when his hand is forced or when the pressure on himself is so great, a la 8-2 at OT in 2011.
You are suggesting that Wenger was given a player he didn't want to sign. Why would a stubborn man be happy with that?!

User avatar
I Hate Hleb
Posts: 18632
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:36 pm
Location: London

Re: January transfer rumours thread

Post by I Hate Hleb »

Although something similar was touted when we got Arshavin. :rubchin: :rubchin: Personally doubt Wenger would have those above him sign players he didn't rate but perhaps they may have paid more than Wenger might have wanted in order to ease the fan pressure on them? :rubchin:

User avatar
Dan_85
Posts: 8607
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 12:09 am
Location: London

Re: January transfer rumours thread

Post by Dan_85 »

kiwomya wrote:You are suggesting that Wenger was given a player he didn't want to sign. Why would a stubborn man be happy with that?!
I'm suggesting Wenger was given a player who he admires and would no doubt have liked, but wouldn't have bought if he wasn't pushed. And that the signing was completed by his superiors with an alternative motive.

And personally, I'd go along with anything my manager gave me if I was getting £7.5m a year in return.

Post Reply