Page 4 of 4
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:25 pm
by Peeman
USMartin wrote:Peeman wrote: I agree more money should have been spent - I get it.
But even with the squad we have there now and consider the silly points thrown away this season - u know the games i'm not goin to list em - we should have the league in the bag, with a bit of motivation and tactical nouse.
I'm afraid I don't quite agree. I'm not dismissing your argument given how shite Chelsea and united are this year, but I think that underestimates just how lacking this squad really is. It's not 2-3 players its more like 5-6 players short and that's only if you can get a grimandi type and Wiltord type who can be effective in more than one position to replace a couple of the weak links on our bench that are forced to play too regularly to let us win.
Disagree - even without buying anyone, which I think he should definitely definitely definitely definitely have done.
We could have won league with this team if Wenger just woke up and smelled the coffee and gave team tactics motivation belief inspiration etc etc
So we will agree to disagree
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:30 pm
by USMartin
Peeman wrote:USMartin wrote:Peeman wrote: I agree more money should have been spent - I get it.
But even with the squad we have there now and consider the silly points thrown away this season - u know the games i'm not goin to list em - we should have the league in the bag, with a bit of motivation and tactical nouse.
I'm afraid I don't quite agree. I'm not dismissing your argument given how shite Chelsea and united are this year, but I think that underestimates just how lacking this squad really is. It's not 2-3 players its more like 5-6 players short and that's only if you can get a grimandi type and Wiltord type who can be effective in more than one position to replace a couple of the weak links on our bench that are forced to play too regularly to let us win.
Disagree - even without buying anyone, which I think he should definitely definitely definitely definitely have done.
We could have won league with this team if Wenger just woke up and smelled the coffee and gave team tactics motivation belief inspiration etc etc
So we will agree to disagree
No worries about that, as we see eye-to-eye on the need for more spending.
I'll only add that the only way - whoever is at fault foir that lack of spending - is to challange the Board on that issue - otherwise they are under no pressure whatsoever to change anything whether its their own policies or failed policies initiated by the manager. And if we assume it can only be the latter they can if its not simply hide behind the cirrent manager and let him take the heat they should be taking. That is why we can't just assume its still Good Old Arsenal like its used to be.
Re: no more board threads
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:38 pm
by QuartzGooner
Herd that's off key.
Fiszman paid for Bergkamp out of his own money.
Re: no more board threads
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:45 pm
by USMartin
QuartzGooner wrote:Herd that's off key.
Fiszman paid for Bergkamp out of his own money.
There is some dispute on that but you are right that what Herd said went well and truly too far.
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:17 pm
by Arsenal 1991
Arsenal 1991 wrote:USMartin wrote:Peeman wrote:How much do tactics cost Martin ?
How much does it cost to motivate players ?
All I want is two numbers off you to the closest pound.
I'll give you what I wish.
Again if we are honest there no really different tactics in place now now than the years where we finished in the top two every year anbd won the League three times.
You can't be serious?
The difference is the lack of quality and experience and past success in the players here now. From 1998-2005 we brought in proven players of proven quality and experience many of whom had already been key parts of successful teams or had grown in and around successful teams.
Now we buy players with potential rather than proven quality by and large and use the Premier League as their training facility istead of just the League Cup as back in 2004, and that lack of quality of experience and figuring in winning teams is much of if not all the difference really for me.
A good coach with great players will beat a great coach wiith good players far more often than not.
Ferguson and United beg to differ.
As for the motivation factor I think its hard to motivate over paid performers who know they are not expected to do better than to finish in the top four especially when you are one of the undermotivated as I suspect the manager may well be. I think that there is a top-down malaise among the footballing end of Arsenal since the Board made property construction and management its main priority. I don't think anyomne cares as much because they are under no pressure to from their employers and well paid to ease their wounds.
We've got a great first team with a few great squad players. 90% of our midfield and attackers are played out of position. They look far worse than they are. Walcott, Vela, Bendtner, Arshavin, Chamakh, RVP and probably Nasri would all flourish in different positions/formations.
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:14 am
by USMartin
Arsenal 1991 wrote: You can't be serious?
Yes - many of the same managerial strengths and weaknesses he shows now he showed from 1998-2005
Arsenal 1991 wrote: Ferguson and United beg to differ.
As poor as this United side is - would you really take anyone at Arsenal right now ahead of VanDerSaar, Vidic, Ferdinand, Evra, Rooney Hernandez, Carrick, Berbatov, Giggs to name a few based on how they are playing this year?
This is a crap United side compared to other sides but it still has far more proven quality than our side does, and more importantly has it in the the team's spine.
Arsenal 1991 wrote:We've got a great first team with a few great squad players. 90% of our midfield and attackers are played out of position. They look far worse than they are. Walcott, Vela, Bendtner, Arshavin, Chamakh, RVP and probably Nasri would all flourish in different positions/formations.
Vela and Bendtner are not good enough full stop. Chamakh probably is not good enough either unfortunately.
Neither certainly are Denilson, Squillaci, Eboue, and Almunia. I'm afraid Rosicky is not either and probably Fabianski is not. Song has moved backward as has Clichy.
We have some very good talent, bnut a great first eleven? I don't think so. I don't think we are a million miles away but we aren't there now, and its naive to think we are already.
Re: no more board threads
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 3:20 am
by Herd
But you've shown you're true colours.
PATHETIC.
Il tell you what is pathetic ,people who write mewkish RIPS's on a website for a man they didn't know anything about.
People saying the the Lord Fizman was a true Gooner ,cobblers! ! !
He never stood on the clock end nor did he ever have any interest in football beyond enhancing his share value and getting paid for flying the players around.
Why I should mourn his passing or be respectful to his memory after he has fucked up Arsenal football club for the foreseeable future is totally beyond me .
Would any of you mourn your wife's lover after you witness them fucking the person you care most about whilst you watched on helpless ,I hardly think so ?
My thoughts or your RIP's will not raise him from the dead unless of course he is the second coming of Christ, but unlike Jesus of Nazareth he did nothing for anyone but himself .
As for my true colours you sanctimonious dweeb bren they are red and white or yellow and blue .
Re: ....
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 9:24 pm
by flash gunner
Well played sir
